My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-26-1983 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1983
>
01-26-1983 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2013 1:50:44 PM
Creation date
6/10/2013 1:47:32 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
87
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
II`U JT!S <br />'tanning <br />:ommi s sion <br />Lin. 5, 1843 <br />:ary Smith <br />'ariance <br />Cont.) <br />Ir. DeLonais asked how the property would be protected in case of a <br />Eire. Mr. Fasciana replied that it would he protected as well as <br />the Caplette's property. <br />The Planner stated that in the past the City Council stated that the <br />property could not be developed until there was a road to the property. <br />Mr. Smith Informed the Commission that he would like to build on the <br />property. Mr. Smith also reported that he will have to run his own <br />sewer line to the property at a substantial cost. Smith also reported <br />that there are currently three families living in the Captette house <br />and a day care center is being operated in this house. These famtLies <br />all use the driveway as their =.ccesr. <br />'ors. Timmons asked what kind of gentleman's agreement there is for <br />maintaining the road and asked Mr. Smith how he felt about this. <br />Ctrs. Timmons asked Mr. Smith if he wanted the City to require a <br />road. <br />The Planner again pointed out that the City Council has stated <br />that before the lots in the area are developedsthere should be a <br />road and sewer. <br />Mr. Smith pointed out that there is the 15 foot easement going to <br />the property. Smith asked why he cannot use this for his driveway. <br />The Planner stated that the property is a landlocked parcel and does <br />not have adequate frontage on a public street. <br />`Ir. LeMay asked if a similar situation was not recently denied for <br />`(r. Chris Drake. <br />The Planner stated that the lot does not conform to City Code. <br />It's. Timmons commented that according to she Code a variance could <br />he ;ranted. 'Ir. Fasciana commented that he is requesting such a <br />variance. <br />"rs. immons stated that she Felt the road was needed, but that it <br />was not the pro5tem of this lot. Timmons pointed out that there <br />a 30 Foot driveway easement. <br />The "linner Stated that if the variance i.5 ; ranted tt should provide <br />t'iat the nocessary nronerty is dedicated for a public street .and that <br />the City may assess this property at the time that the sewer line is <br />installed. <br />'tr. Smith notnted out that when the other lots in the area develop, <br />there will he additional neopte to pick up the assessments. <br />Page -7- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.