07-13-1983 Council Agenda - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

City of Little Canada Page 2 3. In a warranty deed dated October 25, 1939 and filed October 31, 1939, certain residential covenants and restrictions were placed upon the subject property. These covenants and restrictions do not appear to have any effect upon the subject property at this date because of Minnesota Title Standard No. 91A. 4. Property is subject to a Notice of Deferred Assessment dated September 15, 1980 and filed October 27, 1980 as Document No. 2094790, a copy of which is attached to this opinion as Exhibit "A" and by this reference is incorporated herein. On June 24, 1983, our office spoke with Joseph Chlebeck who informed us that the special assessments outstanding against this property have been paid in full. 5. The Abstract does not contain a current certification as to real estate taxes due and payable, however, our office has made an oral check with the Ramsey County Department of Property Taxation. That office informs us that there are delinquent taxes due and payable on the subject property for 1982, and that no tax payments have been made in the year 1983. This opinion is limited to the matters shown by said Abstract. All matters not so shown are excepted from this opinion and include: (a) rights of any parties in possession; (b) possibility of liens from improvements in process or completed on the premises or property connected therewith within the last ninety (90) days; (c) general zoning and building laws and restrictions; (d) matters which an accurate survey of the premises would disclose; (e) security interest in crops or fixtures under Chapter 336, Minnesota Statutes; (f) assessments for municipal improvements certified only in the office of the Clerk of the municipality in which said property is located. With respect to (a) above, we suggest that you satisfy yourself that no one is in possession of the premises other than the above -named fee owner, or if anyone else is in possession, that they do not claim any title or interest in the premises. With respect to (b) above, we further suggest that you satisfy yourself by a visual inspection of the premises that there have been no improvements in process or completed on the premises or property connected therewith within the last ninety (90) days, or if there have been such improvements, inquiry should be made to determine that said improvements have been paid in full. With respect to (f) above, we would suggest that certificates be obtained from the Clerk of the municipality as to levied and pending special assessments. GFB:slc Attachment Very truly yours, SW yEY, O'CON i & LeMAY Ge rg P. Borer 3 1