My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-27-1982 Additions
>
City Council Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1982
>
01-27-1982 Additions
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/21/2013 2:29:57 PM
Creation date
5/21/2013 2:28:09 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
66
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
It should be noted that although streamlining the review <br />process is an objective in the Development Framework, <br />Shoreview is one of the few communities to seriously look at <br />this issue and actually develop a specific method to address <br />it. <br />d. Policy Areas <br />The Development Framework designates Shoreview as part of the <br />Area of Planned Urbanization. This area, which is within <br />the Metropolitan Urban Service Area, is where most of the <br />growth in the region between now and 1990 is expected to <br />occur. As a result, the Council expects urbanizing <br />communities not only to accommodate their share of <br />metropolitan growth, but to do so in a manner that provides <br />for efficient, orderly and economic use of metropolitan <br />systems. In addition, Council policy provides that <br />development should be compatible with natural resources and <br />provide for a variety of housing types and costs convenient <br />to shopping, jobs and transportation systems. The Shoreview <br />plan which promotes continued residential development in a <br />variety of types and cost ranges, protection of the city's <br />natural resources, and expansion of employment and shopping <br />opportunities clearly supports these Council policies. <br />2. Investment Framework (Norm Werner) <br />The Shoreview plan includes a capital improvement program (CIP) <br />and policies implementing the capital improvement program. Two <br />policies are especially pertinent to these times. <br />1. No capital improvement project will be funded until it has <br />been demonstrated that there will be adequate future funds to <br />operate and maintain it. <br />2. Reinvestment for replacement, maintenance or increased <br />efficiency of existing public facilities will be made before <br />investments are made for the expansion of existing facilities <br />or the provision of new facilities. <br />The CIP contains projects for each year from 1982 to 1986 <br />totaling $8,958,850. The information provided includes itemized <br />projects, timing, estimated cost and financial sources. A system <br />for establishing priorities takes into consideration the <br />geographic area of the city to be improved, need , life <br />expectancy and financial impact. No dollar amounts are shown to <br />illustrate the financial impact. <br />A financial section in the comprehensive plan discusses property <br />tax valuation for the years 1969 to 1979, mill rates, muncipal <br />expenditures by functions, and a table of industrial development <br />revenue bonds that are outstanding in the name of the city. A <br />table of annual debt service payments is shown (by types of debt) <br />for the years from 1981 until the bonds are retired in 2005. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.