Laserfiche WebLink
Joe Chlebeck <br />September 23, 1983 <br />Page 3 <br />We also compared actual transactions for 1982 with the projected transactions <br />for the remaining bond issues. The 1971, 1973 and 1976 Bond Funds were all <br />ahead of projections at December 31, 1982. However, these improvements are <br />nominal in relationship to these bonds and their remaining terms. The two 1978 <br />Bond Funds reflect a $34,000 improvement over the projected amounts as follows: <br />1. City collection of special deferred assessments <br />(i.e. no scheduled collection terms) <br />2. Interest earnings above a 7% yield <br />3. Tax collections below 95% <br />4. Assessment collections below 95% <br />5. Penalities and interest on delinquencies <br />6. Other - net <br />$ 1,500 <br />32,900 <br />(1,700) <br />(900) <br />2,600 <br />(400) <br />Total $ 34,000 <br />The above improvement (which is also an actual improvement as apposed to a pro- <br />jected improvement) means that the City can reduce further the scheduled tax <br />levies for the 1978 Bond Issues. Accordingly, Proposed #2 reflects an addi- <br />tional decrease totalling $29,900 for these Bond Issues. <br />We have also eliminated the $11,000 1983/1984 tax levy for the 1973 Building <br />Bonds. This bond issue will be fully retired in 1984. Existing cash assets <br />plus the collectible 1983 tax levy will be more than sufficient to meet the debt <br />obligations for this bond issue. <br />The total result of the above is a $69,962 decrease in proposed tax levies for <br />debt purposes. The City Council should be made aware that Proposed #2 is a <br />reversal of past City policy. For the first time in recent history, the City <br />will be reducing debt levies. I feel comfortable in making this recommendation <br />due mainly to the additional information provided by the Debt Study and expect <br />to use such data in computing future proposed tax levies. <br />The General Fund tax levy is being proposed at the maximum allowed state level. <br />The financial position of the General Fund (especially after the effects <br />of funding the Senior Citizen's Project) requires that this levy be maximized. <br />The City used $70,000 ($45,000 - 1983 Budgeted Reserve plus $25,000 Past Reserve <br />Balance) from the General Fund to finance one -half of the Senior Citizen's <br />Project. Accordingly, the 1984 operating budget should include a provision to <br />increase the General Fund Reserve Balance by a minimum of $70,000 to $100,000. <br />Exhibit B details the City's General - Purpose Revenue Base for the years 1979 <br />through 1984 Proposed #2. This Exhibit clearly shows two important items: <br />1. State Financing (local government aid) decreased from 51% of this base <br />in 1979 to 24% in 1984. Alternatively, Local Financing (local tax levy <br />increased from 49% to 76% over the same period. This is the "shift" we <br />have been projecting for the past three years. <br />003 <br />