Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />MARCH 22, 2006 <br />The City Planner reported that the City made some changes to the <br />Business-Warehouse (B-W) District which inadvertently had the impact of <br />eliminating outdoor storage as a conditional use in the Light Industrial <br />(I-1) District. Therefore, the proposed Text Amendment is a correction <br />that re-establishes outdoor storage by CUP. <br />There was no one present from the general public wishing to comment on <br />this matter. <br />Mr. LaValle introduced Che following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION NO. 2006-3-73 - ADOPTING AN ORDINANCE <br />AMENDING CHAPTER 974 OF THE LITTLE CANADA CITY <br />CODE, KNOWN AS THE ZONING ORDINANCE, BY PROVIDING <br />FOR OUTDOOR STORAGE BY CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT IN <br />THE I-7, LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Montour. <br />Ayes (5). <br />Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted. <br />TEXT Blesener opened the Public Hearing to consider a proposed Text <br />AMENDMENT- Amendment Co the Zoning Code amending Section 921 establishing <br />CUP revocation and due process procedures for Conditional Use Permits <br />REVOCATION and 921.O10.E. eliminating the word "variance" and substituting the <br />AND DUE phrase "amendment, interim use permit, or conditional use permit". <br />PROCESS The City Planner and the Planning Commission recommended approval <br />PROCEDURES of the proposed Text Amendment. <br />The City Planner reported that the proposed changes would expand the <br />City's enforcement provisions, noting that currently the only enforcement <br />option listed in the Code is revocation. The amendment established a due <br />process for revocation as well as states that the City may issue citations <br />relative to violations. <br />The City Attorney recommended the addition of the word "due" before <br />process in paragraph E. as well as change the reference in that same <br />paragraph from Section 925 to Section 925.020. <br />There was no one present from the general public wishing to comment on <br />this matter. <br />Upon motion by LaValle, seconded by Montour, the public hearing was <br />closed. <br />12 <br />