My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-20-06 Council Workshop Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
11-20-06 Council Workshop Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 1:34:33 PM
Creation date
4/22/2008 10:57:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />NOVEMBER 20, 2006 <br />Keis noted that the Watershed standard for one acre of disturbance is more <br />stringent than the NEMO standu~d. Keis estimated that a one acre site was <br />the equivalent of four minimum sized residential lots. He did not feel the <br />City should be more restrictive than the Watershed standard for one acre <br />of disCUrbed area. <br />Allan suggested that the City address disturbance in the category of 20,000 <br />square feet to one acre. The City Engineer felt regulating this category <br />would apply to many individual commercial/industrial properties. He <br />pointed out the difficulty of compliance for lots in Ryan Industrial Park <br />given the fact that soils in This area do not infiltrate water. The Engineer <br />noted that the risk is that properties would not redevelop or make <br />improvements if the standards are too restrictive. <br />Barraclough asked if it would be better to apply the Watershed or the <br />NEMO standards in Ryan Industrial Park. The City Engineer did not feel <br />volume reduction standards could be met in Ryan Industrial Park given the <br />soils will not infiltrate water. Keis asked if soil types could be a <br />consideration in applying the standards. The City Engineer indicated that <br />the Watershed rules to that given the payment to the impact fund if their <br />standards cannot be met. <br />Duray asked for an example of what the cost would be in applying either <br />standard to a 30,000 square foot lot in Ryan Industrial Park. The City <br />Engineer did not have an estimate. He also noted that the $20,000 cap on <br />the payment to the Watershed's stormwater impact fund is per acre and <br />only on linear projects. A rectangular project would pay a higher fine. <br />Blesener stated that these regulations will make redevelopment much <br />more difficult. Allan noted Chat most of Ryan Industrial Park is <br />impervious surface. Keis pointed out Chat most commercial development <br />is. Allan felt that there must be a compromise between protecting the <br />environment and encouraging redevelopment. Keis noted that residential <br />properties are much easier to apply the standards to given there is a great <br />deal less impervious surface. <br />McGraw asked if the same standard had to apply to all properties. He <br />suggested that natural condiCions be taken into account when applying the <br />stormwater regulations. The City Engineer stated that the City could have <br />different standards based on soil condiCions, for example. <br />Keis pointed out a site such as Brady's ChaC was virtually all blacktop. The <br />Engineer noted that stormwater could be managed on this site through an <br />underground system. Allan noted that some of the blacktop could be <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.