Laserfiche WebLink
• Little Canada Planning Commission, <br />Mayor and City Council <br />25 March 1981 <br />Page Four <br />to have adequate room for parking expansion. The following areas are <br />viewed as having potential for parking expansion: Tract E - 4 spaces along <br />the western edge of the property and 19 spaces along the south side of the <br />building. Tract F - 11 spaces along the western edge of the property and <br />19 spaces along the north side of the building. Tract G - 13 to 19 spaces <br />along the western edge of the property (not including the area shown as <br />Tract H). <br />4. Loading areas are considered more than adequate and, in fact, if not fully <br />utilized for loading purposes could be used for additional parking expansion. <br />5. As shown on Exhibit A, the zoning boundary between the R -1 and 1 -1 <br />portions of the site extends straight across the southern 340 feet of the property. <br />As proposed, the industrial subdivision extends into the R -1 district. From <br />a design perspective the proposed property line makes sense, however, <br />technically a rezoning should take place to adjust the zoning district <br />boundaries. While this will require an additional public hearing, it is <br />viewed as preventing potential future problems. It should be noted that <br />the rezoning need not delay processing of the request. <br />C. Landscaping Plan (see Exhibit D, attached) <br />The landscape plan submitted as part of this request is not considered adequate <br />for review. Section 903.020 G. of the Little Canada Zoning Ordinance provides <br />specific requirements for screening and landscaping, including details of species, <br />size and spacing of plant materials. Also, a bid based upon the proposed lard - <br />scape plan must be submitted from a certified nurseryman. Once the landscape <br />plan and bid have been submitted, a performance bond should be required. <br />While the landscaping need not delay processing of the request, this issue should <br />not be taken lightly. As you may recall, the original 1 -1 district was extended <br />southward by the previous owner of the property. That rezoning was approved with <br />the understanding that considerable screening and landscaping would occur between <br />the two districts to ensure compatibility. It is therefore recommended that in <br />preparing the detailed landscape plan, the developer place more emphasis on . <br />screening and landscaping between the two districts. <br />8 <br />