My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-26-1983 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1983
>
01-26-1983 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2013 1:50:44 PM
Creation date
6/10/2013 1:47:32 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
87
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Little Canada Planning Commission, <br />Mayor and City Council <br />4 January 1983 <br />Page Two <br />If a public street is to be required, the applicant has requested that the City <br />construct the street and sewer improvements. This then becomes a question of <br />how the improvements are to be assessed. Obviously property other than that <br />which is owned by the applicant will benefit from the road. In addition to <br />future development for Lot C, Lots A and B currently use the existing 30 foot <br />strip to access North Owasso Boulevard due to steep topography on the north <br />sides of those lots. <br />RECOMMENDATION <br />The area in question is a good example of past piecemeal development. From a <br />planning perspective, construction of road and sewer improvements must be required <br />prior to further development in the area. The City must decide whether to <br />install the improvements and assess benefitting properties, require the applicant <br />to install the improvements, or require that all adjoining property owners work <br />together to resolve the access and sewer issues. Based upon past experience, <br />either of the last two alternatives could effectively preclude the applicant <br />from building on the property. <br />If the access issue can be resolved, our office will submit a follow -up report <br />relative to the development of the lot in question, as well as design considera- <br />tions for the road. <br />cc: Joe Chlebeck <br />Tom Sweeney <br />Don Carley <br />Ed Locke <br />Gary Smith <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.