Laserfiche WebLink
-2- <br />2. A paid coach wooed be coveted by the City os L.ittte Canada, whether a <br />dot am saeamy an not uxw paid. He would .then become an employee and <br />he wooed .then be subject to the emptoyet- employee nelation6hip, whether <br />donated on not. Theme would de6inetety be coverage. <br />3. A paid .irw.t'utcton would automatically be coveted on the basis o6 an <br />employee. <br />4. 16 a child -L6 intuited otter neg.i,a.tvr ing and signing the waiver Sonm <br />and ij..thece .t6 negligence on the pant as any o6 the .inst'ui tomb, the <br />L.C.R.A. would de6.i.netety be neapon6.ible Son that .injury and I woui'rd <br />say the City a6 Little Canada would also be liable and the ctuotent <br />.i.n6wcance pnognam o6 the City os Little Canada would pnatect the City <br />only - not the L.C.R.A. <br />5. A membert o6 the L.C.R.A. who .1.6 intuited during a Sund malting activity <br />on City pnopenty would not be covviced".Ln any way under wonken6 compensation <br />on tiabLt ty. However, .i6 .thvice ctu.6 negligence on the pant o6 the City <br />because o6 the pnopenty, .theme would be protectian,San.that member. <br />6. This would appty the same as #5. <br />7. Th s' would apply the same as #5. <br />16 a paint -time employee 1.6 intuited maintaining anyYostie Sac.ilities, <br />whe.then City owned on no.t, the employee would be covered under wonkvc6 <br />compensation and be et g.ibte-Son the 6ufl bene6its.<; <br />9. A outi.tomen on pamti.cipant that is intuited dulling a Sund na.is.ing pnognam <br />on City property wooed not be coveted. under. wonkec4 compensation a.nd . <br />not coveted under the liab.iti ty. However,; .the City would be pnatected , <br /><i6 the pennon were intuited .through some negtigence;a5 .the City a6 to the <br />pnopenty. In no cincumstance6 would they be. p rotected cuidvc the iuonken6 <br />compensation. <br />10. This ,would appty the same as <br />Now an the second page o6youn t'ettenn <br />.hvee questions; <br />1. 15 .the above situations'aren'. covered by`aun policy, whatis the.bes.t <br />way to assure coverage. ` The best cozy to procure coverage is 6on'L`C R A <br />to pumchase their. own .i.nswaance policy and Snom'wha.'1 can deteun.ine, based < <br />on the activities o6 alt the programs, ehe cost . would. be $2,163.00,p4 <br />yeah bon tiab.itity and the uwnket6 compenaatcon.watilti be based,'°os cnwcs4 ., <br />on the payroll and 1 wowed assume /because 06 alt. th.e' donated "and .votunte x <br />tabors, a workers compensation policy could cost anywhere 6nom $150.00 pea? <br />yeah to as much as $1,000.00 pen year <br />