My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-14-1982 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1982
>
07-14-1982 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/7/2014 9:23:28 AM
Creation date
5/21/2013 10:43:06 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
94
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />Planning <br />Commission <br />(7 July 1, 1982 <br />Johanson matters going just to the Council and not to the Planning commission. <br />Variance Mr. Costa commented that he had no objection if it saved the applicant <br />(Cont.) money. Mr. LeMay agreed. <br />Mr. LeMay recommended that the ordinance be amended. The Planner <br />commented that if this were done, the City must set certain standards <br />and sizes. Mr. LeMay stated that he wanted to get away from some of <br />these fees. <br />Mr. Nielson stated that a screen house near the water must be subject <br />to some sort of review. <br />Mr. DeLonais suggested that the matter be handled under the proposed <br />shoreline ordinance. <br />Mr. Nielson stated that if the Commission was in favor of including <br />this in the shoreline ordinance, the Commission should act on the <br />variance request subject to the provisions in the ordinance being <br />drafted. <br />Mr. Costa commented that the Commission would like it so that if <br />someone wanted to put up a small structure on the lake it does not <br />cost them $300 in City fees. <br />Mr. LeMay commented that the variance approval should not be tied to <br />the provisions being drafted in the shoreline ordinance. Mr. LeMay <br />felt the matter would best be handled by two separate motions. <br />Mr. Querin stated that there could be some link if the matter was handled <br />in one motion. Mr. Querin stated that the only reason to link the two <br />together would be if the City would consider returning the fees paid <br />by Mr. Johnason. <br />Mr. DeLonais made a motion approving the variance for Mr. Johanson for <br />the construction of a screen house. <br />Motion seconded by Mr. Ducharme. <br />Motion carried 5 — 0. <br />Mr. French commented that he felt the size of the fees involved were <br />ridiculous and stated that some of the fee should be returned. <br />Jespersen Mr. Jespersen appeared before the Commission requesting approval of <br />Final Plat his final plat. Mr. Jespersen stated that the final plat is the same <br />as the preliminary plat. Mr. Jespersen commented that his surveyors <br />will have everything ready for the July 14 Council meeting. <br />Mr. French asked if the plat met the recommendations of the City <br />Engineer. Mr. Jespersen replied that it did. <br />Page —3— <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.