Laserfiche WebLink
1. An ordinance that is uniform throughout the cities <br />policed by the Sheriff's Office. <br />2. An ordinance that can be enforced, understood and <br />administered with the least amount of difficulty. <br />3. An ordinance that will reduce the volume of false <br />alarms through some type of penalty. <br />4. An ordinance that is not so restrictive or expensive <br />for the user as to discourage the use of alarms. <br />In March 1983, the city of Falcon Heights passed an alarm ordinance which <br />I am enclosing. This ordinance is one that I feel we could live with. The <br />only change I would propose is a fifty dollar penalty for the third false <br />alarm in place of the twenty five dollar one used in Falcon Heights. <br />If this ordinance is not acceptable, my next recommendation is that a <br />committee be formed with representatives from the cities of Arden Hills, <br />Gem Lake, Little Canada, North Oaks, Shoreview and Vadnais Heights to <br />develope an ordinance. Also, representatives of alarm companies could <br />be included. <br />From the position of the Sheriff's Office, uniformity is very important. <br />To summarize, the false alarms are seriously affecting our operations. <br />It disrupts our radar efforts, it creates problems with the deployment <br />of our squads assigned patrol beats. The problem will continue to grow <br />as estimates from the Cable TV people indicate as many as 50 -70 percent <br />of the subscribers may install residential alarms. <br />At some point in the near future, additional manpower may be needed if <br />the present rate of false alarms continues. <br />Very truly, <br />Charles L. Zacharias, <br />Ramsey County Sheriff <br />by: <br />Fred R. Spencer, <br />Patrol Division Commander <br />page -38- <br />