Laserfiche WebLink
Little Canada Planning Commission, <br />Mayor and City Council <br />1 February 1982 <br />Page Two <br />1. Land Use. In spite of the existance of a number of residential dwell- <br />ings, the area in question has been planned and zoned for commercial <br />use for quite some time. The B -3, General Business District is Little <br />Canada's most intense commercial zoning district. As such, the proposed <br />shopping center is relatively unlimited as to the types of commercial <br />activity which can occupy the site. <br />2. Resubdivision. The applicant intends to purchase portions of Lots 1 -4 and <br />combine them with Lots 49, 50, 51, 36 and potentially 35. The eroposed <br />shopping center would then utilize only a portion of the resulting land <br />parcel. Due to the number of separate land pieces being assembled, it <br />is recommended that the property in question be replatted based upon the <br />provisions of the Little Canada Subdivision Ordinance. <br />Since the Eisenmenger plat is quite old, a number of issues can be re- <br />solved through replatting. First, unnecessary lot lines will be eliminated. <br />This is important because the proposed structure crosses several existing <br />lot lines. Previous drainage and utility easements, if any, are eliminated <br />and new easements can be acquired as necessary to the proposed subdivision. <br />Finally, important development data (e.g. existing site conditions, topo- <br />graphic information, proposed grading, etc.) is provided under the platt- <br />ing requirements. <br />An issue related to resubdivision is park dedication. In our estimation, <br />the project, whether platted or divided by metes and bounds, is subject <br />to the requirements of Ordinance No. 172. This should be verified by <br />the City Attorney. <br />In view of the commercial nature of the area and the proximity to exist- <br />ing recreational facilities to the north, it is presumed that the City <br />will require cash in lieu of land as provided for in Section 2101.020, <br />2 (c). It is suggested that the project be referred to the Parks <br />Commission for a recommendation on this issue. <br />3. Site Plan. Review of the proposed site plan indicates that the proposed <br />development will comply with the lot requirements, setbacks and build- <br />ing requirements of Sections 912.050 and 912.060 of the Zoning Ordinance <br />once the property is replatted. <br />In terms of the proposed liquor store, it should be pointed out that the <br />developer must demonstrate that the building will not be within 800 feet <br />of any existing school building or church. <br />