My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-27-1982 Additions
>
City Council Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1982
>
01-27-1982 Additions
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/21/2013 2:29:57 PM
Creation date
5/21/2013 2:28:09 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
66
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
solely attributed to the difference between the actual 1980 <br />are <br />population bt1, cpersonsand <br />low. For forecasts <br />householdfor <br />foreca0sts about half <br />about ffere persons Council 1980 forecasts being <br />use of housing units rather than households <br />the difference erence is justified by also results in its <br />low. The city's With <br />forecast <br />(which bs not severalehundredtunits higher. fort being is only <br />adjustments made for these factors the difference between <br />Council forecasts and Shoreview forecasts for 1990 0 forecast <br />growth somewhat above Council forecasts, the higher about 500 units. This is not a major difference. <br />of Shoreview is reasonable. <br />COMPARISON OF DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK AND SHOREVIFEoW e <br />Forecasts <br />Current 1980 1990 2000 <br />stimat e 1980 <br />16,300 21,600 <br />5,500 700 9,400 <br />5,000 8,000 10,000 <br />Develo ment Framework <br />17,262 (Census) <br />Population 5,985 <br />Households 6,114 <br />Housing Units 3,336 <br />Employment <br />Shoreview <br />Population <br />Housing Unit <br />6,029 <br />22,231 27,038 <br />9,100 11,537 <br />s appear to be <br />The what hight aced on 1980 80 employ entlestimatesofor in <br />Shoreview. . high based compensate for greater <br />housing than forecast. <br />b. Lan se Act, <br />and planned land uses <br />Consistent with the requirements of the Land and extant of <br />the location, intensity agricul- <br />tural has identified both existing tips of ag <br />all use city, giving <br />all uses specified in the law with the exception city has <br />tural use which does not exist in Shoreview' figures used to <br />also <br />tw projected and 1t 0• acres <br />Fs used t <br />compute regi nal lan0. <br />crmpece degional land demand for the Development the be <br />to that <br />ate developmentdintShore9iewaduring the s needed <br />to accommodate <br />period. <br />c. lm lementation <br />The Act requires that cities prepare <br />cs. To this <br />imp Land Planning rated Development <br />end, Shoreview pos tona adopt anInteg their plans. <br />end, <br />Shoreview proposes to eop Zoning and P <br />Ordinance which combines the existing tent <br />deves. entsrevordinance <br />process intended <br />update varioustdevelop <br />development <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.