Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />JUNE 19, 2006 <br />In reviewing the Medium-Density Residential District (R-2), the Planner <br />indicated that he would delete references to "agriculCUral" similar Co the <br />changes Co be made in the R-1 District. <br />LaValle raised Che issue of the varying building height maximums in the <br />R-1 and R-2 Districts. The Planner explained how building height is <br />measured, and also noted that it is common in R-1 and R-2 Districts to <br />limit height so that huge structures are not constructed. The Administrator <br />also noted that the City implemented a building height limitation in the R- <br />3District at the time that the Fire Department did not have fire fighting <br />capabiliCies for high-rise structures. <br />Those present reviewed the High Density Residential District (R-3). The <br />Planner noted Chat staff discussed the parking of recreational vehicles at <br />multi-family housing complexes and whether or not to prohibit these <br />vehicles entirely, prohibit them from being parking in required parking or <br />in landscaped areas, or require creation of designated, paved and screened <br />areas for this parking. <br />McGraw indicated that any restrictions that Che City can place on the <br />parking of recreational vehicles helps townhome and condo associations in <br />regulating this parking on their properties. McGraw reported that this <br />issue is a constant hassle for association boards to deal with. McGraw felt <br />that recreational vehicles should be parked in designated, paved and <br />screened areas. <br />Allan felt if limitations are placed on the parking of recreational vehicles <br />in R-3, then limitations should also be established for R-1 and R-2 <br />properties. LaValle stated that he did not want to be too restrictive on this <br />issue. Keis noted that multi-family properties must have at least enough <br />space to meet parking requirements. If there is additional space to <br />accommodate the parking of recreational vehicles, Keis indicated YhaC was <br />acceptable to him. He did not support requiring that the recreational <br />vehicles be screened since there was no requirement for screening in R-1. <br />The Administrator felt Chat restrictions on recreational vehicle parking in <br />the R-3 would be used when there was a problem. He noted a recent <br />problem at the Sleepy Hollow complex. The Administrator indicated that <br />when recreational vehicle parking is impacting required parking, Che City <br />could then utilize the ordinance requirements to address the situation. The <br />Planner suggested that he put together some language to address this issue. <br />The Planner asked if Chere was interest in allowing for increased building <br />height in the R-3 District by CUP. It was noted that there is little or no <br />