My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-22-1983 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1983
>
11-22-1983 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/24/2013 8:49:38 AM
Creation date
5/24/2013 8:47:46 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
70
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />Planning Commission <br />Nov. 3, 1983 <br />Johnson <br />PUD (Cont.) <br />Mr. Grittman replied that the uses would have to remain the same. <br />Mr. Costa pointed out that the Council will probably be concerned <br />that there is not enough room for emergency vehicles to get back <br />to the warehouse. <br />Mr. Grittman pointed out that this is the first time he has had accurate <br />measurements. Grittman informed the commission that he would be <br />reviewing the plan and will be coming back with specific recommendations. <br />Mrs. Timmons stated that she would vote against any approval of the <br />concept as the Commission did not have adequate information to <br />prepare for the meeting. Timmons stressed that this was not the <br />fault of Mr. Johnson. <br />Mrs. Kingsbury stated that she would vote for the concept for the <br />same reasons Mrs. Timmons was voting against because it was not <br />Mr. Johnson's fault that the commission did not receive the necessary <br />information. <br />Mr. DeLonais recommended approval of the concept of the Johnson <br />PUD subject to the recommendations of the Planner contained in <br />his report of October 27, 1983 and any other recommendations that <br />may be forthcoming. <br />Motion seconded by Mr. French. <br />Motion carried 5 - 1. Mrs. Timmons voting against. <br />Text The Planning Commission pointed out that it did not receive a copy <br />Amendment of the proposed text amendment which would allow a garment apparel <br />For Printing screen printing business in a B -3 area as a conditional use permit. <br />Business <br />Mr. Grittman informed the Commission that two gentlemen would like <br />to start a screen printing business on the sothwest portion of Viking <br />Drive east of Rice Street. This is a B -3 zone and under the ordinance <br />this type of business would only be allowed in a BW area. However, <br />it is the feeling of the Planner that this type of business is <br />compatible with a B -3 zone. Also, under a conditional use permit <br />the City would have control. <br />It was the feeling of the Planning Commission that this matter should <br />be tabled as the Commission did not receive a copy of the proposed <br />amendment. <br />Mrs. Kingsbury recommended tabling of the text amendment due to <br />the lack of information on the part of the Planning Commission. <br />Motion seconded by Mrs. Timmons. <br />Page -4- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.