Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10-13-1982 Council AgendaAGENDA LITTLE CANADA CITY COUNCIL MEETING 10 -13 -82 1. Call to order. ( 7:30 P.M.) 2. Roll Call Mayor Mr. Raymond Hanson. Councilman Mr. Michael Fahey . Councilwoman Mrs. Beverly Scalze ,Councilman Mr. Dennis Forsberg Councilwoman Mrs Mugs Nardini Attorney Mr. Thomas Sweeney Consulting Engineer: Mr. Donald Carley Planner Mr. Brad Nielson Recording Secretary, Mrs Kathleen Glanzer 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: REG. MEETING: Sept.- 27 -82- Tape no. to Corrections: Motion to approve: motion by 2nd by Ayes Nayes SPECIAL MEETING SEPT. -29 -82 Corrections: motion to approve: motion by 2nd by Ayes Nayes Page -1- AGENDA LITTLE CANADA CITY COUNCIL MEETING 10 -13 -82 CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGS: 4. INDUSTRIAL REVENUE BONDS Tape no. to Flameburger Hearing scheduled for 7:30. SEE CORRESPONDENCE: Page -1- Notice of public hearing. Pages -5- thru -6- Application Pages -2- thru -5- NEW REGULATIONS FOR 1983. COMMENTS OBJECTIONS Motion to close hearing: Motion by 2nd by Ayes Nayes Motion to Approve issuance of $ 240,000.00 Industrial Revenue Bonds Motion by 2nd by Ayes Nayes. MOTION TO APPROVE FINAL NOTE RESOLUTION: ( Docuements pending) Page -2- Motion by 2nd by Ayes Nayes AGENDA LITTLE CANADA CITY COUNCIL MEETING 10 -13 -82 CONTINUED IDEMS BY PERSONAL REPRESENTATION. 5. KROISS: Rescind res. no. 82 -7 -370. SEE CORRESPONDENCE: Tape no. to PAGE -7- Notice sent to property owners within 350 ft. ( NOTE: THE NOTICE INDICATES ALL PERSONS DESIRING TO BE HEARD CONCERNTNG THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD.) PAGE -8- Mailing list Page -9- Letter from Mr. For COMMENTS FROM KROISS or his representative. COMMENTS FROM OTHERS. ATTORNEY: Motion to rescind resolution no. 82 -7 -370 Motion by 2nd by Ayes Nayes 5. BRINKMAN- LIQUOR DISPLAY LICENSE Tape no. to Appearing Mr. Brinkman. SEE CORRESPONDENCE: Pages- 10 thru -l1- Applications. Pages- 12 thru -12 -A- Little Canada Ord. pertaining to Display. License fee is $ 300.00 Motion to approve License to Display Intoxicating Liquor. Motion by 2nd by Ayes Nayes Page -3- AGENDA LITTLE CANADA CITY COUNCIL MEETING 10-13-83 CONTINUED COUNCIL LEGISLATIVE MATTERS MATTERS TABLED: 6. Roseville School Deferred Assessments : Res. No. 82 -9 -476 ( Table the matter) Motion to bring to table : Motion by Tape no. to 2nd by Ayes Nayes SEE CORRESPONDENCE PAGE- 13- Letter from School Dist.(.Use of land for assessment) PAGE- 14- amount deferred. Motion to: Continue deferred assessment Cancel deferred assessment Other Motion by 2nd by Ayes Nayes 7. Woodlynn Ave Tape no. to Res. no. 82 -9 -471 Table Matter. Motion to bring to table Motion by 2nd by Ayes Nayes Motion to A). continue to table-until B). to table indefintely C). other actions. Motion by 2nd by Ayes Nayes Page -4- AGENDA LITTLE CANADA CITY COUNCIL MEETING 10-13-82 CONTINUED COUNCIL LEGISLATIVE MATTERS MATTER TABLED CONTINUED Tape no. to 8. Game Rooms Res. No. 82 -9 -455 Tabled the matter. Motion to bring to table; motion by 2nd by Ayes Nayes Motion to: Continue to table until To table indefintely Other: SEE SPECIAL REPORT - C- game rooms 9. Paisely San. Swr Connection: ( Paisely was instructed to submit bids to Roger) ( He is waiting for a 3rd bid) Page -5- AGENDA LITTLE CANADA CITY COUNCIL MEETING 10 -13 -82 CONTINUED COUNCIL LEGISLATIVE MATTERS ATTORNEY 10. See Correspondence pages-l5- thru -16- Report on Easement filling Payne Ave Drainage. Tape no. to 11. Malosky San. Swr. Connection. ( see minutes - 9 -22 -82 page -21- )(Malosky Question of San. Sewer Connection. Manatory connection - See sec. 205.020. Malosky property is zone B -3- House is none - conforming to zoning. Actions 12. Attorney other. ENGINEER 13. Hammond Drainage Matter See correspondence pages -17 thru -18- It appears that Mr. Hammond wants use to do additional work. Tape no. to 14. Sleepy Hallow Drainage- ( Imp. 81 -15) Tape no. to SEE CORRESPONDENCE PAGES -19 -thru- 21. ( MnDot agrees to participate in cost.) 15. Final Payment to Total Asphalt Tape no. to SEE CORRESPONDENCE PAGES- 22 thru- 25. Motion toaccept the project and make final payment. ( Project No. 81 -14- S.A.P. 200- 102 -03) ( S. Owasso Blvd) Motion by 2nd by Ayes Nayes 16. Park St. 17 Other. Page -6- AGENDA LITTLE CANADA CITY COUNCIL MEETING 10 -13 -82 CONTINUED COUNCIL LEGISLATIVE MATTERS PUBLIC SAFETY Tape no. to Mr. Hanson. 18. Approval of 1983 Sheriff's contract. See special Report -A- Motion to approve contract: motion by 2nd by Ayes Nayes 19. Memberships: Cable Communication Newsletter. Tape no. to SEE CORRESPONDENCE - page -26- Statement $ 75.00 pr yr. Pages -29- thru -30- sample copy of the monthly newsletter. Motion to approve Deny table subscribtion Motion by 2nd by Ayes ( Do not know if this is for -1- or -5- subscribers) Nayes 20. Other. BUILDING ZONING Mrs Nardini. 21 Reports if any. Page -7- Tape no. to AGENDA LITTLE CANADA CITY COUNCIL MEETING 10 -13 -82 CONTINUED COUNCIL LEGISLATIVE MATTERS UTILITIES Mr. Forsberg. 22. Bid for Radios Bids Motion by Award bid to Ayes 2nd by Nayes Tape no. to 23. " Np Parking Signs on Calla Lane " Tape - to SEE CORRESPONDENCE PAGE -31 -- so far we have received no complaints of no mail and paper delev 24. " No Parking on Noel Dr. " Tape no. to See minutes 9 -22 -82 page -22 ( No resolution to post) Roger wants to discuss this matter. 25. Letter ( note) from Mr Garske indicate that he construct swail see correspondence pahe -32- 26 Other. PARKS RECREATION Mrs Scalze 27 Tape no. to Black topping parking lots See'correspondence page -41- ( letter from School Dist. requesting 28 other. parking lots be black top.) Page -8- AGENDA LITTLE CANADA CITY COUNCIL MEETING 10 -13 -82 CONTINUED COUNCIL LEGISLATIVE MATTERS ADMINISTRATION Mr. Fahey 29. Holzschuh Plat - &- Assessments SEE CORRESPONDENCE PAGES- 33 thru -34- Tape no. to IT APPEARS THAT MR. HOLZSCHUH IS REQUESTING A DEFERRED ASSESSMENT FOR one -YR inorder to file plat. Matter should be referred to attorney. Motion to refer to attorney ( Project- 79 -1- Payne Ave) Motion by 2nd by Ayes Nayes 30 Cancel levy City Property Parcel no. 53- 81500- 180 -03 ( now 53- 81500- 010 -04) Park in West Wind Add. Tape no. to Amount to be canceled = $ 495.58 for assessment D/P 1814 (Water) SEE CORRESPONDENCE PAGES -35 thru -40- Motion to cancel levy for Aud 1814 in the amount of $ 495.58 Motion by 2nd by Ayes Nayes 31 Other. 32 Approval of payroll vouchers Motion by 2nd by 33 Motion to adjourn: motion by Time adjourned: Ayes Nayes 2nd by ayes Nayes Page -I0- CORRESPONDENCE TO AGENDA LITTLE CANADA CITY COUNCIL MEETING - 10 -13 -82 PAGE CONTENTS - 2- thru - 4 - thru - 6 - - 7- -10- thru -11- -]2- thru -12 -A- Notice of Public hearing - Industrial Revenue Bonds Flameburger 1983 New Regulations pertaining to Industrial Bonds Application - Flameburger Indust. Bonds Notice concerning rescinding of the resolution Kroiss proposed plat. Mailing list concerning Kroiss plat. Letter from Gordon Forbes concerning Kroiss plat. Application for consumption and display of Intoxicating liquor- Brinkman - rental hall. Little Canada ord. pertaining to display of liquor. -13- Letter from Roseville School Dist. concerning assessments - 14- Deferred assessment on school property. -15- thru -16 Letter from Attorney concerning progress on easement on payne ave drainage. -17- thru -18 Letter from Mr. Hammond concerning his pond. -19- thru -21 Letter from MnDot- concerning imp. 81 -15 ( Sleepy Hallow) - 22- thru -25 Reports pertaining to final payemnt to Total Asphalt Imp. So. Owasso Blvd. -26- thru -30 Publication concerning Cable T.V. - 31- Letter conerning No Parking Signs on Carla Lane -32- Letter from Mr. Garske concering drainage swail -33- thru -34- Letter from Mr. Holzschuh concering filing his plat -35- thru -40- a -41- R Cancel assessment levy on City Property. ( Park in Westwind) Letter from Roseville School Dist. (Blacking topping) ALSO SEE SPECIAL REPORTS- A- 1983 Sheriff Contracts. B- Ramsey County -5- yr plan Game Room. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON A PROPOSAL FOR A COMMERCIAL FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT PROJECT To whom it may concern: Notice is hereby given that the City Council of the City of Little Canada, Minnesota will meet at the City Center in the City of Little Canada, Minnesota at 7 :30 o'clock p.m. on October 13, 1982, to consider the proposal of Forster - Matson Properties, that the City assist in financing a project hereinafter described by the issuance of industrial development revenue bonds. Description of Project Construction and partial equipping of a Flameburger Restaurant to be located on the second site north of Demont Avenue on the east side of Rice Street in Little Canada. The estimated principal amount of bonds or other obligations to be issued to finance this project is $240,000. Said bonds or other obligations if and when issued will not constitute a charge, lien or encumbrance upon any property of the City except the project and such bonds or obligations will not be a charge against the City's general credit or taxing powers but are payable from sums to be paid pursuant to a revenue agreement. A draft copy of the proposed application to the Commissioner of Energy, Planning and Development, State of Minnesota, for approval of the project, together with all attachments and exhibits thereto, is available for public inspection beginning September 9, 1982, from 8:00 o'clock a.m. to 4:00 o'clock p.m., Monday through Friday, at the City Center. At the time and place fixed for said Public Hearing, the City Council of the City of Little Canada will give all persons who appear at the hearing an opportunity to express their views with respect to the proposal. Dated this 8th day of September, 1982. (BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL) By /s/ Joseph Chlebeck City Clerk ===.1 11111 [11=B league of minnesota cities Federal Legislative Information To: Mayors, Managers, Administrators, Clerks From: Don Slater, Executive Director; Cathy Quiggle, Research Assistant RE: Effect of the new tax legislation on the municipal bond market The recently passed Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982 includes several provisions which affect the municipal bond market. One provision of the new law which will directly affect the municipal bond market is the so- called minimum tax for corporations. After December 31, 1982 Corporations will have to reduce by 15 percent the interest they deduct from their taxes on borrowings that are used to buy or carry tax - exempt bonds. Corporations most affected by this provision are banks which currently hold 45 percent of all tax - exempt bonds. This is likely to drive up interest rates to issuers by reducing bank demand for bonds. The Act also makes several changes in the Industrial Revenue Bond legislation. Attached is a summary of the provisions affecting industrial revenue bonds. DS:CQ:lw Attach. 1 83 university avenue east, st. paul, minnesota 55101 (81 2) 227 -5600 SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS IN TAX EQUITY AND FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY ACT OF 1982 AFFECTING TAX- EXE_; ?T PONDS Industrial Revenue Bonds 1. A public hearing and approval by an elected official or legislative body or voter referendum are required by both the issuing jurisdiction and the jurisdiction where the facilities are located. 2. Facilities financed with bonds must be depreciated on a straight -line basis using accelerated depre- ciation (ACRS) lives. Full ACRS deductions would still be ?erpitted for low- income rental housing, munici_al sewage or solid waste facilities, pollution control facilities for plants placed in service prior to July 1, 1982, and facilities for which UDAG grant has been awarded. 3. Infornat.ion regarding the amount of the lendable proceeds, the interest rate, term of the issue, and principle users must be reported to the IRS for bends issued during the preceding calendar quarter. (This requrement also applies to student loan bonds and bonds for tax - exempt organizations under Sec. 501(c)(3) of IRC.) 4. The average term for maturity of bonds would be limited to a period no greater than ,120 percent of the average economic life of the assets financed by the bonds. 5. Small issue IRB's (under $10 million) are not permitted where 25 percent or more of the bond proceeds are used to finance retail food and beverage services (except grocery stores), auto- mobile sales or service, and the provision of recreation or entertainment. No portion of the proceeds may be used to finance any private or commercial golf course, country club, massage parlor, tennis club, skating facility, racquet sports facility, hot tub facility, suntan facility, or race track. TAX EQUITY AND FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY ACT OF 1982 6. Small issue composite bonds are explicitly permitted as long as all facilities in an issue are located in the same state and no user (in- cluding franchises) finances more than one facility in the same issue. 7. Certain research and development expenditures are excluded from the calculation of the capital expenditure limits for small issue IRBs. 8. Bonds can additionally be used for the following purposes: (a) gas distribution facilities in service areas consisting of no more than a city and a contiguous county; (b) local district heating and cooling facilities; (c) acquisition of existing pollution control facilities by a regional pollution control authority which it will operate; (d) advance refunding bonds for certain Ponds of the Port Authority of St. Paul; and (e) - °"` =as used in providing mass trans- portation services. 9. $1 million or smaller "clean limit" bonds cannot be issued as part of any other tax - exempt obli- gations. 10. Small issues IRB's cannot be issued after December 31, 1986. 11. In general, the above provisions apply to bonds issued after December 31, 1982. Item #2 applies to property placed in service after December 31, 1982 to the extent it is financed by bonds issued after June 30, 1982. Items #6,8,9, and 10 are effective after the date of enactment of the Act. Certain exceptions are made for refunding bonds. 12. After December 31, 1982, all tax - exempt obligations must be issued in registered form except those not offered for public sale or less than 1 year in maturity. CM- 00424 -01 This Application must be submitted to the Commissioner in duplicate. STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BUSINESS SERVICES Application For Approval of Municipal Industrial Revenue Bond Project Date To: Minnesota Department of Energy, Planning and Development Business Services 480 Cedar Street St. Paul, MN 55101 The governing body of the City of Little Canada , County of Ramsey Minnesota, hereby applies to the Commissioner of the State of Minnesota, Department of Energy, Planning and Development, for approval of this community's proposed municipal Industrial Revenue Bond Issue, as required by Section 1, Subdivision 7, Chapter 474, Minnesota Statutes. We have entered into preliminary discussions with: Firm Forster - Matson Properties Address 913 Wpgt Minnehaha City Saint Paul State Minnesota 59104 State of Incorporation Minnpgnta general partnership Attorney Briggs and Morgan, P.A. Address St. Paul, MN Name of Project -,m Fleburger Restaurant Proj ct This firm is engaged primarily in (nature of business): owning and operating restaurants The funds received from the ,ale of the Industrial Revenue Bonds will be used to (general nature of project): construct and partially equip a restaurant facility It will be located in Little Canada The total bond issue will be approximately $ 240,000 to be applied toward payment of costs now estimated as follows: Cost Item Amount Land Acquisition and Site Development $ Construction Contracts 210,000 Equipment Acquisition and Installation Architectural and Engineering Fees 5,000 Legal Fees 8,000 Interest during Construction 10,000 fnrt-ia-1- Bend- ites-erve Bank fees 6,000 Contingencies Bond - -Discount Placement fee Other - City fee r J 2,000 1,500 It is presently estimated that construction will begin on or about October. 15 19 82, and will be completed on or about Aori1 15 , 19 82• When completed, there will be approximately 30 new jobs created by the project at an annual payroll of approximately $ 120,000 based upon currently prevailing wages The tentative term of the financing is 1982 20 years, commencing October The following exhibits are furnished with this application and are incorporated herein by reference: 1. An opinion of bond counsel that the proposal constitutes a project under Minnesota Stat., Chapter 474.02. 2. A copy of the city council resolution giving preliminary approval for the issuance of its revenue bonds. 3. A comprehensive statement by the municipality indicating how the project satisfies the public purpose of Minnesota Stat., Chapter 474.01. 4. A letter of intent to purchase the bond issue or a letter confirming the feasibility of the project from a financial standpoint. 5. A statement, signed by the principal representative of the issuing . authority, to the effect that upon entering into the revenue agreement, the information required by Minn. Stat., Ch. 474.01 Subd. 8 will be submitted to the Department of Energy, Planning and Development. 6. A statement, signed by the principal representative of the issuing authority, that the project does not include any property to be sold or affixed to or consumed in the production of property for sale, and does not include any housing facility to be rented or used as a permanent residence. 7. A statement, signed by the principal representative of the issuing authority, that a public hearing was conducted pursuant to Minn. Stat. 474.01 Subd. 7b. The statement shall include the date, time and place of the meeting and that all interested parties were afforded an opportunity to express their views. 8, A copy of the notice of publication of the public hearing. We, the undersigned, are duly elected representatives of Little Canada Minnesota, and solicit your approval of this project at your earliest convenience so that we may carry it to a final conclusion. Signed by: (Principal Officers or Representatives of Issuing Authority) Mayor Clerk This approval shall not be deemed to be an approval by the Commissioner or the State of the feasibility of the project or the terms of the lease to be executed or the bonds to be issued therefor. Date of Approval Commissioner Minnesota Department of Energy, Planning and Development 6 CITY OF LITTLE CANADA RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA Office of: JOSEPH G. CHLEBECK, Clerk 515 Little Canada Road Little Canada, Minn. 55117 484 -2177 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: CITY OF I TTLE CANADA NOTICE OF PROCEDURE RESCIND RESOLUTION NO. 82 -7 -370 MAYOR Raymond Hanson COUNCIL. Michael Fahey Beverly Scalze Dennis Forsberg Mugs Nardini Notice is hereby given that at the Little Canada Council meeting of October 13, 1982 which will be held at 7:30 o'clock P.M. in the Council Chambers of the City Center located at 515 Little Canada Road, a resolution may be introduced to rescind the following resolution: RESOLUTION NO. 82 -7 -370 - DENYING THE RILEY GERVAIS LAKE SECOND ADDITION PRELIMINARY PLAT AS PRESENTED FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: THAT THE PLAT DOES NOT CONFORM TO THE CITY'S ORDINANCE IN THAT IT DOES NOT SHOW DUE REGARD FOR ALL NATURAL FEATURES INCLUDING TOPOGRAPHY, TREE GROWTH, HISTORICAL SPOTS AND NATURAL BOUNDARIES AND DOES NOT RELATE WELL TO THE CHARACTER OF THE EXISTING NEIGHBORHOOD AND THIS ACTION IS BASED ON WHAT THE COUNCIL BELIEVES SHOULD BE CON- SISTENT TREATMENT OF ALL DEVELOPMENTS ON THE LAKE, SPECIFICALLY THE GERVAIS SHORES DEVELOPMENT AND THE DIANNA LANE DEVELOPMENT AND INDICATING TO MR. KROISS THAT THE COUNCIL WOULD HAVE NO OBJECTION TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROPERTY WITH REGARDS TO THE PROPOSED LOTS 1 AND 4 AND WITH LOTS 2 AND 3 COMBINED. All persons desiring to be heard with reference to this matter will be given an opportunity to be heard. %tZ<ek Clerk ris THE KROISS HEARING - OCTOBER 13, County of Ramsey Land Records Division Court House St. Paul, MN 55102 Gordon Forbes 601 Co. Rd. B2 E. St. Paul, MN 55117 Irma J. Wirtz 97 George St. E. St. Paul, MN 55107 Frederick W. & Bette Smith 633 Co. Rd. B2 E. St. Paul, MN 55117 Eugene A. & Joyce B. VanGuilder 606 Co. Rd. B2 E. St. Paul, MN 55117 Dolores W Brodie 600 Co. Rd. B2 E St. Paul, MN 55117 Clifford M & Violet V Hill 2359 Edgerton St. St. Paul, MN 55117 1982 Donald J & Marie S Lackner 2373 Edgerton St. St. Paul, MN 55117 Victor J & Lorraine B Ziolkowski 2381 Edgerton St. St. Paul, MN 55117 William P & Mary E Davis 2395 Edgerton St. St. Paul, MN 55117 Leo E & Marcella M Anthone 594 Co. Rd. B2 St. Paul, MN 55117 Eugene R & Teresa LaVaque 588 Co Rd B2 E St. Paul, MN 55117 John T & Amy Lackner 580 E Co Rd B2 St. Paul, MN 55117 Robert M & Lenora A Tuerk 10152 Butternut St NW Mpls, MN 55433 Corporation of the President Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of the LatterDay Saints 336 3rd St. SE Salt Lake City, Utah RAY KROISS 2350 EDGERTON STREET LITTLE CANADA, MN 5511.7 8 GORDON FORBES n n/� %Carney al jaw 303 HANOVER BUILDING 480 CEDAR STREET SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 TELEPHONE'' 224 -5447 October 6, 1982 Mr. Joseph G. Chlebeck City Clerk City of Little Canada 515 Little Canada Road Little Canada, Minnesota Dear Mr. Chlebeck: 55117 ISMI7L) OCT 7 1982 CITY OF LITTLE CANADA I an writing this letter at the request of Mr. Ray Kroiss, who has pending u proposal for a certain platting in the Riley Gervais Lake Second Addition. Mr. Kroiss has met with me and showed me the proposal in its entirety. It is my understanding that the measurement and areas involved are in no way a violation of City ordinance standards. After consideration of all the elements involved, I wish to advise as a neighbor whose property (601 E. County Road B -2) abuts this property that I have no objection to the Kroiss proposal. You have my permission to enter this letter into the minutes of the Council hearing to be held on October 13, 1982. I will be out of the city on that date and unable to participate. Therefore, the reason for this letter. Very truly yours, GF:HEM cc: Mr. Ray Kroiss N ORB MEMORANDUM TO: ;-/Liethi dadigaiii.2 62. LE241-Z-4 FROM: DATE: FILE 1. 7.1. () (-2:2_i39-- W.Zebare_Al I 2-) NORTHWES1 ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS Incorporated 4820 Minnetonka Boulevard, Suite 420 Mpls., Mn. 55416 612/925-9420 1,,,dienati-A,Hai _eta_ La_..e_ -al) 0. 46(4,2 y.' ...4 ..lit /1 . , _. i„ 1 rtZt11-4 "Le e' --likle, 4, --( C-CELL 7V-6)-4-- ni-a-0 ilge_as,„ 7,1-t.072,:nce.4„, &/ ..._ ),,, i . 7 _‘-44 aL _42,2 f (:(1 cXcz 7vi AasiALeigteaLa ---/ JejacL,- cr ,:;1‘ C2- /3,866 1,add...1( 59- rte-Le-d Kr67.-, • P, & nr:at.„.C_J t& Lt4a4ULLfl47 z./- ji( a Ce ezz a-Pet/Le_ r 1,6 N 041 S 1 'v' A A t:I 13 0 t I'fj hipQ vI!-2: +.oa Liquor Control 081,100 r nmldm9 400 Cedar sumo STATE OF MINNESOTA (612/ Pew, 206•6139 9om 83101 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO ONLY ALLOW CONSUMPTION & DISPLAY OF INTOXICATING LIQUOR (This Application Shall Be Typewritten and Submitted Before June 1st of each Vear) In answering the following questions "APPLICANT" shall be governed as follows: For a Partnership, one of the partners shall execute this application for all members of the partnership. For a Corporation, one of titer shall execute this application for all officers, directors. and stockholders. For a Club, one of the club officers shall execute this application for all the members. If additional space is required, use a separate sheet of paper, indicating by number the question answered. (FEE FOR PERMIT — S456BBF EVERY QUESTION MUST BE ANSWERED 1. 1, -)a.,Ff.,A. if d11et ktrtue, as Ursbliov` (Moron m of pods" making nnolicnrionl (Individual wn pa Inn , of mm. clM1 o mt nr for and in behalf of r :,.LHC1+ -h. frYJma v. IMy,nll, m4. of partners, name of corOOretlon, or name of club) hereby apply for a permit allowing consumption and display of intoxicating, liquor to be located at 1-/a5 b- (. Hlc Cc.vtdal Pa- Municipality of U tile. (ar44J_.e._. (Street 0010,00, one /o; Lot one °lock number) ) Post Office of <01 f1' . ft. Zip Code �� /' County of /(o ffaC +/ rro.nfNln and Section) State of Minnesota, in accordance with the provisions of M.S. 340.119. Tel. No. .22i2 `isd Oros code) 2. Will business he operated as a private club or public place _. RubGc Riacc» 3. State type of business A r -; L/<t 4. FOR A PUBLIC BUSINESS: If a partnership, state name and address of each member of partnership; if a corporation, state name and address of officers and directors. do fa it ti 111 VO''lAvs :¢Srr 1 N,amm IAddrestl �.'C /S, 4 ft- 'pi z l t .¢4z', ci (Namnl udarmfl Natl )0: ,(iaSri 71>a y;s.a S.1- S'tfaI.U,1'Yfn ,5-s u,3 5,5.100703 fietl - ,Crl Jt— .3TIrur1 /-II'S Sll ././1 44 t r•.l df -1;i1 fl)a hill = Shd INnmol IA01000001 5. FOR A PRIVATE CLUB: Date club was organized is club incorporated number of members length of time in present location is club building owned or rented what is the membership dues what are the requirements for membership Does club maintain lockers to be used by members for storing intoxicating liquor . Names of all officers and /or directors of the club: I Nmmnl Norco) (Nnmm) lnddrntf) (Address) (Aderotn INemel Inddrefel Enclose with this application a copy of the Constitution and By-Laws of the club and current list of bona fide members. 6. If applicant or any partner, corporation officer or director, club officer or director, is not a citizen of the United States, list such noncitizens- -' --"' 7. State name of person who will operate or manage business: Or; ft mart J< >ti I 5)artr:en .. nom J Inee..o) N8. 0n what floor is the establishment located, or to he located Z. t`■ (.'rf 9. How are the premises classified under the zoning ordinance lu'-> l - -cct I )CLCL Approved for Violations by: DO NOT USE Check 1 0 Cash Rec,t. Reid. by Cashier 10. State name and address of owner or owners of building wherein the business will be located: �• i1 U I D. I/ kuk o1RS1 Yhtkr; 1 Si 1 3 INe,rol c, 4/ �H L(F, )in S5q (nddreeal 11. Has applicant; if partnership, any partner; if corporation, any officer or director; if club, any club officer or director, ever had a license under the Minnesota Liquor Control Act revoked or suspended or been convicted for any violation of State Laws or local ordinances; if so, give date and details n U 12. Is applicant; if partnership, any partner; if corporation, any officer or director; if club, any club officer or director, a member of the governing body of the municipality or county in which this permit is to be issued; if so, in what capacity (1,r t 13. Has applicant; if partnership, any partner; if corporation, any officer or director; if club, any club officer or director, any interest whatsoever, directly or indirectly, in any liquor establishment in the State of Minnesota ,1.0 . Give name and address of such establishment 14. Furnish the name and address of at least three business references, including one bank reference: (.;r' 1 Nlf'■ IC ; >(a _)' ,,t- Li file pane an_ '. T. �Lre :zr—' Ll l{'I P_ Lu vmx CC (Nnnel � :1 � (Address) I I ) y� q 11 Interne) II it; Cr /f!'F� U(4. (. VF(.;t 1 A re SIP e (nudrem �7 F'l A)lec� �4. Q � � 41,A !Q Pt�a.It /lve$ (s INnmm (Address) 15. Will intoxicating liquor be sold on the premises U 16. (a) State whether application is: 1. Original ✓ 2. Renewal 3. Transfer (b) Former licensee's name "— trade name 17. Are the premises now occupied, or to be occupied, entirely separate and exclusive from any other business establishment 1'`.0 n / 18. State trade name to be used L,; N-le- f2av o.. a. ke4v ?ca /-Aa I r 19. State whether an "On -Sale" or "Off-Sale" Nom(ntoxicating Malt Beverage License has or will be granted in conjunction to this business and for the same premises Perk nY 'DLL; 20. Has there been issued, or will there be issued, a $54.00 Federal Retail Liquor Dealer's Special Tax Stamp for the sale of liquor on these premises 71 21. Has your local government an ordinance regulating the consumption and display of intoxicating liquor 22. If operating under zoning ordinance how is location of building classified 05(c(PrLEx.g E3c'. 'rte, • 1 hereby certify that 1 have read and understand every question In this avpn<eunn, and that the a of my own knowledge. 1 further understand that the giving of false information In this application, or the tenure to give pertinent informaton constitutes cause for the mediote revocation of this permit. 1' 15 FURTHER UNDERSTOOD THAT ANY PERMIT ISSUED HEREUNDER DOES NOT ALLOW THE SALE OF INTOXICATING LIOUOR. Enclosed Is payment of 5150.00 payable to the Liquor Control Director as provided by M.S. 19NT, Section 3130]19. NO CONSIDERATION WILL BE GIVEN TO THIS APPLICATION UNLESS APPROVED AS HEREINAFTER PROVIDED: If applicant is located in the County, the Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners or his Representative shall approve both copies of the application. (clm,mnn, ooerd of County comma, loner, or bit noa,0,,,, ye) If applicant is located in a Municipality, the President of the Council or his Representative shall approve both copies of this application. (F,mldent nr the cannel a, hl. Pen,a,enunve) L11'7l/[', ! na /n4 (Name of Esteelhhmentl (Stgneture of nuthorlard Applicant) Subscribed and sworn to before me this _ day of 19 . (Nolen, Public) My Commission expires 1. guests and where, in consideration of payment therefor, meals are regularly served at tables to the general public and which employs an adequate staff to provide the usual and suitable service to its guests. 2. "On sale wine licenses" shall mean licenses authorizing the sale of wine not exceeding 14% alcohol by volume, for consumption on the licensed premises only, in conjunction with the sale of food. (b) License Application. Any person desiring a special " license" shall make his verified application in writing to the and shall file the same with the City Clerk. Such application require that the following information be provided as well as information as may be required by the State Liquor Control Commis City Council or City Clerk: on sale wine City Council form shall such further sioner, the 1. The name and place of residence of applicant. 2. The location of the premises upon which the applicant proposes to sell such wine and an exact description of the particular place within the building where such sales will take place. The application shall be signed and verified by applicant in person, and if applicant is a corporation, by an officer of the corporation. Upon receipt of the application and the license fee, provided, the City Clerk shall deliver applicant a receipt receipt shall contain a statement of the purpose of said fee. (c) bond in the approved and Bond. No special "on sale wine license" shall be amount of Three Thousand Dollars ($3,000.00) has filed by and with the proper City Officials. as hereinafter therefor, which granted until a been furnished, (d) License fees. The license fee is hereby fixed at ehe sum of One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) per year and shall be subject to the conditions in this Chapter governing liquor license fees. (Source: Ord. 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 48, 55, Amended: Ord. 20, 43, 48, 56, 87, 96, 112, 123, 132) 704. BOTTLE CLUBS: INTOXICATING LIQUOR 704.010. PERMIT AND FEE. Whenever any pe corporation, owning or operating any private club or permit from the State Liquor Control Commissioner ..i Statutes, Section 340.14, Subdivisi-- 2 paragraph c, rson, association, or public place, obtains a pursuant to Minnesota such applicant shall be required to obtain a permit -from the City and the fee for such permit shall be Three Hundred Dollars ($300.00) fo) any one year or any part thereof expiring On the subsequent - July- lst -nexf "following the issuance of such license and said permit must be renewed annually on July lst; provided that if such permit is applied for by a non - profit organization or by a governmental unit, the operation of which is determined by the Council to be of civic benefit to the City, then and in that case the Council may authorize the issuance of a permit to such non - profit organization or governmental unit at an annual fee of no less than Five Dollars ($5.00) per year. - -, 704.020. APPLICATION. Application for such permit shall be made to the City Clerk. Such application shall be based upon a pending application with the Liquor Control Commissioner and the Clerk shall issue said license if he is notified by the Liquor Control Commissioner that the Liquor Control Commissioner intends to issue a license pursuant to said Section 340.14, Subdivision 3, Paragraph c. 704.030. LIQUOR CONTROL COMMISSIONER. Upon final passage and publication of this Chapter the Clerk shall forward a copy to the Liquor Control Commissioner of the State of Minnesota, advising him that the City has imposed this permit fee pursuant to authority granted by Minnesota Statutes 340.14, Subdivision 3, Paragraph c. 704.040. VIOLATION. Any person who exercises the privileges provided by Minnesota Statute, Section 340.14, Subdivision 3, without first having obtained a permit from the City Clerk, as provided in this Chapter, shall upon conviction thereof be guilty of a misdemeanor. (Source: Ord. 49.) Roseville Area Schools Arden Hills, Falcon Heights, Lauderdale, Little Canada, Maplewood, Roseville, Shoreview District 623 October 1, 1982 Mayor Raymond Hanson city of Little Canada 515 East Little Canada Road Little Canada, MN 55117 Dear Mayor Hanson: SCHOOL BOARD Walter Parsons, Jr., Chairman David E. Monson, Clerk Donald E. Bauman, Treasurer Joanne Cushman, Director John Duncan, Director Gary Trifle, Director Dr. Lloyd C. Nielsen Superintendent Last month District 623 received notice of an assessment due to the City of Little Canada. The purpose of this letter is to follow up our subsequent conversation on the matter. At that time, I raised the question of whether the Council of the City of Little Canada might wish to recognize the use of school district land that has been available to the City for park purposes for a number of years, by an adjustment in the assessment. Such action would serve to reenforce the cooperative spirit that both parties have contributed to in the past. Thank you for your consideration. jg 13 Lloyd C. Nielsen Superintendent 1251 WEST COUNTY ROAD B-2 / ROSEVILLE, MINNESOTA 55113 -3299 /TELEPHONE: 612- 633 -8150 CITY OF LITTLE CANADA RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA Office of: JOSEPH G. CHLEBECK, Clerk 515 Little Canada Road Little Canada, Minn. 55117 494 -2177 September 3, 1982 4 33 . SU, Dr. Lloyd C. Nielsen, Superintendent Roseville School District No. 623 1251 W. County Road B -2 Roseville, Minnesota 55113 RE: Termination of Deferred Assessments Dear Dr. Nielsen: MAYOR Raymond Hanson COUNCI L Michael Fahey Beverly Stain Dennis Forsberg Mugs Nordin' Since Kellogg High School has connected to the Little Canada Municipal sewer system, the City of Little Canada proposes to terminate the following deferred assessments: Parcel No. 53- 55400- 011 -04 in the amount of $9,562.50 Parcel No. 53- 55200- 094 -03 in the amount of $1,292.00 Parcel No. 53- 55400- 040 -04 in the amount of $3,697.50 Total amount of deferred assessments: $ 14,552.00 If the Council should adopt this termination you would have from September 8, 1982 to October 8, 1982 to pay the amount in full. After that if the amount is not maid the assessment will be billed yearly at an interest rate of 6% of .ne unpaid balance. JC:bj If you have any questions concerning this matter, please call me. Yours sincerely, Joseph G. Chlebeck Clerk City of Little Canada 14 ..ctrl„, sa THOMAS M. SWEENEY JAMES J. O'CONNOR JOHN H. LeMAY GEORGE F. BORER SWEENEY, O'CONNOR Si. LeMAY PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION ATTORNEYS AT LAW (612) 2222541 October 5, 1982 Mr. Joseph G. Chlebeck City Clerk 515 Little Canada Road Little Canada, Minnesota 55117 RE: North Payne Avenue Addition Drainage Easements Our File No. 4592 Dear Joe: SUITE 350 NORTHERN FEDERAL BUILDING SIXTH AND WABASHA ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55102 We thought we would bring you up to date on the status of the easements on North Payne Avenue Properties. As of today, that is as follows: 1. We have obtained and recorded 19 easements out of the 29 required in the project. Eight of these properties have mortgages on them,and no mortgagee's consent has yet been obtained. 2. We have in our possession two executed and recordable easements, but the owners in those cases will not re- lease to us the Owner's Duplicate Certificate of Title. Both of these properties have mortgages on them. 3. We have seven executed and unrecordable easements, all of which have mortgages on the properties, and the property owners in these cases have so far failed to or refused to send us new recordable easements, and Owner's Duplicate Certificates of Title. 4. We have one property where an easement has never been signed, and that property also has a mortgage on it. In the case of the unrecordable easements, it is probable that these easements may be enforceable against the present property owners, but if not recorded prior to a transfer of the real estate, it is definite they would not be enforceable against a subsequent purchaser without notice. 15 Mr. Joseph G. Chlebeck October 5, 1982 Page Two There remain two questions, the first being the interest of the City in spending additional legal time and resources on the obtaining of the balance of the easements, several of whom have indicated substantial resistance to granting the City the easement. The second question is that of the necessity for obtaining Consents to Easement by the various mortgagees who may have interests in the property, which are prior to the City's recorded interest by virtue of the easement. As to the second question, the process would be to communicate by mail with each of the mortgagees involved, explain to them the granting of the easement by the individual property owner, and request that they execute and return to us the Consent to Easement, which would subject their mortgage to the terms of the easement. The potential problem with not obtaining a Consent to Easement on Torrens property, is that in the event of foreclosure by the mortgagee, the mortgagee would take title to the property, which would not be subject to the easement by the City. We are not able to assess the likelihood of foreclosure on any one or more of the properties, nor can we make any present judgments concerning whether the mortgagee, subsequent to a foreclosure, would at that time, grant to the City an easement for the existing drainage ditch. While it has always been our policy, in other municipalities that we represent, to attempt to obtain such consents by mortgagees, sometimes it is impossible and not feasible. It is indeed difficult to make any firm estimate as to the amount of time necessary to secure Consents to Easement, but our experience indicates that many times such requests become misplaced in financial institutions and we find it necessary to do a significant am.,'Int of correspondence to finally accomplish that objective. We would ask that you discuss this matter with the Council, and advise us on what action, if any, you wish us to take. We have been receiving telephone calls from various property owners concerning the location of the Owner's Duplicate Certificates of Title, and we are hesitant to return those Certificates to them until a decision is made as to whether or not we will be obtaining Consents to Easements from the respective mortgagees. We sincerely appreciate your cooperation in this matter, and look forward to hearing from you at your early convenience. Sincerely yours, SWEEI4EY,' 'CONNOR & LEMAY i if; John H.,. LeMay JHL:peg J.C. HAMMOND 695 E. County Road B2 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55117 October 5, 1982 Mayor Raymond Hanson and City Council Members City Hall 515 Little Canada Road Little Canada, Minnesota 55117 Mr. Cliff Aichinger Ramsey-Washington Metro Watershed District Post Office Box 2128 St. Paul, MN 55109 Mr. Donald 0. Carley, P.E. Vice President Milner W. Carley & Assoc., Inc. 500 West Highway 96 St. Paul, MN 55112 Bruce A. Folz and Associates 14791 - 60th St. Stillwater, MN 55082 Dear Ladies and Gentlemen: I suggested to Little Canada that they enlarge the lagoon in front of my house to my Eastern boundary line. At the same time I suggested they widen and deepen the drainage canal between my two lots and excavate another similar canal on the eastern boundary of my eastern lot. I felt this would impove the drainage of the whole area as well as to provide additional water storage. Besides these benefits it was agreed that it would improve the beauty of the area as the people on Greenbrier Circle would be looking out on a small lake instead of rank weeds and marsh grass. This was accepted as a good idea by Little Canada and,of course, they had to clear it through you. It hasn't worked out to be quite the scenic plus that we had in mind because they merely skimmed off the top layer instead of going deep enough to provide a water area in all seasons as I did when I created the lake in the first place. Instead, in the dry period of the Summer, the residents of Greenbrier Circle, looked out on a mud flat -then when the rains came the weeds grew up and now they are looking out on a weed and water covered mud flat. 1 Water Shed District Mayor of Little Canada and City Council October 5, 1982 Page Two Another factor agreed to by experts is that this mud morass is somewhat like quick sand as the top mud layer could provide a danger to anyone who fell in it, be they adult or child. I think for appearance sake, for safety sake, and for increased water storage, we must put in a drag line this Winter and complete the half - finished job. Sincerely, 67/4-47-721-/-7247-7d Jas r C. Hammond 695 East Co. Rd.B2 St. Paul, MN 55117 P.S. This does not affect us personally as it cannot be seen from our house, but it is an eyesore to the residents of Greenbrier Circle. JCH /lh 1 H 0,04ESOrq o r ti Minnesota Department of Transportation District 9 stir ye 3485 Hadley Avenue North, Box 2050 OP1 North St. Paul, Minnesota 35109 October 5, 1982 Mr. Joseph G. Chlebeck City Clerk 515 Little Canada Road Little Canada, Minnesota 55117 In reply refer to: 319 S.P. 6280 (T.H. 35E) Little Canada Storm Water Impr. 81 -15 Pond and Pumping System N.W. Corner.T.H. 36 and 35E Dear Mr. Chlebeck: grompNi OCT 7 1982 CITY OF LITTLE CANADA (61 2) 770 -2311 We have completed our review of the above referenced preliminary plan for a pond and pump facility as requested in your letter of September 8, 1982. We concur in your determination that 11.6 acres of highway right of way are draining to the pond. On this basis the proposed improvement would be eligible for Mn /DOT cost participation. Mn /DOT cost responsibility could be met through assessments in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 435.19 (a copy is attached) or by a cooperative construction agreement. The amount of Mn /DOT cost participation would be determined after a review of final plans and computation considering the following criteria: 1. The system provides a positive outlet for highway drainage. 2. The system is designed to safely discharge a 100 year frequency rainfall event. 3. The physical appurtenances of the system, including the pond, is 1Jcated on publicly owned right of way. 4. Maintenance of the system would be the responsibility of the City. Maintenance access to the system cannot be provided from the highway. In addition, before any construction is allowed in this area a construction permit must be obtained from this office. There are utilities in the area and Mn /DOT has an existing right of way fence and frontage road that will require restoration or protection from this construction. Final plans would be required before any construction permit could be issued. An Equal Opportunity Employer Joseph G. Chlebeck October 5, 1982 Page Two rLi771P] IS 13; 0CT 7 1982 CITY OF LITTLE CANADA If you have any questions feel free to contact John Sandahl, Assistant District Engineer, at 770 -2311, extension 241. Sincerely, K.:K. McRae,:P.E. District Engineer 20 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 7 1982 Minnesota Statutes 1961, Section 435.19 435.19 SPECIAL; GOVERNMENTAL UNITS. Subdivision 1. Any citylniaivavoA DA organized, any village or borough, or any town having authority to levy special assessments may levy special assessments against the property of a governmental unit benefited by an improvement to the same extent as if such property were privately owned, .but no such assessments, except for storm sewers and drain systems, shall be levied against a governmental unit for properties used or to be used for highway rights of way. A "governmental unit" means a county, city, village, borough, town, public corporation, a school district and any other political subdivision, except a city of the first class operating under a home rule charter and the school district, park board or other board or department of such city operating under such charter. If the amount of any such assessment, except one against property of the state, is not paid when due, it may be recovered in a civil action brought by the city, village, borough or such town against the governmental unit owning the property so assessed. Subd. 2. In the case of property owned by the state or any instrumentality thereof, the governing body of the city, village, borough or town may determine the amount that would have been assessed had the land been privately owned. Such determination shall be made only after the governing body has held a hearing on the proposed assessment after at least two weeks' notice of the hearing has been given by registered or certified mail to the head of the instrumentality, department or agency having jurisdiction over the property. The amount thus determined may be paid by the instrumentality, department or agency from available. 'funds. If no funds are available and such instrumentality, department or agency is supported in whole or in part by appropriations from the general revenue fund, then it shall include in its next budget request the amount thus determined. No instrumentality, department or agency shall be bound by the determination of the governing body and may pay from available funds or recommend payment in such lesser . amount as it determines is the measure of the benefit received by the land from the improvement. Subd. 3. In the case of property owned by a city of the first class or board or instrumentality thereof, the governing body of any city, village, borough or town may determine the amount that would have been assessed had the land been privately owned. Such determination shall be made only after the governing body has held a hearing on the proposed assessment after at least two weeks' notice of the hearing has been given by certified mail to the city or its instrumentality operating the property. Such city of the first class or board or instrumentality thereof may pay the amount so determined or such lesser amount as it determines is the measure of the benefit received by the land from the improvement. In addition to any authority now possessed by the park board of any such city of the first class to levy taxes it may levy upon the taxable property of such city a tax sufficient to raise the amount so determined as the benefit to the property owned or operated by such park board. Subd. 4. When any local improvement has been heretofore made and special assessments have been levied to finance all or part of the cost of such improvement under any law or charter not expressly authorizing assessments against public property, any,: governmental unit owning property benefited by such improvement may pay to the city,ir? village, borough or town making the improvement the 'amount of any benefit received ' therefrom not in excess of the amount that would have been assessable against such property were it privately owned. ' Subd. 5. This section shall not modify any law or charter provision authorizing the imposition of special assessments against governmental units.' ' City Council City of Little Canada 515 E. Little Canada Rd. Little Canada, Minn Dear Council Members: 500 West Highway 96 St. Paul. Minnesota 55112 484 -3301 400 E. St. Germain St. St. Cloud, Minnesota 56301 251 -7751 314 Oak Street Sauk Centre, Minnesota 56378 352-3664 October 6, 1982 RE: Final Acceptance Impr. 81 -14 S. Owasso Blvd. S.A.P. 200 - 102 -03 We have reviewed the work done on the above project and find that it is acceptable. We are attaching the final estimate for the work done. We would recommend final acceptance. Very truly yours, MILNER)W. CARLEY & A-&'$OCIATES, INC. r Donald 0. Carley, Vice Pres. DOCsj1 City Council City of Little Canada 515 E. Little Canada Rd. Little Canada, Minn 55117 Item No. 2105.501 2105.525 2211.501 2341.504 2341.598 2341.510 2357.502 2503.511 2503.521 2503.511 2506.508 2506.509 2506.516 2506.522 504.602 2531.501 2575.505 500 West Highway 96 St. Paul. Minnesota 55112 484-3301 Bid . Description Quantity Common Excavation •1221 C.Y. Topsoil Borrow LV 316 C.Y Agg. Base, C1.5 1725 Ton Bit. Mat. for Mix 100 Ton Wearing Course Mix 550 Ton Binder Course Mix 1350 Ton Bit Mat for Tack 560 Gal. 12" RCP, Cl 3 1142 L.F. 22" Span RCP Arch 425 L.F. Bore or Jack 12" RCP 48 L.F. Const. MH, Design A 6 Each Const. CB, Design LP 4 Each Cstg. Assbly 10 Each Adj. Frame & Ring Cstg 3 Each Adj. G.V. Boxes 6 Each Conc C & G, B 613 329D L.F. Sod 3809 S.Y. 400 E. St. Germain St. St. Cloud. Minnesota 56301 251-7751 314 Oak Street Sauk Centre, Minnesota 56378 352-3664 October 6, 1982 RE: FINAL ESTIMATE Proj: So. Owasso Blvd. S.A.P. 290- 102 -03 Cont: Total Asphalt Const. Quantity Todate 221 C.Y. 192 C.Y. 837 Ton 79.5 Ton 692 Ton 967 Ton 625 Gal. 1140.5 L.F. 435 L.F. 48 L.F. 6 Each 4 Each 10 Each 3 Each 6 Each 3118 L.F. 2450 S.Y. Unit Price Total 10.00 $ 2,210.00 6.00 1,.152.00 6.82 5,708.34 175.00 13,912.50 12.45 3,615.40 11.80 11,410.60 1.30 812.50 17.50 19,953.75 24.50 10,657.50 83.00 3,984.00 675.00 4,050.00 1050.00 4,200.00 150.00 1,500.00 90.00 720.00 50.00 300.00 4.69 14,623.42 1.09 2,670.50 TOTAL VALUE OF WORK TODATE . . . $ 106,485.51 LESS PREVIOUS ESTIMATES 101,161.24 AMOUNT DUE THIS FINAL ESTIMATE . . $ 5,324.27 APPROVED: MILNER W. CARLEY & ASSOCIATES, INC. BY: /i �i�a�'l (/ r Donald 0. Carley, P.E. Vice es. 23 IC•134 Minnesota Department of Revenue (Rev. 7/80) Centennial Office Building St. Paul, Minnesota 55145 Affidavit For Obtaining Final Settlement Of Contract With The State Of Minnesota And Any Of Its Political Or Governmental Subdivisions Name of Contractor or Subcontractor Total Asphalt Construction Co. Business Address 475 W. Minnehaha Avenue City, Town or Post Office St. Paul Read the instructions on the other side before completing the form. Minnesota Identification Number 8465207 !State IZip Code Minnesota 55103 Project Location So Owasso Boulevard Name of State Department of Governmental Subdivision for Which Work Was Performed City of Little Canada Address of Department or Subdivision 515 E. Little Canada Road Statement On Withholding Of Income Taxes On Wages Paid (A) Contractor or Subcontractor — If you pay or supervise the payment of persons employed on this contract or project, you are a contractor or subcontractor and should complete this section. ICity, Town or Post Office Little Canada IZip Code 55117 Project or Contract Number SAP 200 - 102 -03 Total Amount of Contract $106,485.51 Amount Still Due 35,324.27 1, Edward J. under the penalties of Kieger, Sr. (Title) (Your name) perjury and criminal liability, that as provided in Minnesota Statute President payment of the persons employed by Total Asphalt Construction Company (Contractor or subcontractor) employed by the above contractor or subcontractor were subjected to withholding as provided that all money withheld and all returns required by this section, to date, have been properly properly filed with the Commissioner of Revenue. �- r / /1,(D el (You signat declare 290.97, 1 pay or supervise the • that the wages of all employees in Minnesota Statute 290.92 and deposited or paid and all returns (B) Prime Contractor — If any portion of the above project has been subcontracted, certify below that you have received a certificate of compliance (Form IC-134) from each of the subcontractors involved. President , declare ), Edward J. Kieger urn Sr. (Tine) (Your name) under the penalties of perjury and criminal liability, that as provided in Minnesota Statute 290.97, I have obtained certificates of compliance from all of my subcontractors, on this project or contract, stating that all of their employees were subjected to withholding as provided in Minnesota Statute 290.92 and that as required by this section, all money was properly deposited or paid and all returns were filed with the Commissioner of Revenue as of the date of this certification. /C/47f.? a Certificate Of Compliance With Minnesota Statutes 290.92 and 290.97 Based on the facts stated in the above affidavit and the facts in the files and records of the Department of Revenue, I find that the above contractor (subcontractor) has, to date, properly complied with all of the provisions of Minnesota Statute 290.92 relating to the withholding of income tax on wages paid to employees and Minnesota Statute 290.97 relating to contract services with the State or any of its governmental or political subidivisions. OCT 5 1932 (Department of I }evepuel (Date) ) 4 F.231M RECEIPT AND WAIVER OF MECHANICS' LIEN RIGHTS N. B. It is important that the following directions be closely followed as otherwise the receipt WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED. 1. This is a LEGAL INSTRUMENT and must be executed accordingly by officers of corpora- tions and by partners of co-partnershios. 2. It is important that ALL the blanks be completed and that the AMOUNT PAID BE SHOWN. 3. If payment is not in full to date, so state. SHOW UNPAID BALANCE, and strike out last three lines. 4. A receipt similar to this or legal waiver of lien rights will be required for all plumbing, heating and plastering material, etc. 5. NO ERASURES OR ALTERATIONS MUST BE MADE. October 5 ,19 82 (DATE) The undersigned acknowledges having received payment of One Hundred Six Thousand Four Hundred Eighty Four and 51/100 f rom all (Amount Paid) City of Little Canada DOLLARS 4106,485.51. ) (Nara. of Paror) Sewer work and asphalt paving in full payment of (Kind of Material or Labor) by the undersigned delivered or' furnished to (or performed at) So. Owasso Boulevard Little Canada (Street Addr..a or Leal Description) and for value received hereby waives all rights which may have been acquired by the undersigned to file mechanics' liens against said premises for labor, skill or material furnished to said premises prior to the date hereof. Total Asphalt Construction Company PLUMBING, HEATING and PLASTERIG fru �� N contractors must sign statement on reverse hereof 2 r Pkesi 7 Address (TTTLZ) 475 W. Minnehaha Ave., St. Paul, Minn-. 55103 *SON PUBLISHING CO. Legal Publications 20 `) .> A C1E.MBER OF THE BUTTERWORTH PUBLISHING GROUP SOLD TO 'i •� or L. :CI E.I"o4A11A HALL .:!'.i i_rr7L. !`: ,'n,.: (111 f1 I'I'I SHIP TO 366 Wacouta Street St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 (005355 Phone: 612/227-4200 MD Wats: 800/652 -9779 Reg. Wats: 800/328 -9190 Telex: 298 -420 11 f OF LITTLE CANADA CITY HALL 5:15 L.ITI1..I: CANADA RD LITTLE. CANADA MN _15117 CUSTOMER PURCHASE ORDER NO. I (TERMS I 3U DAY APPROVAL I SALES REP. 1. :7 CUSTOMER ACCOUNT NO <.0053 55 SHIP VIA ;A r 1?1> RAY HONSC P.O.B. MARKET CHANNEL 701'5 DATE SEP 22/22 OUR ORDER NO. I', 27270 I.S.B.N. ' Othom V 1 SAC.. ORDERED 0A001 13/0 DESCRIPTION CODE QUC SNIPP(O PRICE DIS 04 6 : "31"i''`i ( ' !. i ') I !1ERDST i J ADRIAN CABLE COMMUNICATIONS EUSLE1 Tr:R K. 15.00 LACK ORDER CODE A - ON r CA STUCK, ALLOW AA VIRLKS 8 . NEE. EDI Don IN APEEAkA DoN C • our OF PU'NT, CADE R CANCELLED 0. NOT •Tr PUE3LISHEO \E - RESTRICTED - Dtl.k' PLEASE QUOTE CUSTOMER ACCOUNT NUMBER AND OUR ORDER NUMBER WHEN MAKING INQUIRIES REGARDING THIS INVOICE. INVOICE PLEASE RETURN REMITTANCE COPY WITH PAYMENT. PLEASE PAY THIS 1 J MASON PUBLISHING COMPANY rEA member of the Butterworth Publishing Group CABLE COMMUNICATIONS NEWSLETTER Volume 1, Number 1 ISSN 0734 -0958 September 1982 INTRODUCTION Welcome to the Cable Communications News- letter. This monthly newsletter is designed to act as a source of information for matters ofa regional interest. The newsletter will focus on pending legislation, agency actions, judicial decisions. and other signifi- cant developments throughout Iowa. Illinois, Minne- sota, Nebraska. North Dakota. Sol uh Dakota. Wiscon- sin. and at the federal level. Each newsletter will also provide practical articles or how -to articles relating to such issues as privacy. franchise fees. interconnection. franchise enforcement, etc. Our next issue, for example, will suggest an orderly way to deal with franchise renewals. We welcome any questions or comments that you may have. We will be running a question and answer column in each newsletter. Please feel free to provide us with any questions that you would like to see addressed. Questions or comments may be sent to me at: Adrian E. Herbst Attorney at Law Herbst & Thue. Ltd. 2030 Northwestern Financial Center 7900 Xerxes Avenue South Bloomington, Minnesota 55431 SENATE COMMITTEE APPROVES CABLE BILL On July 22. 1982, the Senate Commerce Com mi ttee approved the cable telecommunications act of 1982 S. 2172. 97th Cong., 2d Sess. (1982). The action came on a 12 to 3 vote and has increased the concern of municipal officials. This bill, according to the National League of Cities. "preempts state and local authority in most areas of essential concern and prohibits almost all meaningful regulation of cable systems." If enacted, this would, among other things: 1. require that each cable system having twenty or more channels set aside ten percent of the available channels for use by public, educational, and gov- ernmental channel programmers. Available chan- nels are defined as the activated channels, less those channels subject to other requirements (i.e., must -carry rules). 2. exempt those systems with less than twentychan- nels from the access requirements. Existing fran- chises with more stringent access requirements would be grandfathered until the franchise expires or is renegotiated. Any system may petition the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to waive the access requirements if there are "reason- able alternatives for persons desiring to provide programming service to the public ...." 3. authorize municipalities to regulate rates charged by cable operators for basic service. Basic service is defined as the retransmission of broadcast signals and public, educational, and governmental access programming. IN THIS ISSUE • INTRODUCTION • SENATE COMMITTEE APPROVES CABLE BILL • REGIONAL BRIEFS • FRANCHISING TIPS • NATIONAL BRIEFS Cable Communications Newsletter /September 1982 2 4. prohibit municipalities from regulating rates for satellite - delivered programming and telecommun- ications services, such as institutional network services, two -way interactive services, and security services. 5. authorize the FCC to establish a reasonable ceiling for franchise fees paid to a municipality. Franchise - fees would be limited to cover only the cost of local regulation. Franchise fees would not be available for programming support or for general funds. ISSN 0734 -0958 Copyright ©1982 by Mason Publishi ngCotnpany All rights reserved. Cable Communications Newsletteris published monthly by Mason Publishing Company, a mem- ber of the Butterworth Publishing Group. Mailing address: 366 Wacouta Street. St. Paul. Minnesota 55101-1989. Subscription price is 575.00 for one year. EDITOR Adrian E. Herbst Herbst & Thue, Ltd. Attorneys at Law CONTRIBUTING EDITORS Gary R. Matz John F. Gibbs Ann C. Viitala Herbst & Thue. Ltd. Attorneys at Law PUBLISHER EDITOR Kathleen A. Prior Mason publications are designed to provide ac- curate and current information with regard to the subject matter covered. They are intended to help attorneys and other professionals maintain their professional competence. Publications are sold with the understanding that Mason is not engaged in rendering legal. accounting, or other professional advice. If legal services or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought. Attor- neys using Mason publications in dealing with specific legal matters should also research orig- inal sources of authority. 6. require automatic franchise renewal provided t hat the company has substantially complied with the material terns of the franchise: provided that there has been no change in t he legal. technical, or financial qualifications ul'the company that would substantially impair the continued service: and provided that the services and facilities provided by the company are reasonable in light of the size. nature. needs, and interests of the community to be served. 7. prohibi1 the municipal ownershipofcablesystems, unless the city has acquired the system at fair - market value. Except fur the access channel ceiling. local fran- chises would not be grand fathered from the impact of the bill. Municipalities would have sixty days to bring the existing franchise into compliance. An amendment offered by Senator Howard W. Gannon. D -Nev., would have eliminated all federal, state. and local regulation of cable within five years. This was defeated by the Senate Continent Committee by an 11 to 4 vote. According to Senator I3arry Goldwater's office, R- Ariz., the sponsor of S. 2172. 97th Cong., 2d Sess. (1982), no date has been set for floor action. It is hoped. however. that the Senate will hear the bill after the August recess. REGIONAL BRIEFS ► The Minnesota Cable Comtiutnications Board (MCCB) ruled at its March 12. 1982. meeting that existing MCC[3 rules do not prohibit the use of sponsorships or advertisements on the state -man- dated access channels. The use of sponsorships or advertisements on these channels is now at the discretion of the municipality. Some believe that spon- sorships or advertisements offer a new source of revenue for nonprofit access corporations and other entities responsible for access programming. I. The state of Wisconsin recently enacted its first significant privacy legislation for cable communica- tions systems. Wisconsin Statutes § 134.43. among other things. requires a cable communications com- pany to obtain written consent of the subscriber prior to monitoring the subscriber's equipment. prior to releasing any information that may reasonably lead to the disclosure of any aspect of the subscriber's be- havior. and prior to conducting research that requires the response of a subscriber or any member of the subscriber's household. A Cook County Circuit Court has enjoined Omni - com of Illinois from constructing its cable system in Highland Park. Illinois. A local homeowner filed the 3 suit challenging the right of the city to allow private companies to use homeowners' public utility ease- ments and the authority of the city to grant rights -of- way on public property to private companies. • A rule proposed by the MCCB would assure cable communications systems reasonable access to multi- ple, dwelling units and manufactured home parks. One draft of the rule, rewritten in light of the United States Supreme Court decision in Loretto, contem- plated the property owner being reimbursed for per- mitting the installation of cable communications facilities on or within the property owner's property in an amount not to exceed one percent of the gross subscriber revenues derived from the premises. The hoard. at i is August 13 meeting. voted to delete the one percent language in favor of compensation being negotiated by the landlord and the cable company. The next step is for the proposed rule to be heard by a hearing examiner. • A national conference. entitled Upgrading Cable Systems: Renegotiating. Renewal. Rebuilding or Re- franchising, is scheduled for October 11 -12, 1982, at the Sheraton Inn and Conference Center in Madison, Wisconsin. Additional information may be obtained by contacting Barry Orton. associate professor of telecommunications. 220 Lowell Hall, 610 Langdon Street, Madison, Wisconsin 53706:608- 262 -2394. • The Federal Communications Commission (FCC). in a memorandum opinion and order released August 6. 1982, denied a petition filed by General Electric ' ablevision Corporation of Bartonville. Illinois. and Peoria Heights. Illinois, requesting authorization to pay the respective municipalities a ten- percent fran- chise fee. In denying the petition. the commission cited the company's willingness to pay the fees and the company's statement that the fee would not impair cable operations, but the commission, nevertheles held that no showing had been made by either muniL:- pality that such a fee "is appropriate in light of the planned local regulatory program." • The city of Minot, North Dakota, recently advertised nationally the availability of a request for proposal to provide cable communications service to the city. Cable TV of Minot, a Telecommunications, Inc. subsid- iary. has held the franchise for the past fifteen years. The city sought to avoid possible antitrust actions by advertising nationally for other applicants. The present franchisee, Cable TV of Minot. has already submitted a proposal. • A Pawnee county court. Nebraska. has ruled that a cable communications drop is taxable as personal property. The dispute centered on whether a cable drop should be treated as a fixture and thus taxable as real property to the subscriberoras personal property and taxable to the company. TV Transmission. Inc. has indicated that an appeal will be made. A decision Cable Communications Newsletter /September 1982 from the Nebraska supreme court is not expected for approximately one year. • At itsJune 11, 1982, meeting the MCCB ruled that a Mankato. Minnesota. firm is operating a cable communications system and not a master antenna system as the firm claimed. Mid - America Satellite TV, Inc. has been offering six broadcast stations and five satellite signals to an apartment complex in Mankato. Under MCCB regulations and Minnesota Statutes § 238.02. a master antenna television system is excluded from the definition of a cable communications system. The MCCB's decision emphasized, however, that mas- ter antenna systems are allowed to transmit only broadcast or "non- satellite" signals. It is not clear at this time what the consequences of the MCCB ruling will be. The firm could eliminate the satellite signals and thus conform to the MCCB's interpretation of a master antenna system or the city of Mankato could grant a cable communications franchise to Mid - America. In the meantime, Mid - America is seeking - judicial relief. • The Illinois legislature recently passed a bill de- signed to promote the wiring of condominium com- plexes. H. 2284. 82nd Gen. Assembly, permits cable communications systems to wire condominium com- plexes on a majority vote of the individual condo- minium owners. No compensation provision is in- cluded. The bill was signed into law on August 19, 1982. FRANCHISING TIPS Our community has received three proposals to provide cable communications service to the city. Each proposal contains a variety of interactive services. Some questions have been raised as to whether these services will intrude on the sub- scriber's privacy. What can we, as a city, do to ensure that the subscriber's privacy is respected? A. The issue of the subscriber's right of privacy has become increasingly significant with the emerg- ence of the state -of- the -art interactive systems now being proposed and even constructed. Never before has one entity been in such a position to collect and maintain a rich data base on each subscriber. This information could include what goods we purchase, how we spend our money, and even when we are away from our homes for purposes of security monitoring. There are two significant steps a franchising authority should take to protect this right of privacy. First, the request for proposal or invitation for application should ask the applicant to clearly describe its policy on privacy and to describe in detail what steps. if any. the applicant will take to '!tt Cable Communications Newsletter /September 1982 4 protect against privacy violations. Some cable communications companies have a code of privacy. Warner -Amex, for example. has a code of privacy by which it attempts to operate. Likewise. the New York State Cable Television Association has volun- tarily adopted and agreed to follow a code of privacy in order to protect the interests of the subscribers. Next. the franchise ordinance or franchise agreement should contain specific privacy provi- sions. These provisions should: (a) require sub- scriber authorization before the company may monitor household viewing, except for billing purposes and protecting system integrity; (b) prohibit the company from collecting or using personal information about a subscriber without that subscriber's written authorization, again except for billing purposes and monitoring pur- poses: (c) Limit the information that may be col- lected and maintained to only that information necessary to provide the services requested by the subscriber: (d) prohibit the disclosure of such information without prior authorization by the subscriber: (e) offer the subscriber the right of access to review the information.maintained on that subscriber: (f) require that where a subscriber contests the accuracy of that information, the company promptly reinvestigate and correct any disputed information: (g) require that any sub- scriber authorization be contained in a separate document with a prominent statement of consent: (h) limit any authorization to a period of not more than one year, revocable at any time by the subscriber without a penalty. Beyond these two steps. the need for privacy legislation at the state level should be considered. Minnesota, Illinois, and Wisconsin, for example. already have privacy legislatio n. Sim ilar legislation is pending in New York and California. While legislation at the state level may offer some protec- tion, municipalities should always be open to means of affording even greater privacy protec- tions. NATIONAL BRIEFS ► The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) voted in July to repeal a long - standing restriction on commercial broadcast networks owning cable systems. The FCC, on a unanimous vote, proposed to adopt a new rule permitting CBS. NBC, and ABC to own cable systems without any restrictions. Action on the pro- posed rule is not expected for some time. I. The FCC has ended a ten -year -old inquiry into ownership concentration in the cable communications industry. The commission concluded that the industry is not concentrated at this time. I. The United States Supreme Court ruled in July that a landlord Hurst be provided -just compensation" if the landlord is required to permit a cable company to install cable equipment on the property. At issue in Loretto e. Teleprompter Corp. of Manhat(un was a New York law which guaranteed cable companies reasonable access to multiple - dwelling units in return for one dollar. The New York landlord. Jean Loretto. argued that the company could not take her property without paying a fair fee. While the court upheld the state's power to mandate the installation of cable equipment. Justice Thurgood Marshall said he New York statute constituted a taking of property for which the landlord is duel ust compensation. The case has been remanded to the Lower courts for a deter- mination of what constitutes just compensation. to Senator Arlen Spector. R -Pa.. is sponsoring S. 1938, 97th Cong.. 1st Scss. (1982), which would remove any ceiling on franchise lees. Acompanion hill has yet to he introduced in the House. ► The New York State Cable Association and two of its members have filed suit against the New York State Commission on Cable Television seeking to overturn the commission's recently adopted mandatory access rules. The complaint alleges. among other things. that the rules violate the first amendment rights of the cable operators. constitutes a taking of private property without just compensation, and violates the suprem- acy clause of the United States Constitution because cable operators are compelled to become conunon carriers. ► Catalina Cablevision has filed suit charging the city of Tucson, Arizona, with violating federal antitrust laws after the city denied a second franchise bid from Catalina. Tucson awarded a cable franchise to Cox Cable Communications in December. 1981. Catalina. which operates a system just outside of Tucson, was one of ten companies competing for the initial fran- chise. The suit represents the first filed against a home -rule city since the United States Supreme Court's Boulder decision that home -rule status does not grant cities antitrust immunity without specific authority and active supervision from the state gov- ernment. Under Arizona law, cities can franchise or license cable systems under the authority of state/law. The law. however. is quiet about limiting competition. Catalina Cablevision is owned in part by TCID of Arizona, Inc., which is a wholly owned subsidiary of TeleCommunications, Inc. (TCI). TCI also owns the company which sued the city of Boulder. i n u a til*TEELITTig SEP 21 r,g, CITY OF LITTLE CANADA d 12-4_ 421e-22, 4 cil ( 0-4ject 7'6 caul: cid i 2-E. 4-9( il-0-A7 0 r c,L\ .. ciao ri ' _ . ( zee VIA4PAI J r I'LL ci r ni, 6J (LLtLa.- 77 7 C ,.ce L_ 0 7 A C,U—e-A-Os2_ s-,. t GRADING EXCAVATING H. A. GARSKE InterCity Pickup and Delivery Service Contract, General and Furniture Hauling 623 La Bore Road Saint Paul, Minn. 55117 Phone: 484 2855 ecz CYCG c<ob .5-57i 7 2 cL2 LC&7( GGtz� P er c_ CZ. C L y Vii.9. e fy - Butts and Sandberg 4. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 167 SOUTH LAKE STREET FOREST LAKE. MINNESOTA 35025 TELEPHONE 8$2/.S646!62 STEVE L. BUTTS DAVID C. SANDBERG SHARON K. SILL September 14, 1982 Mr. Joseph Chlebeck, Clerk City of Little Canada 515 Little Canada Road Little Canada, Minn. 55117 Re: My Client: Floyd J. Holzschuh /Holzschuh Addition I am writing to you concerning the problems my client has had with platting the above — described property located in Little Canada. My letter to you is based upon information gleaned from talking to the Ramsey County Recorder, the Ramsey County Department of Taxation, and your City Attorney, Mr. Thomas Sweeney. As I understand it, the Plat of Holzschuh Addition was finally approved in the fall of 1981 by your City Council. According to your Ordinance 1004.030(E), the plat should have been recorded within one hundred days after final approval or the approval itself is void. As I understand it, the plat is 'not yet recorded. My client finds himself unable to record the plat, and has been unable to do so since it was finally approved, due to the existence of delinquent taxes due and payable for the year 1981. In the years prior to 1981, the tax bill was quite low, on the order of $250.00 or so. In 1981, assessments for improvements to Payne Avenue, including sewer, water, pavement, curb and gutter and storm sewer were certified to the Ramsey County tax rolls, bringing .[le total due on the 1981 tax statement up to approximately $16,600.00. The County Recorder in Ramsey County will not accept the plat Eor recording until the delinquent taxes due and payable in 1981 including the assessments certified thereon, are paid in full. The recorder has indicated that he must receive a certificate of payment on all delinquent taxes from the Ramsey County Department of Taxation before he will record the plat. In speaking with the Department of Property Taxation, they indicate that the full amount of taxes and assessments must be paid for 1981 before such a certificate of payment can issue. The Department of Property Taxation has also indicated, however, that if your city, by resolution, would agree to take the assessment portion off of the 1981 tax statement and apply it to the 1982 and /or later tax statements, then and in that event, a certificate of payment of delinquent taxes could be issued upon payment of the general taxes alone, a figure somehwat on the order of $250.00. My client has sold and unsold several lots in the plat on several occasions, and has not been able to close these transactions because the plat is not recorded. My client cannot record the plat until he has sufficient money to pay the taxes • Mr. Joseph Chlebeck September 14, 1982 and assessments; he cannot obtain this money until the lots are sold. At this point in time, as you can see, he is stuck in the middle of a financial dilemma. I would appreciate it if you would review the foregoing, and either write or call with answers to the following questions: 1. Is the City Council of Little Canada willing to reapprove on a final basis, the Plat of Holzschuh Addition as it was originally approved last fall? 2. What was the date of final approval in fall of 1981? 3. When were the improvements to Payne Avenue (including all those for which assessments have been levied) completed? 4. When did the interest begin to accrue on the unpaid levy assessment and at what rate and in what amounts? 5. In order to ease my clients' financial dilemma for the present, and in order to make the land saleable and allow the recording of the plat, will the City Council allow, by resolution, the assessments due and payable in 1981 to be passed over to the 1982 or later bax bills? My client has spent considerable time and money in attempting to plat and sell this property. If he cannot record the plat, he cannot sell the lots, and if he cannot sell them, his only alternative will be to let the property go back to the county and /or the state for nonpayment of taxes. That would mean a loss of revenue for him, for the city, and eventually for the county and state. I would appreciate a response to my questions noted above as soon as possible; if you are able to arrange for payment of the delinquent general taxes (without payment of the assessments) for the year 1981, we must do so before the end of this year. On and after January, 1983, the taxes due and payable in 1982 will then also be deemed to be delinquent. Sincerely, Steve Butts SB /bb cc: Mr. & Mrs. Floyd J. Holzschuh .OU McKENNA Director OGER VIK Assistant Director DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION COUNTY OF RAMSEY 126 -138 Court House St. Paul, Minnesota 55102 September 29, 1982 Joseph G. Chlebeck City of Little Canada 515 E. Little Canada Rd. St. Paul, Minnesota, 55117 Abatement #97912 53- 81500 - 180 -03 Dear Mr. Chlebeck: DIVISION MANAGERS: Robert J. Ellis Property Valuation William M. Killeen Revenue C. Thomas Osiholf Land Records As per our conversation 9/17/82, I am en- closing copies of previous correspondence requesting a resolution to cancel the assessments on above coded property. If you have any questions, or need more informa- tion, you may ca]l me at 298- 4157. Very truly yours, Lou McKenna, Director Department of Property T'axst, ton Donald A. Russell Assistant Supervisor, Appraisal Services 35 WINDROW e° DRIVC :., ..0 ..° Q.... 3 a ..23- 2221 ; 19 lit i a.a!`iae� 4, 741 8 ? 9 10 // (2 d 13 '� /R 1,5 ORIVZb • �, 0 1 Q+ 9 " I07,-; I I � 'a 13 19 /s ofn ill na lu 1. u Farm OPT 129 APPLICATION FOR RELIEF— General Form B (If reduction requested exceeds S500 make application In triplicate. otherwise In duplicate) To the County Rand and County Auditor of Ramsey County, and to the Commissioner of Revenue of the state or Minnesota: STATE OF MINNESOTA, County of Ramsey City, Village or Town Little Canada Applicant: rd.^ Resides ac Clayton Parke :Atty..%t Law 53- 81500- 180 -03 The City of Little Canada and that The above coded property was dedicated to the City of Little Canada to be used for Parka and Playgrounds Aug. 17, 1978. This dedication was approved and accepted by the Council of the City of Little Cag de and was included in the new plat '%kstwinde ". Due to an error the enclosed Quit Claim Deed was not presented to the Auditors office and subse.uentt• this : areal remained taxable. According to N.S.A. Laws 272.68 "properties acquired prior to Oct. 16, 1978 by Covermentoi Subdivisions and used for public purposes are immune from taxation for 1979 and thereafter. Applicant requests: Taxes and Aesoeesr_nta for the years payable 1979, 1980 and 1981 be fully abated and this parcel placed in the exempt category. Applicant C� /. DATE iP 7 A D 19 ee DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION COUNTY OF RAMSEY /VC-r- u�' J' 26 -138 Court House Sc10 C�,Lin,,_e St. Paul, Minnesota 55102 2 � LOU McKENNA t 04---(- n766-44.4,3 Director ROGER VIK Assistant Director June 12, 1980 t%(lrie0)1 Sn+ 144:4 Joseph G. Chlebeck, Clerk City of Little Canada 515 E. Little Canada Rd. St. Paul, Minnesota 55117 Dear Mr. Chlebeck: DIVISION MANAGERS: Robert J. Ellis Property Valuation William M. Killeen Revenue C. Thomas 0stho(f Land Records Re: Abatement No. 97912 Code No. 53- 81500 - 180 -03 The referenced abatement is being submitted to cancel the taxes on the property involved. There is an assessment levied against this parcel that is to be cancelled by resolution of the City Council, as follows: Assessment Year Wtr. Main 77 -1 thru 6 .`1S14 1978 $274.64 1979 220.94 Please initiate the necessary action. RKP:ay Enc. Yours very truly, Lou McKenna, Director Department —b Property Taxatio By Supv. Appraisal Services .01) ,McKENNA Director ,OGER VIK Assistant Director DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION COUNTY OF RAMSEY 126.133 Court Hnusc St. Paul, Minnesota 55107 December 14, 1931 Mr. Clayton Parks Jr 1590 White Bear Avenue St. Paul, Minnesota 55106 Dear Mr. Parks: Here is the copy of the Abatement that was sent to Mr. Joseph Chlebeck:, Clerk of Little Canada. Have you worked anything out on this yet? Thank you. Yours very truly, Lou McKenna, Director DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION Asst Supvr of Appraisal Services DAR: em ENC: -1 3`1 DIVISION MANAGERS: Robe., J. 1PIas Prop, :rty Volvo ion ',hI i.l • .... rne,I,. ,..ho!t Rccora:: r '011 ! -.0 ■ ■ ■ _ • • • • , • • a ' . .. • Z ' - ILI i 0 Di 0 - 0 M . . . . . CO T-1 •0 4 0 0 1.-.1 . . . u) •; Z q , .. • Di ± z ? . • r .. • . w cz Fz i . 1/1 U In W L 1. 0 L. N • cc 0 a I II AMOUNT OF JUDGEMENT tc■ — if toZ 0 II: a a L) a 44) I t.. ! ..- 1 --;- I 1 ; ! U, V ---fr-__-... T ---t- --1-- , .. -T +-- . ca — 1 -,4....,,,,-,-4.----_..... , 0 i 1 ■ I - 4 ---I-- _ .... _ 1 --.----= ----- m en L 1. 0 L. N • cc Roseville Area Schools Arden Hills, Falcon Heights, Lauderdale, Little Canada, Maplewood, Roseville, Shoreview PAUL A. BORG Assistant Superintendent Business Services District 623 September 10, 1982 CITY OF LITTLE CANADA Little Canada Park Commission Carl Spooner, Chairman 515 Little Canada Road Little Canada, MN 55117 Carl: SCHOOL BOARD Walter Parsons, Jr., Chairman David E. Monson, Clerk Donald E. Bauman, Treasurer Joanne Cushman, Director John Duncan, Director Gary Tritle, Director DR. LLOYD C. NIELSEN Superintendent Your request on behalf of the Little Canada Park Commission to blacktop the lower parking lot was approved by the School Board on Thursday, September 9, 1982. You may proceed with this project as soon as you wish. The School District does request that "speed bumps" be placed as an integral part of the driveway at both the top and lower portion. This is consistent with those that currently exist on the gravel drive. Finally, and only as a reminder, should the School District have need of the property for school purposes, this improvement could be lost to that development. At thin time, that would not appear to be a concern, but the future does have some uncertainties. Sincerely yours, �. Paul A. gorge —� Assistant Superintendent Business Services PAB:jme pc: Dr. Nielsen 1251 WEST COUNTY ROAD B -2 / ROSEVILLE, MINNESOTA 55113 -3299 / TELEPHONE: 612-633-8150 SPECIAL REPORT -A- SHERIFF'S CONTRACT July 19, 1982 CHARLES L. ZACHARIAS COUNTY of RAMSEY Thomas J. Falvey, Chief Deputy 14 W. KELLOGG BLVD. • ST. PAUL, MINN. 55102 Joseph G. Chlebeck City of Little Canada 515 East Little Canada Road St. Paul, Minnesota 55117 Rear Mr. Chlebeck: Enclosed find two (2) copies of the 1983 Agreement for Law Enforcement Services and a copy of the 1983 Budget Estimate. A couple of changes in the estimated budget should be noted. They are: A 10% salary increase for 1983; 1.25% of the payroll has been budgeted for overtime payment for Sergeant's and Deputy Sheriff's (this per Union Contract - Article 12.7) and one (1) additional Radio Dispatcher. It has been budgeted in the Radio Service Charge (page 12) to provide for additional workload caused by the 911. After review and City Council approval, please return both signed copies of the agreement to this department. They will then be presented to the Ramsey County Board of Commissioners for approval. One copy will be returned to you. If you have any questions concerning this agreement and /or estimated budget, contact Division Commander Fred Spencer at 481 -1306. Sincerely, CHARLES L CHARIAS Sheriff, Ra. ey County /d cc: Division Commander Spencer ADMINISTRATIVE • COURTS DIVISION 298-4451 ADULT DETENTION DIVISION 292 -6050 PATROL DIVISION 484-3366 AGREEMENT LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of , 19, by and between the COUNTY OF RAMSEY, hereinafter referred to as the "County" and the CITY OF LIfl1R CANADA , hereinafter referred to as the "Municipality ". WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the parties to this Agreement are desirous of con- tracting for the performance by the County of the hereinafter described . law enforcement functions for, and within the boundaries of, the Munici-i pality through the Ramsey County Sheriff; and WHEREAS, the County of Ramsey is agreeable to rendering such services on the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth; and WHEREAS, such contracts are authorized and provided for by the provisions of Minnesota Statutes 1957, Sec. 471.59, and Laws 1959, Chapter 372. NOW, THEREFOR, pursuant to the terms of the aforesaid statutes, it is agreed as follows: 1. The County agrees, through the Sheriff of the County of Ramsey, to provide patrol and police protection within the corporate limits of Municipality to the extent and in the matter hereinafter set forth. Except as otherwise hereinafter specifically set forth, such services shall only encompass duties and functions of the type coming within the jurisdiction of and customarily rendered by the Sheriff of the County of Ramsey under the statutes. -1- The rendition of such service, the standards of performance, the discipline of officers, and other matters incident to the performance of such services and the control of personnel so employed, shall remain in the County. In event of dispute between the parties as to the extent of the duties and functions to be rendered hereunder, or the level or manner of performance of such service, the determination thereof made by the Sheriff of the County shall be final and conclusive as between the parties hereto, provided however, that upon notice by the Municipality, the parties shall negotiate their differences in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 10 hereof. Services performed hereunder shall include but not be limited to traffic law enforcement including the regular use of radar as a speed deterrent, non - traffic ordinance law enforcement, license inspection and enforcement, and the regular patrol of business and residential areas with the Municipality. 2. To facilitate the performance of said functions, it is hereby agreed that the County shall have full cooperation and assistance from the Municipality, its officers, agents and employees. 3. For the purpose of performing said functions, County shall furnish and supply all necessary labor, supervision, equipment, communication facilities and dispatching, and supplies necessary to maintain the level of service to be rendered hereunder. 4. All Deputy Sheriffs, clerks, dispatchers and all other personnel performing duties pursuant to this agreement shall at all times be considered employees of the County for all purposes. -2- Except as otherwise provided, the 'tunicipality shall not be called upon to assume any liability for the direct nayment of any salaries, wares, or other compensation to any County personnel performing services hereunder for said '.'unicipality, and the County hereby assumes said liabilities. Except as herein otherwise specified, the "unicipality shall not be liable for compensation or indemnity to any County employee for injury or sickness arising out of his employment, and the County hereby agrees to hold harmless the '?unicipality against any such claim. 5. The ''unicipality, its officers and employees, shall not be deemed to assume any liability for the intentional or negligent acts of the County or the County's employees performing services pursuant to this MFreement, and the County shall hold the ''unicinality, its officers and employees harmless from and shall defend the "unicipality, its officers and employees, against any claim for damages arising from the performance of this Agreement. 6. This Agreement shall commence January 1, 19 Ri , and shall be in effect for one year. Either party may terminate this Agreement upon ninety (90) days written notice to the other Harty. 7. The `:unicioality agrees to pay the County the actual cost of performing all services covered by this agreement. Costs shall include salaries of employees engaged in performing said services, including a pro rata of vacation and sick leave, mileage, uniforms, public employees retirement contributions, worker's compensation insurance premiurs, general overhead, including indirect expenses and supplies, radio unit expense, health and welfare expense, and police professional liability insurance upon which, in addition to the County, the municipality shall be a named insured. Costs as used herein shall not include items of expense attributable to services or facilities normally provided or available to all cities within the County as -3.- part of the County's obligation to enforce State law. Actual computation of applicable costs hereunder shall be made by the 2amsey County Budget and Accounting office based on information provided by the Sheriff and payment therefor shall be made by the municipality on the County's monthly statement. An estimate of said costs for 1983 , and for succeeding years in the event this agreement is extended, shall be furnished by the County to the municipality no less than one month prior to the commencement of the contract tern. Said estimate shall be made for the limited purpose of better enabling the municipality to estimate its budget. It is understood by the parties to this agreement that said estimates shall in no way prevent the County from charging its actual costs. 8. It is understood that prosecutions for violations of ordinance or state statute, together with disposition of all fines collected pursuant thereto, shall be in accordance with the Ramsey County Municipal Court Act, Minnesota Statute, Chapter 488A. 9. The Ramsey County Sheriff's office shall submit to the municipality monthly activity reports detailing the activities of the Sheriff's office within the City. Said reports shall contain at least the following information: "files patrolled, hours patrolled, number of calls answered, number of tickets issued. -4- 10. It is understood between the Parties hereto that upon notice >iven by either Party, negotiations will be undertaken for the purpose of revising, adding or striking any of the provisions of this contract which it appears are in dispute, are unworkable, or are insufficient as herein set forth; and that such changes, if any, when agreed to, will be entered by supplemental contract,which shall have the some effect as though it had been originally a provision of this Agreement. 11. It is further understood that this Agreement shall take effect anon being approved and executed by both parties hereto. The County agrees to notify the ?'unicipality forthwith upon said approval by the Board of Commissioners. 12. This Agreement shall be effective as of January 1, 1983 . -5- IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of LICE CANADA , by resolution duly adopted by its Governing Body, has caused this Agreement to be signed by its Mayor and Manager and the seal of the Municipality to be affixed hereto on the day of 19 ,' the County of Ramsey by resolution of its Board of County Commissioners, has caused these presents to be subscribed by the Chairman and Executive Secretary of said Board and the seal of said Board to be affixed thereto and attested by the said Board on the day of , 19_ CITY OF By: By: ATTEST: By: By: T TTRT F CANAnA Mayor Manager County of Ramsey Chairman, Board of County Commissioners -6- Executive Secretary AGREEMENT LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of , 19, by and between the COUNTY OF RAMSEY, hereinafter referred to as the "County" and the CITY OF LITTLE CANADA , hereinafter referred to as the "Municipality ". WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the parties to this Agreement are desirous of con- tracting for the performance by the County of the hereinafter described law enforcement functions for, and within the boundaries of, the Munici- pality through the Ramsey County Sheriff; and WHEREAS, the County of Ramsey is agreeable to rendering such services on the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth; and WHEREAS, such contracts are authorized and provided for by the provisions of Minnesota Statutes 1957, Sec. 471.59, and Laws 1959, Chapter 372. NOW, THEREFOR, pursuant to the terms of the aforesaid statutes, it is agreed as follows:, 1. The County agrees, through the Sheriff of the County of Ramsey, to provide patrol and police protection within the corporate limits of Municipality to the extent and in the matter hereinafter set forth. Except as otherwise hereinafter specifically set forth, such services shall only encompass duties and functions of the type coming within the jurisdiction of and customarily rendered by the Sheriff of the County of Ramsey under the statutes. -1- The rendition of such service, the standards of performance, the discipline of officers, and other matters incident to the performance of such services and the control of personnel so employed, shall remain in the County. In event of dispute between the parties as to the extent of the duties and functions to be rendered hereunder, or the level or manner of performance of such service, the determination thereof made by the Sheriff of the County shall be final and conclusive as between the parties hereto, provided however, that upon notice by the Municipality, the parties shall negotiate their differences in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 10 hereof. Services performed hereunder shall include but not be limited to traffic law enforcement including the regular use of radar as a speed deterrent, non - traffic ordinance law enforcement, license inspection and enforcement, and the regular patrol of business and residential areas with the Municipality. 2. To facilitate the performance of said functions, it is hereby agreed that the County shall have full cooperation and assistance from the Municipality, its officers, agents and employees. 3. For the purpose of performing said functions, County shall furnish and supply all necessary labor, supervision, equipment, communication facilities and dispatching, and supplies necessary to maintain the level of service to be rendered hereunder. 4. All Deputy Sheriffs, clerks, dispatchers and all other personnel performing duties pursuant to this agreement shall at all times be considered employees of the County for all purposes. -2- Except as otherwise provided, the ' <unicipality shall not be called upon to assume any liability for the direct payment of any salaries, wares, or other compensation to any County personnel performing services hereunder for said "unicipality, and the County hereby assumes said liabilities. Except as herein otherwise specified, the ''unicipality shall not be liable for compensation or indemnity to any County employee for injury or sickness arising out of his employment, and the County hereby agrees to hold harmless the '9unicipality against any such claim. 5. The "unicinality, its officers.and employees, shall not be deemed to assume any liability for the intentional or negligent acts of the County or the County's employees performing services pursuant to this Agreement, and the County shall hold the `"unicinality, its officers and employees harmless from and shall defend the "unicinality, its officers and employees, against any claim for damages arising from the performance of this Agreement. 6. This Agreement shall commence January 1, 1983 , and shall be in effect for one year. Either party may terminate this Agreement upon ninety (90) days written notice to the other party. 7. The ".unicipality agrees to pay the County the actual cost of performing all services covered by this agreement. Costs shall include salaries of employees engaged in performing said services, including a nro rata of vacation and sick leave, mileage, uniforms, public employees retirement contributions, worker's compensation insurance premiums, general overhead, including indirect expenses and supnlies, radio unit expense, health and welfare expense, and police professional liability insurance upon which, in addition to the County, the municipality shall be a named insured. Costs as used herein shall not include items of expense attributable to services or facilities normally provided "or available to all cities within the County as -3- Hart of the County's obligation to enforce State law. Actual computation of applicable costs hereunder shall be made by the Ramsey County Budget and Accounting office based on information provided by the Sheriff and payment therefor shall be made by the municirality on the County's monthly statement. An estimate of said costs for 1983, and for succeeding years in the event this agreement is extended, shall be furnished by the County to the municipality no less than one month prior to the commencement of the contract term. Said estimate shall be made for the limited purpose of better enabling the municipality to estimate its budget. It is understood by the parties to this agreement that said estimates shall in no way prevent the County from charging its actual costs. 8. It is understood that prosecutions for violations of ordinance or state statute, together with disposition of all fines collected pursuant thereto, shall be in accordance with the Ramsey County Yunicipal Court Act, Minnesota Statute, Chapter 488.. 9. The '.a_+nsey County Sheriff's office shall submit to the municipality monthly activity reports detailing the activities of the Sheriff's office within the City. Said reports shall contain at least the following information: ".files patrolled, hours patrolled, number of calls answered, number of tickets issued. 10. It is understood between the Parties hereto that upon notice given by either Party, negotiations Kill be undertaken for the purpose of revising, adding or striking any of the provisions of this contract which it appears are in dispute, are unworkable, or are insufficient as herein set forth; and that such changes, if any, when agreed to, will be entered by supnlemental contract,which shall have the same effect as though it Had been originally a provision of this Agreement. 11. It is further understood that this Agreement shall take effect upon being approved and executed by both parties hereto. The County agrees to notify the Municipality forthwith upon said approval by the. Board of Commissioners. 12. This Agreement shall be effective as of January 1, 1983 . -5- IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of LITTLE CANADA , by resolution duly adopted by its Governing Body, has caused this Agreement to be signed by its Mayor and Manager and the seal of the Municipality to be affixed hereto on the day of 19 , the County of Ramsey by resolution of its Board of County Commissioners, has caused these presents to be subscribed by the Chairman and Executive Secretary of said Board and the seal of said Board to be affixed thereto and attested by the said Board on the day of , 19 CITY OF By: By: ATTEST: By: By: TXTTT,F CANADA Mayor Manager County of Ramsey Chairman, Board of County Commissioners -6- Executive Secretary DIVISION: Patrol/Investigation UNIT: Qmtmct Patrol MIISSICN: Tb provide law enforcement service to the municipalities of Arden Hills, Falcon Heights, Gen Lake, Little Canada, North Oaks, Shoreview, and Vadnais Heights. OBJECTIVE: Tb reduce the opportunity for committing crimes, apprehend offenders, promote traffic safety, maintain peace and provide for the safety of citizens in the municipalities. FUNCTION: Provide patrol coverage 24 hrs /day, 7 days/week, responding to calls for assistance, enforcing traffic laws and regula- tions, investigating crimes, enforcing Federal and State Laws, County regulations and City ordinances in the seven (7) Law Enforcement Contract Cities. PERSONNEL COMPLEMENT: 2 - Sergeants 31 - Deputy Sheriffs 2 - Clerk - Typist III TOTAL C MPLEME T: 35 Budget Estimates for 1983 Law Enforcement Contract Services Total Estimated Budget for seven Contract Cities (total does not include the Sergeant cost (by index) for Arden Hills, the Radio Service costs for Arden Hills and Falcon Heights, or the "Direct Charge" to North Oaks. These costs are picked up and shown below): $1,358,679 Sergeant's costs for six (6) cities: 89,436 "Direct Charge" for additional service No. Oaks: 60,415 Radio Service Charges for 7 Cities: 49,624 Cost Breakdown by City $1,558,154 Arden Hills (includes Radio Service & Sergeants -Index 1.7.78% charges): $278,505 Falcon Heights (includes Radio Service Charge): $254,872 5- Contract Cities Gem Lake - Deputy Index - 2.50 %: Sergeant Index - 2.08 %: Radio Charge: 1. Little Canada - Deputy Index - 21.19%: Sgt. Index - 17.11 %: Radio Charge: North Oaks - Deputy Index - 14.83 %: Sgt. Index - 12.33 %: Direct Charge: Radio Charge: Shoreview - Deputy Index - 41.86 %: Sgt. Index - 34.30%; Radio Charge: $ 278,505 $ 254,872 $ 21,387 1,860 431 $ 23,678 $181,273 15,481 7,537 $ 204,291 $126,865 11,027 60,415 3,027 $ 201,334 $358,098 30,677 18,363 $ 407,138 Vadnais Heights - Deputy Index - 19.62%: $167,842 Sgt. Index - 16.18 %: 14,471 Radio Charge: 6,023 $ 188,336 $1,558,154 n - 1983 - Cost Breakdown Estimate - 5 Contract Cities - Salaries: 18 3/4 Deputies (incl night diff) at $25,615 Deputy: $480,281 Salary Increase for 1983 - Est. at 10%: 48,028 Overtime Pay -1.25% of Salaries: 6,604 PERA: 12% of Salaries: 64,190 Mileage: 35t /mile at approximately 227,000 mi /yr: 79,450 Workmen's Compensation- Approx. $1200 /man /yr: 22,500 Police Liability Insurance - Approx. $125 /man /yr: 2,344 Health & Welfare - Approx. $123 /man /mo: 27,675 Uniform Allowance - $225 /man /yr: 4,219 Overhead Charge - $4819.69 /man /yr: 90,370 Pro -rated Share of Clerk - Typist III's: 29,804 TOTAL ESTIMATE: $855,465 Pro -rated Based on Deputy Sheriff Budget Index (See Page 3) Cities Combined Index Estimated Cost Gem Lake 2.50 $ 21,387 Little Canada 21.19 181,273 North Oaks 14.83 126,865 Shoreview 41,86 358,098 Vadnais Heights 19.62 167,842 100.00% $855,465 -2- 7/15/82 1983 Deputy Sheriff Budget Index - 5 Contract Cities - The following index is the adjusted index for determining the Law Enforcement Contract Service Cost. Figures are based on the April 1, 1981 population figure as provided by the Metro- politan Council. AREA CITIES ACRES INDEX 33.33% Gem Lake 723 Little Canada 2843 North Oaks 5485 Shoreview 8060 Vadnais Heights 5192 CITIES 3.24 12.75 24.59 36,14 23.28 1.08 4.25 8.20 12.04 7.76 TOTAL: 22,303 100.00 33.33% POPULATION POPULATION INDEX 33.33% Gem Lake Little Canada North Oaks Shoreview Vadnais Heights 410 7170 2880 17470 5730 1.22 21.30 8.56 51.90 17.02 .41 7.10 2.85 17.30 5.67 TOTAL: 33,660 100.00 33.33% EVENTS INVESTIGATED (1981) CITIES EVENTS INV. INDEX 33.34% Gem Lake Little Canada North Oaks Shoreview Vadnais Heights 377 3653 1404 4652 2299 3.04 29.50 11.34 37.56 18.56 1.01 9.84 3.78 12.52 6.19 TOTAL: 12,385 100.00 33.34% COMBINED INDEX CITIES 100.00% Gem Lake Little Canada North Oaks Shoreview Vadnais Heights 2.50 21.19 14.83 41.86 19.62 TOTAL: 100.00% -2- ■ - 1983 - Cost Breakdown Estimate for Sergeants - 5 Contract Cities & Arden Hills - 2 - Sergeants (incl night diff) at approximately $28,285/man: $56,570 Salary Increase for 1983 - Estimate at 10 %: 5,657 Overtime Pay - 1.25% of Salaries: 778 PERA: 12% of Salaries: 7,561 Workmen's Compensation - Approximately $1200 /man /yr: 2,400 Police Liability Insurance - Approximately $125 /man /yr: 250 Health & Welfare - Approximately $123 /man /mo: 2,952 Uniform Allowance - $225 /man /yr: 450 Overhead Charge: $4819.69 /man /yr: 9,639 Pro -rated Share of Clerk- Typist III's: 3,179 TOTAL ESTIMATE: $89,436 Pro -rated Based on Sergeant Budget Index (See Page 5) Cities Combined Index Estimated Cost Arden Hills 17.80 $15,920 Gem Lake 2.08 1,860 Little Canada 17.31 15,481 North Oaks 12.33 11,027 Shoreview 34.30 30,677 Vadnais Heights 16.18 14,471 100.00% $89,436 -4 - 1983 Sergeant Budget Index - 5 Contract Cities & Arden Hills - The following indeic is the adjusted index for determining the Law Enforcement Contract Service Cost. Figures are based on the April 1, 1981 population figure as provided by the Metropolitan Council. AREA CITIES ACRES INDEX 33.33% Arden Hills (ex- 3,944 15.03 5.01 cluding Arsenal) Gan Lake ' 723 2.75 .92 Little Canada 2,843 10.83 3.61 North Oaks 5,485 20.90 6.97 Shoreview 8,060 30.71 10.23 Vadnais Heights 5,192 • 19.78 6.59 TOTAL: 26,247 100.00 33.33% POPULATION CITIES POPULATION INDEX 33.33% Arden Hills 8,280 19.74 6.58 Gen Lake 410 .98 .33 Little Canada 7,170 17.10 5.70 North Oaks 2,880 6.87 2.29 Shoreview 17,470 41.65 13.88 Vadnais Heights 5,730 13.66 4.55 TOTAL: 41,940 100.00 33.33% EVENTS INVESTIGATED (1981) CITIES EVENTS INVESTIGATED INDEX 33.34% Arden Hills 2,834 18.62 6.21 Gen Lake 377 2.48 .83 Little Canada 3,653._ 24.00 8.00 North Oaks 1,404 9.22 3.07 Shoreview 4,652 30.57 10.19 Vadnais Heights 2,299 15.11 5.04 A RAL: 15,219 100.00 33.34% COMBINED INDEX CITIES 100.00% Arden Hills 17.80 Gen Lake 2.08 Little Canada 17.31 North Oaks 12.33 Shoreview 34.30 Vadnais Heights 16.18 TOTAL: 100.00% NORTH OAKS - Direct Charge Salaries - 1; Deputies (Incl Night Diff) approx. $25,615 /man: $32,019 Salary Increase for 1983 - Estimate 10 %: 3,202 Overtime Pay - 1.25% of Salaries: 440 PERA: 12% of Salaries: 4,279 Mileage: 35 /mile at approximately 24,800 /mile /yr: 8,680 Workmen's Compensation - approximately $1200 /man /yr: 1,500 Police Liability Insurance - approximately $125 /man /yr: 156 Health & Welfare - approximately $123 /man /month: 1,845 Uniform Allowance - $225 /man /yr: 282 Overhead Charge: $4819.69 /man /yr: 6,025 • Pro -rated Share of Clerk- Typist III's: 1,987 TOTAL DIRECT CHARGE TO NORTH OAKS: $60,415 -6- 7/15/82 1983 ESTIMATED CJVERHEAD CHARGE 1. Supervisory Support A. Share of Division Commander's Salary: $38,555 x 10% (1983 salary increase = $42,411 x 41.667% 17.18% Fringe Benefit: B. Share of Deputy Commander's salary: $35,381 x 10% (1983 salary increase) = $38,919 x 41.667' 17.18% Fringe Benefit: C. Share of Lieutenant's salary: $33,587.x 10% (1983 salary increase) = '$36,946 x 41.667% 17.18% Fringe Benefit: $ 42,411 $17,671 3,036 $20,707 $ 38,919 $16,216 2,786 $19,002 $ 36,946 $15,394 2,645 $18,039 D. Share of four (4) Sergeant's salaries. $118,924 x 10% (1983 salary increase) = $130,816 X 1.25% (Overtime Pay) = $132,451 x 41.667% $55,188 17.18% Fringe Benefit: 9,481 $64,669 NOTE: Overhead expense in the Patrol Division is hosed on 84 employees, of which 35 or 41.667% of the total cork directly for the seven (7) Contract Cities. *TOTAL SUPERVISORY SUPPORT $122,417 2. Training Support A. Share of training Sergeant's salary $27,605 x 10% (1983 salary increase) = $ 30,366 X 1.25% (Overtime Pay) = $30,746 x 13.566% $ 4,171 17.18% Fringe Benefit: 717 $ 4,888 B. Share of training Deputy's salary $25,637 x 10% (1983 salary increase) = $ 28,201 X 1.25% (Overtime Pay) = $28,554 x 13.566% $ 3,874 17.18% Fringe Benefit: 666 $ 4,540 NOTE: Training's overhead expense based on 258 total departmental employees, of which 35 or 13.566% cork for the seven (7) Contract Cities. *TOTAL TRAINING SUPPORT $ 9,428 -7- 1983 Estimated Overhead Charge, Continued . . . 3. Materials & Supplies A. Patrol Division 1) Printing & Stationery: 2) Office Supplies: 3) Identification Supplies: 4) First Aid Supplies: $ 3,500 1,700 2,700 1,250 $ 9,150 $9,150 x 41.667% (35 of 84 patrol employees) $3,813 B. Mministration Division 1) Employee Development: 2) Conference & Seminars: 3) Law Enforcement Supplies: 4) Firearm Supplies: $ 1,500 27,515 4,650 12,450 $46,115 $46,115 x 13.566% (35 of 258 total employees) $6,256 *TOTAL MATERIALS & SUPPLIES CHARGE $10,069 4. Administrative Processing Charge (see page 9) A. Sheriff (processing, requisitions, invoices, payroll, etc.) B. Budgets & Accounting (warrants, data processing costs, payroll costs, register invoices, process receipts, register invoices, journal entries, balance sheet, financial statements, etc.) C. Civil Service (payroll records updating, records, testing, etc ) D. Property Taxation (record & code receipts, validate receipts, journalize, recap and file, etc.) E. Other Expenses (City -cbunty Purchasing Dept. and State Auditor costs) *TOTAL ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING CHARGE $22,662 5. Services Support (see page 9) F. 17.18% Fringe Benefit for Sheriff's Administrative processing cost. NOTE: Item B thru E have the fringe included. G. Lost interest on $50,000 advance. *TOTAL SERVICE SUPPORT CHARGE . . . . $ 4,113 TOTAL ESTIMATED OVERHEAD CHARGE FOR 1983 $168,689 -8- COST ALLOCATION PLAN FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVIC'FS COUNTY DEPARTMENT ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING CHARGE SERVICE SUPPORT A. Sheriff $ 5,890 B. Budgets & Accounting 7,201 C. Civil Service 1,834 D. Property Taxation 361 E. Other Expenses 5,316 (Purchasing & State Auditor) F. 17.18% Fringe Benefit for $1012 Sheriff Total Basic Labor Cost: $20,602 $1012 1983 Estimated Salary Inc. 10% 2,060 101 1983 2U2'AL LABOR COST: $22,662 $1113 CIPHER COSTS G. Lost Interest on $50,000 3000 Advance GRAND TOTAL: A /1 /R' $22,662 $4113 OVERHEAD CHARGE BREAKDOWN Total Estimated Overhead Charge: $168,689 = 35 Employees - $4,819.69 /employee /year. Arden Hills: Falcon Heights: 5 Contract Cities: $4819.69 x 54 Deputies = $4,819.69 x 54 Deputies= $4,819.69 x 18 3/4 Deputies = North Oaks (Dir. Chg.): $4,819.69 x 1; Deputies = 2 Sergeants pro -rated to 6 cities: $4,819.69 x 2 = 2 Clerk- Typist III's pro -rated by number of city personnel: $4,819.69 = TOTAL ESTIMATED OVERHEAD CHARGE: -10- 7/15/82 $ 26,508 26,508 90,370 6,025 9,639 9,639 $168,689 BREAKDOWN • OF FRINGE BENEFITS 1981 Fringes - Law Enforcement Services Fund 1981 Salaries: $701,317 Fringes: Amount % of Salaries PERA + FICA $ 84,176 12.00% Insurance 36,348 5.18% TOTAL FRINGES: $120,524 17.18% 4/1/82 -11- n, I 1983 RADIO SERVICE CHARGE The Radio Service Charge is based on a personnel complement of 14, nine (9) are necessary for the radio communication with the Sheriff's Department vehicles only. The remaining five (5) radio personnel are necessary to provide for the Radio Users named below. Cost Breakdown Estimate - Total Operation Salaries: 1- Communications Supervisor $ 29,869 3- Dep.Sher. -Radio Dispatcher (Inc. 67,045 night differential) 1 -Radio Dispatcher II (Inc. Diff.) 20,087 9 -Radio Dispatcher I (Inc. Diff.) 149,195 TOTAL SALARIES: $266,196 Salary Increase - 10% Estimate for 1983: 26,620 PERA & PERA/FICA - 12% of Salaries: 35,138 Health & Welfare - Approx. $123 /mo /person: 20,664 Uniform Allowance - 3 Dep.Sher. -Radio Dispatchers x $225 /person/yr.: 675 Parts, Repairs & Supplies - Estimate: 5,000 Data Processing Charge.(Est. $150 /mo. for squad activity 1,800 system): TOTAL RADIO COST: $356,093 SHERIFF'S USE: 9/14 of $356,093 = $228,917 RADIO USERS: 5/14 of $356,093 = $127,176 $356,093 RADIO USERS Based on the total population for the seven (7) Contract Cities, Mounds View, New Brighton, and Roseville /Lauderdale - 120,990 t $127,176 = $1.0511 per capita. Seven (7) Contract Cities Arden Hills: 8,280 x $1.0511 = $ 8,703 Gan Lake: 410 x $1.0511 = 431 . Falcon Heights: 5,270 x $1.0511 = 5,540 Little Canada: 7,170 x $1.0511 = 7,537 North Oaks: 2,880 x $1.0511 = 3,027 Shoreview: 17,470 x $1.0511 = 18,363 Vadnais Heights: 5,730 x $1.0511 = 6,023 TOTAL CONTRACT CITTFS• Other Agencies Mounds View: New Brighton: Roseville /Lauderdale: TOTAL OTHER TOTAL RADIO Rev. $ 49,624 12,610 x $1.0511 = $13,255 23,350 x $1.0511 = 24,544 37,820 x $1.0511 = 39,753r AGENCIES: $ 77,552 COSTS FOR RADIO USERS: $127,176 Two (2) Clerk- Typist III's - Pro -rated by number of city personnel: Salary of two (2) Clerk- Typist III's (includes night diff. for one (1) Clerk) $30,410 Salary Increase - 10% Estimated for 1983: 3,041 PERA /FICA - 12% of Salary 4,014 Workmen's Compensation - Estimated at $1200 /person: 2,400 Health & Welfare - Approximately $123 /person /month: 2,952 Overhead Charge: $4819.69 /person: 9,639 TOTAL COST OF CLERK- TYPIST III: $52,456 $52,456 f 33 Sworn Personnel = $1,589.58 Pro -rated by Personnel in Each City Arden Hills: Falcon Heights: 5 Contract Cities: North Oaks (Dir. Chg.) 2 Sergeants: 7/15/82 $1;589.58 x 51 men $1,589.58 x 51 men = $1,589.58 x 18 3/4 men = $1,589.58 x 1; men $1,589.58 x 2 men $ 8,743 8,743 29,804 1,987 3,179 TOTAL COST FOR CLERK - TYPIST III: $52,456 -13- LAW ENFORCMENT SERVICE FOR THE CITY OF ARDEN HILLS 1983 BUDGET ESTIMATE 51 men - 3 shifts /day, 7 days /week Salaries - 51 deputies (inc. night diff.) approx. $25,615 /man: $140,883 Salary Increase - 10% Estimate for 1983 • 14,088 Overtime Pay - 1.25% of Salaries: 1,937 PERA: 12% of Salaries: 18,829 Mileage: 35fi /mile at approximately 75,000 /year 26,250 Workmen's Compensation: Approximately $1200 /man /year 6,600 Police Liability Insurance: Approximately $125 /man /year 688 Health & Welfare at approximately $123 /man /mo: 8,118 Uniform Allowance: $225 /man /yr: 1,238 Overhead Charge: $4819.69 /man /yr 26,508 Radio Service Charge: 8,703 Pro -rated Share of Clerk- Typist III's: 8,743 Pro -rated Share of Two (2) Sergeants: 15,920 TOTAL ESTIMATED 1983 BUDGET: $278,505 7/15/82 LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES FOR THE CITY OF FALCON HEIGHTS 1983 BUDGET ESTIMATE 51 Deputy Sheriffs, 3 shifts, 7 days a week, to operate one (1) vehicle Salaries: 51 Deputies (inc. night diff.)'- approximately $25,615 /man: Salary Increase - 10% Estimated for 1983: Overtime Pay - 1.25% of Salaries: PERA: 12% of Salaries: Mileage - 35 /mile at approximately 62,000 miles /yr: Workmen's Compensation at approximately $1200 /man /yr: Police Liability Insurance at approximately $125 /man /yr: Health & Welfare - approximately $123 /man /month: Uniform Allowance at $225 /man /yr: Overhead Charge - $4819.69 /man /yr: Radio Service Charge: Pro -rated Share of Clerk- Typist III's: 7/1A/82 $140,883 14,088 1,937 18,829 21,700 6,600 688 8,118 1,238 26,508 5,540 8,743 TOTAL ESTIMATED 1983 BUDGET: $254,872 -15- SPECIAL REPORT -B- RAMSEY COUNTY -5- YR PLAN MEMORANDUM To: From: Subject: Date: Ramsey County DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 167 Courthouse St. Paul, Minnesota 55102 (612) 298 -4127 Municipal Engineers Kenneth E. Weltzin Five -Year Plan September 23, 1982 6t,1(4tdet/ KENNETH E. WELTZIN Director and County Engineer PHYLLIS F. SPECKER Administrative Assistant The Planning Section of this department is preparing the annual update of the Five -Year Plan for Road and Bridge Construction Projects. We are scheduling a meeting at 2:30 p.m., Monday, October 4, at the Ramsey County Highway Garage to discuss the preparation of this plan and to prepare timetables and procedures for submittal of input to develop the plan. • Also, our maintenance engineer will be available to address any maintenance problems or procedures you may want to discuss. Our fleet superintendent will discuss the opportunities for equipment sharing, and other County public works staff will be available to discuss any other County /Municipal concerns you may have. I would appreciate it very much if you would attend this meeting. kew:js Att: Tentative Agenda TENTATIVE AGENDA Monday, October 4, 1982 Ramsey County Highway Garage 2:30 Introductions 2:40 Five -Year Plan (PK) Discuss Procedures to Develop Future Plans 3:30 Winter Maintenance (MDK) 3:50 Summer Maintenance (MDK) 4:05 Equipment Sharing (GLL) 4:15 General Discussion ioa;uo3 uotsoag Buusgop -aafa$ lailn0 )P a'I!Q a'pQ •x7 Mon!M ƒ ° 7 2 / E 0 7 0 ccco o 7 7 § ° \ ( \ { { 0 \ w 0 \ \ § / f • ' \ / 1 \ \ 9 1 2 ° n = � ( § a §' @ G .a @k m ( ) g \¥ \m \® \\ ]§ ]® a2 ]J R. cs ) « «/ *a E( *K i/ *( ®/ }} 0 r. {\ (\ (® 0. (/ 0 (8 « § ma \} 0 & ,& m\ .\ n co a Pi ,/ o et » 7 . § ƒ @ # ] k $ ° E ( \ ti Pi 0. 'lS CO -4 3a5V # .oad t4 OD \ \ / CO / lD \ 0, Crossing Improvement Funds gj 0 g' m 9 o as p _ CD ea x co 9 ro C G 0 t '.4 $ 5 .p. < ▪ ' CO z '"' K ;-3 I o • ti cN o)? ca rnx P4n z x x1 5 • D 0 0§ o� g � ii ca m g' o py V! x 5 O 5 = C o c4 p a .Nfl • a O D 54 A s C a • O —AC r. + =C n p S a G G = t 03 7 N p a co a o a c 5' a x ti x `e a o a v1 MI o' , ti o. a. CD 8 ' , to 0 03 x c Ve I -08d O ONO 01 en 0 a VI N 6£ILi+ OT -LL 1 01 t 0 a. N N N F. N (0 a c11 0) O) 01 0) 01 N O N 01 1 0, O N N N .+ F+ h+ N N CO 01 N. CO T O 0) Cl1 O O O 0) N O as L-1 O m 5 Tuawanoadwl 0 0 0 0 I0 a cn 0 O O y r x x z m co n ro a a o co •�• -- •~- C co G 0 G ei' O 0q a 8 f�D - £ --s ^p) C = ti co co 'a* W" P. in Pi Pi (gyp c0 0 Bpi 7 `'d Q rO• I r O 'O co NN N 'C N a CD p N p 'O c R.. 4J l] _C n DC (] �(pp fi n 4p W O e� O DG O .�.. .5+ [j fi ft G c ti n a n n^3 p m..- x w+ " `-t. w co w a c 3<1 i m o 0 o c mom n � d z '° " s r r° rti r r B co al $ 0) r. co m CD m co co I = 0 3 0 tz= yW 7 I p I' 0 I ,Y 1 0 1 0 O co o: cc = 4? 4 mp ;r VD clt cm v a 0 . = 0 a , v v? -0. W n m ro m .- = N o O d 0 0• 0 w m C 6IZLI 9T -IS N N N N cm W N -4 N v N H I-+ 0) W W O 01 us - 0 O a + O N -J O a+ N 0 ' to Po C 19 d `Po c 0 a a 0 00 P O N TIDWI # vdd 8ZZLY Z0 -069 LZZLt' CO-69 YZZL6 CO -t9 EfZLt ZO -8S us 0 00 �h Ala -4 co n N ,y 0 cn N 01 W 0) W 0) 00 00 CD w N N 1-` W N I-• O 00 N N N J G1 w N �. G1 •• I" N N Co N N O 0 N O N -4 0 0 0 C 4 9 a 'P 031_, eq. �-•� N 0 7 Or F• cn as 47 a 03 0) O 00 I-+ Cl1 '-• n cc 0 N tri Cn 5 1B •AV uolzu!xa7 ZYZLt 8I -IS N N O O 9 r 8 O luamanoaduti HVS3 # laa5' # TOrd- 4 • • luBJD ajj .LOG/WW (T) 4 I w w c p x ' r m 7 w d c C n al. C C C s•f S K $ ((0 (o H .. C d F r C C a a c < < ` 4 1 i± i ( 2 X O O 2 ro ?Cq S n ry S.d <. S 0 S y v v ' 'v .5 76 X33: C/) pi �F rx CD A- CR VI CA a co < d - �z < - • xi -x �0 � -o V1 d VT en 9• Ca �• w p. N ey N • N E f+ Op ,.p �n Or. N N N 0 N( N T o C oC .. co H co co Co M o 0 o •+ en 00 O• OC O� ODC Og 0 O a, E H - 5. C/2 °-vC m °.fy co N M N O d 3 C 0 O A r 9. 9. El x C P. Z. N N 1-• Co n rpr, r 0 0 q n 'C -+ M O • V 0 ( ' r ro wc. am 9 tt o fm cc' (T mga< 0$ ',a, o . m a� coif W C C 0 A C v C '4 o P. ro • w CO 0 0 c• Ca ---1 N0 N Va ti 000 g Ca one M0 142 A co iI 0 Ee r1. n N W N cn O t%) ct n W F+ 1-• •y v � O 01 O N CO Os WIL CO m - S O < x < m o ti 0. - a d M M C e 0 0 P. I 0 n 1 1 G o o s 1 <O .s. = 5 m n .0y '< .0 -• 'G 0 0 `< x °e a ccoo X CD (D . N •• ro 0 • �. q NNI --4 ti CI = C11-1. lo O N ^e 01 D. O 10 PJ Cl. 0 O 0 Q 0 0 • ~ ~ V • r j.4 �C 0 co cn a a te sp a rt a N < -4 m CO N O ,1s r 0 ro a 0 -f m B -M HVS3 # laaV # Wrcl 0 ^^O C az b ° 0 y Z tC 1 I � N CO Z ea pc 7d 8 3 °1"N n g r br z 0 0 0 x 0 r CI v `� C 7' �T. 7 . ° 0 0 0 G C 0 CD CD DM E; .y. f9 7' 7 M. rr rte •t rt r• et ° c < a a E,. r a tri a -, 0 a rn „W .y d d a a �' W C c.t m o d o m t $ r W. t CO c w t co m ., b o 7 G� a G o c'UC co G xl m cxlo 'i' _' m m .0 V n 3 CD mm ?r fir. Si cm 0• 0° o5 Wit" o'°', • �� �z'o co 3 o x In �n Kx (99, 1-3 ao3 a 'cr n 8• cn�m • rt. pa A� �� ti° � �� n. n �9 o a o c a 7 so r C co 7C r+. r' r: W r! o rr d O x » rn r. o `° rn° °' o to ro 3 m 7 N ,p W '�"3 .D O t ebo to co d N �--• 01 5A W N x a - �' tD W 0 d 0 O am w OZILI 20 -61 STZLV LT -S9 F• N 0 0 0 92ILV TO-St 'Al 1'61Li' t0-6I W F+ W 0 - 0 C4 0 0 Ca 0 N CO 0 0 0 c)1 f+ 1..4 to C11 rd t4 W o 01 ..4 �' -4 a o 0 0 W VI a N v C.4 0 v v 0 v.. U1 O H N N Di 0) N W f>D CD tD O 0 0 0 0 O 0 01 N 01 0 0 W O O -4 n O gip?�p 0. CO Cif 0 0 O spung EMI (g) as to ▪ to CO CO to to ti n e $ et go cn cn 0 K 0 y CDCD m w nm 0 n 6T1L6 TZ -19 OD N N 1 paoaltaU 'si3u2is Signals, Paint 10 systems O O) O7 N N N O F■ - � W CJ CO O O N 0 a O ,LOC n r 0 Tuawanoadwi 0. O O 0 OD 01 a O 1< CO .P N ea C4 03 rn rn y N N • CO O O 3 n CAD 1-3,3 10 -4 CO 0D .y+ --4 CO 0 O C21 0 CO 01 Co Q 0 O O m 0 O O N • • a 2S (n ),LtiL i,sr -.5 /Y L €; I O tc1 5 is Se Ay 91-- ,S4wmil. 70 -/oa SA-i,d k (° w ttil 4-o dicks.Wip,ate9 40,4 S ling,_ Cal f Kot S /va Dr z Lop. y - L r& ewe :�. wd5 +S *p 4 td FLtruds A�pr loo rl� t R" CO CO Cr> Ca /( // C E g e a+ N O M V' <M N N O N N N N N <1 to 4>:10 00 M tO N 'W M N c0 1 0o'0 00 °CC" w`" N CD .., to In 0 F CO CO N O N O N w N 0 -4 CO 0 an M If n 04 0 0 0 F 0 V V •%' H N ••1 QI N 0 v v v v v H 0- CO 00 T ln L70 00 N U0 M C C..4 t• 0 CO 00 t- 7 N O CD N M .--I O 0 M to 00 U ft 3 3 6 Q a r4 v a '0 a �� . b� �� v 44 el E W a+ 4., �' C v U v 0 0 Cn 0 0 O U •' 0 .c 07 QC c L. 0O ` Q F„ F 4 1 E O O U c o 'O - 'O 'O 'h U2 z 0 0 0 > a a= U= 0 3 y, y, y 1 0 1 bO+ 1 0, 0 Ca O =U3 .. . < t > � N t . >_g4 — 44 CS t �a m a Qa v ID 0 R7 0 $ C) t O ba �, T 0* c a�'+ U O+ 0 a 0 C 0 .N .,0, ,N 0 < O E�aj��� Um Um yU tO. 1 w ra 1 ti W , 'o 44 44 PC a m 4 0 6 v t 97 $.4 " T N 0 <4 ') N O, c Q Q ca 0 Ft 0 0 ` aw 0 a 0 w W w - contract awarded Keller - Johanna Erosion Contr 00 N N 00 O CO 54 -01 47221 EPA # LKG77 O to Y ti Q a ... E Q o a ., O E 0 25R v W a tn m � 0 O '0 0 1 (0 C 1 2)1R Q .>' 0 Trii c C CA a 0' N Q CO 1 o 0 U 0 a 'x C > •O i:+ C F" O c. 0 O .., 0. Ga y 2 N 0 rn L ta oQ a0 �Y 0 QS a .:x 0 m 0 t E 0 r as r. as U .c 651 0 1 aF to , 00 0 0 Q. c F `� c Q 0 Q 0 41 'O ~ t v .c O % 2 0 0 Z ° • r" w F OU ar zz t4 oa • w a 04 El W U• U h r'£ Qi a F Y 0 far Y U 0 U O *1 • 0 0 O a CO m O to N 01 CO r-1 r H 'd4 00 N 'd Cri 0 O C- .11 County Ditch 14 Repair Ditch - contract awarded CO CD 65 -19 47257 Install - 99% complete Lexington Av. at OF020 CP80 -1 .c 0 C U 0 N H H O) OJ CJ M CO H i. r-1 .1 H N ▪ M N 0 H N 0 CD H W 'M 590 -04 47230 47159, BP -6 H CO O H 48 -08 47159 29 -04 47159 23 -20 47226 CO •-4 N tD H O 0 a7 t Fairview Av. to as O G O Y O sci x" ars ate' O .0 > U Y 0 U Page 3 of 20 (1) Mn /DOT Bike Grant E- 0 aa) ca 07 U cr V' M M 'ct, 00 l- C C. M co O r-1 N N CO N 0 sr a) g a T a'' •r •N CO CO V' CO C• V' O CO 00 C p4 N N Co, 0 0 0 Proj # Acct # E 1 Y 0 0 > w A w .a) b▪ n •o a P4 'O W ( N Y R''i ti C er t • < 'O N '�' 0 .i. C CO C y C C as 0.0.11 E, o a0+ U rn . 8 • g as .2 ,pq g o o x a O a oo �r 0 o x 0" .o 00 O00 E-i 00 Y co .�O � to YN 4-' ;So I N Y N N OV g CO r2 00 O) F v) C- 'o C- 1 tM v in ti on Y in 'v im to m A ti p co o N I:4 _ 1:4 'a r-+ .r 4 i-4 CO .-a — Y N U ea M'O M O In W O,Y r� Ci Y 4) M Q1 Y 05 'O Q i'a Y 04 p.)01) • a a a'' a C a t a a rC b > g N Cn 0 • O y0 GO v 0 i0 30 0 0 =O 0 aO o o x a 0 w 0 A o i • ) 4 1 U 1 1 1 ii att C o a < a > 0 Y E W" Y aC < 6' 4 C Y 3 a) • a • > a) ran v v c> c 3 x • a) Y = 'w" w U a 0 O w 0 0 0 O N a 2 0 0 ate, W� g WW az F oz Sa 0 p a0 W p FO Oa Dy YIN V ate'. C 0 0 0 C 0) E U) 0 •E U' 0 O.4 z 2• N W0, 0 04 U cn it • r • z In en r4 0 U w a 0 z°' 0 U a4 Qi 0 O v r 0 0) Y In U o0 t- rr N o 0 o in o o- o) o 0 C- t-I M co N O CO CV C) 6-1 0 CV N ti t-1 I-1 0 w 0 CO CO ti N Y d O E tN 0 N U Willow Lk. Dike Dike & Outlet V' H In In 0 en w<r t-1 o In O O CV N Lit 'W 0 O 00 CO CO 00 0 0) CD d o N In V) or CO 00 CV t.4 1-1 C o- 1-- *or w w 00 N C) N N lt) N CV County Rd. B2, County Rd. C .0 "I ▪ O ' CO t. CO 0 0)) < ,-4 n eo x In b Y .X F ° Cll a ) y o a) a ) 4-0 Y Y Y L Y G c t- La. CC Lam. ��^ (V Y g t" W G N O 0 0�n O .c O 0 �-O' 0 0 ° xa a� o N N C E W AO 00 O I C;0 Ca" Y ' 6 cot S ' 0 ▪ L C7 U ti c0 44 cu a w >4 Wf4W 0) a) o wlnb• v v C7 0 a F z N W en 0 00 0 c 0• z 30 Ctl CO co as 0 z 0 0 w Qi r Y 0 N ai vi v c c G O 0 0 Proj # Acct # N O O O to O t(> to N O C- CO N t0 N V' N i CV v 00 v O ti N O CO CO If) ▪ O d N N ti eN O O O O CO tO N O CO .-i 51 -16 47214 65 -17 47215 19 -03 47120 65 -21 47219 Page 7 of 20 (2) FAU Funds O E- 0 0) 11f ZQ O c Y 0 U O 1D N O O O O 0 0 0 CD CO CO O O M N O O H M M CA M (0 0 0 H N 01 v N .t' N N el H H O co 0 V' 0 O O 0- V 117 N •r t- 4 a0 M 590 -02 47228 O CD CD U7 M 00 117 O N H �-1 O M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N 117 O LCD O O N 0`7 N tM H 19 -04 47194 3 m > trt M M o < 13 a E . 1 a O au O >~ Y C .0 W C - ° F C > 4 54 O 0)(/ zO ,0 O Y a) '1 go , ao o as xc) C t E mo P E ea bc C � Y o ti v q u y 7c �c �c oc >om da -, co a y 0 .0 W o O tau > 0 v, c. m 0) o w a1 d 3 a1 y Ww aY`ca U 4 z°� a .>x wry .M,w Mg c Y Y 1 1 : ca c 1 o U Q W x SZ C 0 a a a a) to 4,0 i3 3 3 3 g a g a o wS 6 w ' n o t, a >, >1 >, >, Y a) 1', c Y Y Y Y Y Y a+-' C C C C C C C C W W ,-q0 O d 0 0 U U U O O O 0 O U O U 0 0 0 ,,,..4, U p Page 8 of 20 N 0 0 O O H tR 0 b 0 O F a) O Y v od 0) v C 0 0) U C a) E 0) 0 L 0 U 0 O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 if, O O O O CD O O O O M r-1 M 10 M CO M N N 1.0 CD rl .-4 r •■ CD CD ... 0 0 tO tD N N M to t- t- 10 co O O O O N ti N 10 O O co N H H M o n o 0 0 10 N O tf) CD N O O 1.0 M Co) H H 0 o O 0 0 to 0 0 0 0 N H H M CO M N 45 -01 47156 00 > E 0 (1) VD cz v 0 •0 - 0 VI 4.? 0) V V t' et C O C 0 '00 y sV-, V. N w b oc 3c ° " xL d� y > owl 0 0 °0 COO 00 .± + v v jja) g W V O U a V M V H U 0 4- 4-) Y C N j s°.. o c x E co gi o cn a: & 0 d P4 461) n . +-. E'" -1U) xN v= yv ZU sue. w Ev o OS - v v <0 +a 0 F"v .0 a a co ccn 0a C 0 .cc 0 a) v ) a) r~ a) c. a) 4 a) m d C d E x tz a; +' a: an' a a+ > W > a: 'o x p p vs � W o .1 ° ° a; d ) � x «a d [a o 'o c• s amoc 1 '� .., a+ CO 'v C R ... m Z a+ c d 0 0 0 '0 ' w 0 ro '. CO > > a 8 1 x Q 3 3 �" a) 6- bo 8 �tn .Yc y E x ho d c .1--. wwv,w V a c w w• ` x Z 0 - as 0 a 0 0 C) ;° 4 Page 9 of 20 a 0 O 0 H as- N Qi 0 a z 0 a C4 el C4 cc O°' a oa z 0 U a) 4- y U m U Y d E 0) 0 rr E 0 m U O O O O O O O O 00 0 00 ---1 0 1 N — 0 C0 0▪ w DI "Cr ti 0 C7 CO O 0) N O tT 1-q tO N CO M N 'cM O <6i s. al A a) a el 3 E go to • W w m cn c • F c a K c scr 6n p .bb m bn in n in a W FE in in . O . W O • Y • a) 3 3 CD CCI O; 4 a a) >, y.0 c c • x r U o U a • F-' U U CO tO oad 1 system Page 10 of 20 (2) FAU Funds I.. O O F z 0 R. cn g co 0° wa 0 0 U •+ 2 O t. tp) N to v 4J O 0 co co 0 Y V V O N O 0 0 0 0 O 0 O O 0 0 O GO O 0 M O O O O O O CO N •--1 CO M CO t[) 00 O N N ■i w 0 --1 .-a n co � v v o v O u9 O N O t� n to 0 N M CO N .-i CO O N N O N H •-I LCD N O O N co M M •-1 PC >l 1 0 C C O O O 0 a0 0 Chip Seal Resurfacing, 14 mi. County -wide Lake Restoration O O O O O O O n O o O o O to N •--I M •C ri Misc. CSAH Projects Opticom, 4 systems 00 'i CO tD v R; A Y 0 co U ti > E V N cn of ,4-( C c =b.0 N c 0 O Y •-+ O O tD O 5 O O r1 ,p y N 4- 4-' M y a+ 4.) 41 C 0 v V V :a V o c c d F. to 0 0 c a E 8 °C °C FC yC CO L .6D . c, c° a 0 �' 0 +O' U V D� U a, a ai N < � R'i `r R: CO R+ tD R: � R; R'r 'NO R.' O E a N C7 al c (q a) a) 1 1 a r4 ° m = cam. 3 3 00 .. W 5 v i"4- C ea x 6 >, >, a> >, a v C G .,N^., (0 E" N '0 C g W W O O 0 V ^>' V 0 C U o w w O co U �°� 0 0 0 i-1 0 C O U Y 0 0 0) 0 0) a> E m 0 L E o 0 0 0 0 0• m 0 o 1-• 1 0 00 CO 00 CO m 'CV ••1 0 0 a) CD 11) H CD 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 00 CO CO 0 C ✓ 0 Sand Seal Resurfacing, 6 mi. County -wide Signal Systems, Mn /DOT N X x T1 T3 Y P fY aa) .1. .4 ??.4 >1.4 OA Y tars = N O - 6 • it OW UM If4C0 O , 6.0 E y S w Y as x a x ) 0) 0) a a a 1 4 = as > > > c t a) ;-+ O O W in rn r) C) '1 10 CD 10 systems road 1 system Page 12 of 20 O 0 Y U r7 W 0 U x GO U O N O O O O O O O O O O O CD O O 'M O O O O 0 0 0 CO M O CO CO ti 'W v O O ti to N CO .4 tf) N O N CD rn o g i d E get County -wide Chip Seal Resurfacing, 14 mi. Lake Restoration O O O O O O O O O N M O O 10 O O 1f) O e-1 N N N '-I O O N O O O O O O O n o 0 1n o 0 0 N 1f) (D N N (O M Misc. CSAH Projects Opticom, 4 systems CO CO CO Page 13 of 20 m o A C t o GO 0 E y a x •0 0 ° 0 y o 0 o v o too 0 ai U U C U > 0 (O U co U y U 110 4-1 a � F V) Y L� 41 E c, 0 0 0 0 C - o C co F C bDC O U 0 • �0 t) " M0 ' 00 G ,0 65 g to W < YY a M C W `" W a) W V C/] CO S. CD T C 1 r. .fir r 7 t.4 44 C/j 4 N 1 M H 1 1 'O C o .o .o < W Q W 0 as 3 3 3 W a > .c a y >1 >1 C a w <a n-t 0 7 0 N E eu x y ww 0 0 0 a U 0 0 0 0 w x 0 m 0 0 0 .-i to Vi C P4 0 0 a F z 0 a In g OD '" CID a 0 U D.+ W F d v 6 rn 0 Proj # Acct # C d 0 E 0 0 o m 0 I�fl N ti �-1 CO O tD cY CD CO 0 IC 10 o .-I r) ti co o r n o u7 at, cM .•■ M 03 -03 47155 ^ M CO C 00 en D oN V C '..� N H .0 v a) t~. W M '0 to) C F O N J ag �. E o cg 0, wwy Y :12 aV. ti by R'+ N C pp a+ C Gco U Vi .-i A ?3 0.i C .� N G E w aat E °'a) o xm w .was Fw aF ar a > a� 63 .8 o r „AG) a) to _1 NI _ ti d �" �' F. Qi N Ul V] V] Vl N E Oa) a) > da o '" R 0 o K W �K � 0) 0) 'p V'0 0 ctS .p 0 O 'O 'O co t. g. C4 a 3 3 y 0 �� Di N O. fY (nW O0 0 0 O 0 0 0 ./.....-...-.. 0 0 0 0 w 0 0 0 anti CZ 0 •r O O CC cH .- O Page 14 of 20 0 F x 0 cn 00 0c D 0 W H L a) 0 a) t ti F 0 U U Y O 0 N 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 CO 0 0 0 M 0 0 0 0 CO 0 00 CO CO O CO 0 O I!1 M .- r N O O w H N vi In o O n ti o N eM O O O O O O f M O N O O t(i r-i .••1 O O O O O O O O CO o O O o N N lf) lf) 0) O) N C CA •• a c 0 a >> O a 0 a o 0 U,,, Z a) - o a 0 a) d CO 3 O o o 0 o (� ta Y �0 a N Fo 0 00 C a x Y Y O d U G U E 0 y yU m vv)i .,1.4 .. EL s:. > ci V] 0> �" U O N C "a C �'' C OF N 0 d 0 a) vU•i U ~ 0 0)) L. U , o xa g cz H o U N < 0 x ' ro eo c. 'o o Po > 3 3 a) 3 3 3 W a O T 1 ;, ''T ›.) A >> C w - U o o = t o 0 0 E oa U U 3 U U U U U x i White Bear Av. to T.H. 120 Page 15 of 20 0 0 0 '0 4) 4 4.4 co U Y 0 0 Y v C Q1 E s. E 0 0 n d o CO o M .-i O O tO N H N .-1 C- O 0 N O 10 oa aa' a- Z ri CO aa) t- a v 0 U ) a) -6 P a 3 3 >5 >. o 0 0 U 0 0 O ll, r-1 H Resurfacing Overlay, 4 mi. Sand Seal Resurfacing, 6 mi. N 0 N o 0 11a ti to County Rd. B CD Signals, Mn /DOT Systems Signals, Paint 10 systems ■ 0 (O Signals, Railroad 1 system Page 16 of 20 CO V C aaC W iii a-` d G Q Ea) o q, Ea " a) bn,ga 'O co m wU:1: wt w o o CO U U U c...1nr; O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o v) O o o co 0 o m O o co ti .••� o o ao o- of 0 c- <4 c0 n 4-J b O v v 000 0 0 V) O N Cr) O O O O O O O O O If) O (0 O O t0 O t0 N '•1 H .4' .-i 1-1 N A Y 0 G O o 0 0 O O O O O O O O O N O O O O O O O O N W t0 <4 0) f0 o N Y En ~ 'O a > C4 o 3 ° H a ... C.) o ca in a Y Y F v1 Y oo ) . 3 to k E-F •r. 3 > 0 N0 Y O y Q U M W O S o 6 Y O D O Y Y Y 0 Y 00 Y Q . U > o W o a o U Y u � Y y. Y 0 t a P. v m � s. M a 0 v r..., (-4 a+ 0 1. N v S.' 0 F co EL E Y cam. N aj a) N a) V) V) V) Y CA Y V) • N .X V] v) x V) E • yE 0 c0 -0 n0 �0 (00 xo '- 0 `-o ao .t o t. E • 0 q� EF E °'a aa)ig ai� oa x� �a >� o� ?WO' U Y ol 0 A Z F 0 V] > N w C 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 U .p . > Pa P] CO W W W W x CO g = y a a a a a g a 1:5 0 a N N N Y y Y N c o o. > a i o y o 7 a o 0 Y cq - 0 O O O O O O O aU 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Page 17 of 20 (2) FAU Funds 0I 0 N Y 0 Proj # Acct # a) u 0 o o 0 o O O o o o 1() M O O O O O 00 V4 N U9 'W CO O O O O O O O N O O O - . l �-i M N .--I O O w o 0 0 M M O O O O N o o O o CO M O O CO CO A a a Pa a A >a h .15 e. .N a u o_ 6 0 c c. a) N ° a m wo °a == o= ~ �a a c G G „ 0) CD to y X TOY y .� O U O O o . O N +i +4 v • 7. U u u o u a u uu I � ti L y . ° • a 4 a ca O CA e.i c .c � cw CS Cn <c u .0 al tn �' a0 0 +a tia) d oa a w aUqLa b& n rga 1 a c Fa -a t o t 1 0 a) CO > a a PP 1 > c as 0 d x ❑ Y o u w > - w E a °b_n a s c d a) U a 3 `� o `' > T bp ca E a d as 0 o c c o c k 3 a a x a a` p cn in > a Z 0 0 Page 18 of 20 (7) Federal Bridge Replacement Funds 2 0 O z W O aw M cn a° �z a pz w z 0 U C t_. a) Y Y 03 co U Y 0 U cn U Proj # Acct # Y 0) E 0 Y 0 0 a O O O O O O O O to tt) to 00 00 00 00 CO CO 00 CO CO <O w N H r ti CD N to N tf) tf4 '-1 '•1 O •M O O <1' O O O O 00 00 00 00 00 CO 00 00 m '-I c, v d a a < ..a. .4 4E War U ar 2 .E > o p p w t''. >, �A d. Wi a.4 <,5 U NU mU C co to co Y C as .L. C >, 07 ., co t. C V] .. N a, `" t„t C C C › C C C Y C Y C a) C fL 0., W U bD ,�y'• tip o h0 bD b0 C b0 C go 4. bb .5 p p x Q • N F� U� a, �V) o� o� �� , F ,, Y 0 0 ri YY al ▪ al cci a 1:".:1 Y ` a W W W U 0 p • co W •o W 0.1 a > > a a • < a a a Y a a Y Y L N Y t a Y Y I-1 • co E E ^+ U boo C o 0 0 C Ca C 0 U U m U U x x ,-07 0 Page 19 of 20 a 0 a z W O E cg 3a I co 0 pz a z 0 U D-4 Y 0) 0 E 0 U 0 lc> v) to V) V) U) LO O O CO CD CD 10 CO tO CO O O H - - .-1 r-1 0-1 '-1 1 -1 r-/ N N L� N N v N CV 4 VJ VS V) Vi 0.1 v-1 H .-1 M M 00 V• S ▪ • CCD N N N C- N O0 00 00 00 r1 N N VJ V> N CV eN N 1:3 o c CO �� wv' a co °� .c Cr) va as �U U U 0)U cn0 �U YU a 0 O E OO ,• d O da a > � F.-1 F cn x 1.75 Y as W Y aJ • as as W ▪ Ip of 0 U 6 . ' a a a w W < • 0) 0) • 3 a a a a a T a a as c a d N > ' > _ a a O as as O U a a c4 rn cn U 0 0 N W 0 O N 0) 0 (2) FAU Funds S311Vi tl 31VoS -39ci j0 '219 EN(1N C No11d11-IIEVH3Z! 110 .11vvitOv d3`ed 4W-,) -394M2 A3i1 (861 W\71 190-Jd _I-N3IDUBCf i.1Nf10D )c SWNV AINf1Oo A3SPVd WVBDOBd 11Vaa -S LLNBOD aaswvu - NOLLDfB.LSN00 dO BVaa QasOdMid " 0 �'", m " tn c ~ 0, o Via ., to ~'" tk a cn " t- gg t- " aa,LLIwans SUNLU Boa xoLLVOrldav AIM0 Saxnd a.LV,LS Boa rIglnrta SQNnd NOLLVISIIlVHa2 'IVBaaad BOd a'IaiDI'Ia SUNEld .LNawaav'Iaau 'IVBaaaa Boa a'IIaIDI'Ia X X k r WVBOOBd 3DQIB11 I86I L,LNI300 aaswvB - xoLVZLBOIBd ` tO °° °i ° AONaIOIdaQ /O NOLLVZLI IBOIBd aVS a"'r'onwCVc 0 V' c+) 7' co Mv - In -orn 1n -o CC-O t.M .-71M .. .. 4,553 DNIL v B ADNaIOIddnS 'Ivuaaad n' ; 41.8 35.5 60.5 73.9 65.4 56.4 HRH nx aOQIBa r• Cr) M O O 90413 90390 7231 4513 4984 90388 90389 7035 90407 BaawaN avou N2 5- 12 4 1vMN. -1rn4 LOCATION Keller Parkway over Kohiman Creek Arcade Street over Keller - Gervais Channel County Road D under BNRR* Larpenteur Avenue over Soo Line RR ** ' Long Lake Road over Rice Creek Parkway Drive over Keller Canal County Road I over Rice Creek County Road C over BNRR County Road F over Sucker Creek Lexington Avenue over Rice Creek New Brighton Road under Soo Line RR* • Y c 0) E 0 as °a rgi a g o N d v t) • • SPECIAL REPORT -C- GAME ROOMS page -I- proposed additions to game room. Pages -2- and 3- present game room ord. ( ]Little Canada Ord) Pages -4 -and -5- present ord.on minors in public places ( Little Canada Ord.) Page -6- Little Canada Ord. pertaining to liquor licenses distance from public places and churches Pages -7- thru -10- Blains ord. pertaining to amusement centers. Page -11- Fees other communities PROPOSED ADDITIONS TO SEC. -811 - Game Rooms ( USE BLAINE'S ORD. 755 AS GUIDE) 811 -010- ADD -3- AMUSEMENT CENTERS ( principle income) add -4- Provide a certicate of Insurance. ( City to be held harmless) ( Ins. coverage $ 100 /000•. Add -5- No amusement center to be loaced within 800 ft of any school or church located within the City. AMUSEMENT CENTERS SUBJECT TO BUILDING = &- FIRE CODES PROPOSED FEES $ 100.00 pr yr. ( machines -1- to 5 -) $ 100.00 pr yr and $ 10.00 for each machime -5- and over. BUSINESS WITH -5- or less machines WOULD PAY $ 10. pr machine. I.!_ .(::.. f\NAL 811. GAME ROOMS 811.010. DEFINITIONS. For the purpose of this Chapter, certain terms and words are defined as follows: 1. Game Room. Any room or area, open to the public, located within a building or structure, such as a bar, restaurant, lounge, supper club or bowling establishment, the purpose and use of which is to provide amusement or entertainment through the operation of mechnical amusement devices. 2. Mechanical Amusement Device. Any machine or device which operates or may be operated by the public by inserting a coin or coins therein and intended for entertainment or amusement. This definition includes such devices as pin ball machines, table shuffleboard games, table hockey and soccer games, electronic devices, motion picture machines, and all other machines and devices which operate or are operated for the entertainent or amusement of the public. 811.020. LICENSE REQUIRED. No person, firm or corporation shall own or operate a game room within the City of Little Canada without first having applied for and received a license therefore as hereinafter provided. 811.030. APPLICATION. Each applicant for a game room license shall apply to the City Clerk upon such forms as are provided by the City and shall answer all questions and provide all information required on said form. 811.040. LICENSE FEE. Game room licenses shall be issued for one (1) year periods to qualified applicants. The annual license f '--' is One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) and upon applicant's initial application, 0:.id fee shall be paid at the time of making application. In the event said application is rejected, the full fee shall be refunded. 811.050. REVOCATION. Any license granted pursuant to this Chapter may be suspended or revoked by the City Council at any time without a hearing or notice to licensee. 811.060. HOURS OF OPERATION. All game rooms, as herein defined, shall close by 10:00 o'clock p.m. and shall not open for business earlier than 9:00 o'clock a.m. Excepted from this requirement are those game rooms which operate in conjunction with a bar, supper club, tavern, or similar establishment. In those cases the closing time shall be no earlier than the lawful closing time of said establishment. 9 r.� .CALI, Q43 811.070. INCONSISTENCIES WITH OTHER ORDINANCES. Whenever any provisions of this ordinance are inconsistent with the provisions of other parts of the Little Canda Code, such as Section 1202.010 governing curfew hours, the provisions herein shall supersede such other inconsistent provisions. 811.080. PENALTIES. Every person convicted of a violation of this ordinance shall be punished by a fine of not more than Three Hundred Dollars ($300.00) or by imprisonment for a period of not more than ninety (90) days, or both, and in either case the costs of prosecution may be added. (Source: Ord. 137) 812. LICENSING OF TREE REMOVAL CONTRACTORS. 812.0 ,1 LICENSE REQUIRED. No person shall fell, Lt, trim, or remove any tree or hire within the City, the branches of whir4h are two or more inches thick at the point of severance, without a licens. 812.020. APP :.,CATION. Applications for such license shall be filed with the City Clerk.', The application shall contain / he name and address of the applicant; whethe the applicant is an indiy`3dual, partnership or corporation; and the mak:., style and number of trucks or other vehicles to be used by the applicant in the business of tree' trimming or hauling. The license fee required by t is Chapter shall accompany the application and a receipt therefor shall be att ched to the application. In addition, a policy of insurance required by thisiapter shall „ -be attached to said application. 812.030. LICENSE FEE. The-license fee shall be Thirty Five Dolars ($35.00) per year. �1 /�_ 812.040. INSURANCE. Each /1icene shall file with the City Clerk an insurance policy issued by an i:Asurance” ompany authorized to do business in the State of Minnesota. Said pdiicy shall insure the licensee in the sum of at least Twenty Five Thousane Dollars 025,6'40.00) against liability imposed by law on account of bodily /injury or death of ' any person or persons not covered by Workmen's Compen ation Law, and in the"�$um of at least Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000.00) against liability imposed by 13th on account of damage to or destruction of property, in connection with the filing, cutting, trimming or hauling of trees for, ire. The policy shall be endob ed to provide that it may not be cancelled by the carrier except upon a ten (10 day written notice to the City Clerk. 1 n the event such insurance is so ancelled and the licensee shall fail replace the insurance with a substi to policy, his license shall be . ` tomatically suspended until proof of such insurance shall be provided to the/City Clerk. 1202. MINORS IN PUBLIC PLACES 1202.010. MINORS. It shall be unlawful for any minor under the age of eighteen (18) years to loiter, idle or be in or upon the public streets, highways, roads, alleys, parks, playgrounds or other public grounds, public places and public buildings, places of amusement, entertainment, or refreshment, vacant lots or other unsupervised places between the hours of 10:00 o'clock p.m. and 5:00 o'clock a.m. the following day; provided, however, that the provision of this Section shall not apply to such minor accompanied by his or her parent, guardian or other having the care and custody of the minor or when the minor is upon some necessary errand by permission or direction of his or her parents, guardian or other adult person having the care and custody of the minor, which said permission shall be in writing and signed by such parent, guardian or other adult person having the care and custody of the minor. 1202.020. CUSTODY OF MINOR AND RESPONSIBILITY. It shall be unlawful for the parent, guardian or other adult having the care and custody of a minor under the age of eighteen (18) years of age to permit such minor to loiter, idle or be in or upon the public streets, highways, roads, alleys, parks, playgrounds, or other public grounds, public places and buildings, places of amusement, entertainment or refreshment, vacant lots, or other unsupervised places between the hours of 10:00 o'clock p.m. and 5:00 o'clock a.m. of the following day; provided, however that the provisions of this Section shall not apply when the minor is accompanied by his or her parent, guardian or other adult person having the care and custody of the minor or when the minor is upon some necessary errand by permission or direction of his or her parent, guardian or other adult person having the care and custody of the minor. 1202.030. MANAGEMENT OF PUBLIC PLACE. It shall be unlawful for any person, firm or corporation operating or in charge of any place of amusement, entertainment, or refreshment to permit any minor under t:Ld age of eighteen (18) years of age to remain in such place during the hours prohibited by this Code; provided, however that the provisions of this Code shall not apply when such minor is accompanied by his or her parent, guardian or other adult person having the care and custody of the minor. 1202.040. SCHOOL NIGHTS DESIGNATED BY MAYOR UPON REQUEST. The Mayor, upon the request of the Superintendent of the Public Schools of the City of Little Canada, may designate certain nights during the school year as "school nights" at such times as said schools shall be engaged in athletic, musical, dramatic or social activities for the benefit or entertainment of its students. The provisions of Sections 1202.010 and 1202.020 of this Code shall not apply to any student under the age of eighteen (18) years of age or to his parent, guardian or other adult person having the care and custody of such minor who is lawfully going to, attending or returning from any such school function on any designated "school night" or "youth night ". 1202.050. VIOLATION. Any minor under the age of eighteen (18) years, parent, guardian or other adult person having the care and custody of a minor under the age of eighteen (18) years, or any person, firm or corporation, who shall violate any of the terms or provisions of this Code shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and shall, upon conviction, be punished according to law. (Source: Ord. 32) 1203. DISCHARGE AND CONCEALMENT 1203.010. DISCHARGE OF FIREARMS. to shoot or discharge any gun, revolver, description within the City, whether the loaded or bla propellent. explode any pre nitroglycerin, dy explosive material, specifically authorize It shall be unlawful for any person pistol or firearms of any kind or same be loaded cartridges, or any kind of explosive or p shall be unlawful for any person to ration of potash, mixture of su mite, plastic explosive, firewo and all such acts are he by permit issued by the Ci'y. powder and ball, cussion or pressure shoot, discharge, or hur and saltpeter, s, or any other kind of eby prohibited unless 1203.020. CONCEALED `, APONS. It sh. 1 be unlawful for any person within the limits of Little anada to ca.ry or wear concealed about his person, any pistol, dagger, swi \ h blade •-nife, bowie knife,.razor, metal knuckles, or any other dangerous o , deadly `weapons. 1203.030. TERM. The term f -arms, as used in this Code, shall include gas guns, pressure guns, air ;. ns, \pr other guns. 1203.040. CONFISCATION BY;CITY. Any we =•.ons or explosive materials duly adjudged by the Municipal Curt to have been'`ischarged, worn or carried in violation of this Code shal be confiscated a^a such weapons shall be turned over to the Chief of P.lice of the City of I;'..tle Canada to be kept, sold or disposed of in the man r herein provided. 1203.050. USE BY confiscated pursuant to thi if such are adaptable to would be dangerous to rei in the discretion of the which may be safely plac police at public aucti of such sale. ITTLE CANADA POLICE. Any weapo.s or materials Code may be kept or used by the police department police purposes. Any weapons and materials which roduce into channels of private sale or use, may, City police, be destroyed. Any weapons or materials d in the hands of private owners may be sold by the n pursuant to at least two (2) weeks published notice r 703.060. LIMITATION OF LICENSE. (1) No license shall be issued for premises located within an area wherein such use of the premises is prohibited by the zoning ordinance, nor within an area where such sales are forbidden by the state law or any other ordinance of the City. (2) No license.shall be issued for premises located within 800 feet of any school building or church located within the City. The method of measurement to be used for determining such distance shall be the shortest distance (straight line) between the buildings, measured from the point on each building which is closest to the other building. (3) No "off sale" license shall be issued for any place where non- intoxicating malt beverages shall be sold for consumption on the premises. (4) No license shall be issued to any person in connection with the premises of another to whom no license could be issued under the provisions of the State Liquor Control Act provided, however, that this provision shall not prevent the granting of a license to a proper lessee by reason of the fact that he shall lease premises to a minor, non - citizen, or a person who has been convicted of a crime other than a violation of this Chapter or the Liquor Control Act. (5) Not more indirectly issued to any shall any retailer's "on issued for any place for (6) Not more municipality. than one retailer's license shall be directly or one person or for any one place in the City, nor sale" or "off sale" license be directly or indirectly which a license of another class has been granted. than one license shall be issued to any .person in the 703.070. LICENSE CONDITIONS. (1) Any act by any clerk, barkeeper, agent, servant or employee of any licensee hereunder, in violation of this Chapter, shall be deemed the act of the employer and licensee r_ such place as well as that of said clerk, barkeeper, agent, servant or employee, and every such employer and licensee shall be liable to all the penalties provided for the violation of same, equally with said clerk, barkeeper, agent, servant or employee. (2) Any sale of intoxicating liquor by any clerk, barkeeper, agent, servant or employee made in or from any place duly licensed to sell non - intoxicating malt liquor but not duly licensed to sell intoxicating liquor shall be deemed the act of the employer and licensee, as well as that of the person actually making the sale, and every such employer and licensee of such place shall be liable to all the penalties provided for such sale, equally with the person actually making the same. (3) All sales shall be made in full view of the public. CITY OF BLAINE ORDINANCE NO. 755 -. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE IV, CHAPTER 4, OF THE BLAINE MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO AMUSEMENT CENTERS AND AMUSEMENT DEVICES THE CITY OF BLAINE DOES ORDAIN: Article IV of Chapter 4 of the Blaine City Code is amended to read: (Added portions are underscored and deleted portions are shown in brackets.) Sec. 4 -40. Definitions For the purpose of this article, the following terms shall have the respective meanings ascribed to them: Amusement Center: Any room, place or space available for public patronage, operated as a business, which utilizes in its operation equipment and games [amusement devices], including, but not limited to, pool tables, billiard tables, table tennis tables, foosball tables, pinball machines, or any mechnical or electronic amusement device, and which derives its [the] principal source of revenue [of which is derived] from the use and operation of such equipment and games [devices]. An amusement center as defined in this article shall not include bowling alleys. Amusement device: An "amusement device" is an electronic or mechanical game of skill or chance, requiring the payment of money to play or operate. An "amusement device" is not a "gambling device" as defined by Minnesota Statutes. Operate: To conduct, manage, supervise, maintain or keep. Sec. 4 -41. License for Operation of an Amusement Center and Amusement Device [Required]. (1) No person shall operate an amusement center within the limits of the City without an amusement center [a] licerse and a special use permit, pursuant to Section 34.15 (a) of the Zoning Code. (2) No person shall operate an amusement device within the City without an amusement device license. (3) Operation of four (4) or more amusement devices in a business establishment is prohibited, unless the premises is licensed as an amusement center. Section 4 -42. Same - Application Applications for an amusement center and amusement device [a] license shall be made in writing to the City Clerk and shall be verified by the applicant and accompanied by the license fee required below. The application shall contain such information as may be required, including, but not limited to, the following: Ordinance No. 755 - Page Two (1) The names and addresses of the property owner, the business owner, the lessee, the manager and the operator and the names and addresses of the owner and lessee of the amusement device. If any of the above, are acting on behalf of a corporation, the names and addresses of the shareholders, officers and board of directors shall be filed with the application. (2) The address and location of the place where the amusement center and amusement device will be operated. (3) The number and types of devices to be used. (4) The hours of operation. (5) In addition to the above, the applicant shall submit at the time of the application a site plan of the premises showing location of amusement devices, sanitary facilities and parking provisions for vehicles and bicycles. (6) The applicant for an amusement center license shall provide the City with a Certificate of Insurance evidencing liability coverage in the amount of $100,000/$300,000 with a provision that the City be held harmless. [(6)] (7) Such other information as the Council may require. Sec. 4 -43. Same -Fee (1) The amusement center license fee of fifty dollars ($50.00) for each license year or fraction thereof. If the application for an amusement center license or amusement device license is denied, the license fee shall be returned to the applicant. (2) The annual amusement device license fee shall be thirty - five dollars ($35.00) for each device located on the premises of a licensed amusement center, and shall be one hundred dollars ($100.00) for each device located in a business escablishment which is not a licensed amusement center. Sec. 4 -44. Same - Issuance; facilities; expiration (1) [(a)] No amusement center license shall be issued by the Council unless the applicant has demonstrated that the place to be licensed is properly ventilated and equipped with necessary tiolets, washrooms and similar public facilities, and that the place to be licensed will not become a public nuisance or detrimental to public safety, morals or welfare, The location of an amusement device shall not create a public nuisance or a condition detrimental to public safety, morals or welfare. (2) [(b)] All licenses shall expire on the thirty -first day of December following their issuance. 8 Ordinance No. 755 - Page Three A Sec. 4 -45. Same - Conditions (1) No amusement center shall be located within 1,500 feet of any public or private school. (2) No amusement center shall be located within S00 feet of any residential zoning district. (3) An adult, manager, at least 21 years of age, shall be on the premises of an amusement center during all hours of operation. The manager's primary duties shall be the supervision of the use and operation of amusement devices. (4) No amusement devices shall be operated between the hours of 12:00 midnight and 7:00 A.M. except on the premises licensed to serve intoxicating liquor. (5) The licensee and his employees and agents shall adhere to the provisions of the City Code relating to minors. No licensee, nor its employees or agents, shall knowingly permit a minor to be present on the premises in violation of curfew laws, nor knowingly permit a person under the age of 17 years to be present on the premises when school is in session unless on a valid excused absence. (6) An amusement center shall be deemed a public place, as regulated by Blaine City Code Sections 13 -5, 13 -6, and 13 -8. (7) The licensee of an amusement center shall not permit intoxi- cated persons to remain on the premises. (8) The amusement center and the premises in which amusement devices are located shall conform to all building and fire prevention codes 0± the City of Blaine. The building inspector or fire inspector may enter said premises at any time durin normal business hours, for the purpose of inspecting said premises for fire hazards. All law enforcement personnel of the City of Blaine shall have the right to enter said premises at any time during normal business hours, for the purpose of enforcement of the terms of this article. (9) The Council may impose conditions upon the license pertaining to the hours of operation of the establishment and the amusement device and other conditions which will enable the licensee to control the conduct of the occupants of the amusement center and the persons operating the amusement device. Sec. 4 -46 The Council may, after notice and hearing, revoke any license issued under this article if the licensee is convicted of any violation of an ordinance, state law, or federal law relating to the use, sale or possession of non - intoxicating liquor or intoxicating liquor or use or possession of gambling devices, or of any violation of Minnesota Statues, Chapter 617, as amended, or of any violation of Chapter 13 of this Code. 9 Ordinance No. 755 - Page Four The conviction of a person, while an occupant of the licensed premises, of a violation of any of the above described ordinances, state laws or federal laws shall also be grounds for revocation of the license. The violation of any condition of the license shall be grounds for revocation of the license. Sec. 4 -47. Existing Amusement Devices Any person operating an amusement device within the City shall comply with this ordinance within thirty (30) days of its effective date. Sec. 4 -48. Exemptions Bowling alleys and those estaYlishments licensed to serve intoxicating liquor under Article IV of this Ccde and those establishments licensed to serve intoxicating liquor -. 1nder the Club On -Sale Retail License are not amusement centers as regulates by this ordinance. All other licensing requirements shall pertain to the amusement devices located upon the premises of said establishments. INTRODUCED AND READ in full this 14th day of June, 1982. PASSED by the Blaine City Council this 1 S+ day ofd_, 1982. ATTEST: /-Th. /- 1 /y' / l�ti tOL Joyce Twis-tol, City Clerk Francis Fogerty, Ma Published in the Blaine- Spring Lake. Park Life July 9, 1982. �() City Bloomington Columbia Heights Cottage Grove Crystal Faribault Mendota Owatonna Mechanical Amusement Devices Machine Premises $33.50 $- temp.-10.50/machine max. - 300 6o 10 95 10 30 (max. - 500) Richfield - St. Peter 15 - Scanlon - 150 (1 - 5 machines) 200 (6 - 10 machines) 250 (11 - 15 machines) + $10 /machine in excess of 15 500* arcades only - $400 + $10 /machine in excess of 10 100 Shoreview 35 Spicer Springfield 10 West St. Paul 40 Wyoming 2 * Arcade -$150 - max. 15 machines ** License from May 1 to Sept. 30 is one -half annual fee 15 (0 - 5 machines) 25 (5 - 20 machines) 35 (20 - 50 machines) 50 ** (more than 50 machines) 400