Laserfiche WebLink
With alternative #2, two possible plans for redevelopment have <br />emerged. These two ideas are shown in Exhibit G. Alternative 2A <br />is the larger of the plans as it includes the four single family <br />home sites which front Country Drive near the water works right - <br />of -way. This plan will allow for a more level new Country Drive <br />grade as regrading could start near the water works right -of -way. <br />It would appear that, if this plan is constructed, a nearly <br />constant street grade for Country Drive could be achieved from <br />the apartment complex on the north to the area of reconstruction <br />recently completed by the State. This in turn could provide <br />excellent site visibility for most of properties fronting L -35E <br />from the water works right -of -way to the Quebec Apartments. The <br />cross section along Country Drive is shown in Exhibit H. <br />Alternative 2B is smaller in area to Alternative 2A but very <br />similar in concept. This plan does not include the <br />aforementioned four home sites as these might prove difficult to <br />acquire. As in Plan 2A, Burke Lane is proposed to be extended <br />east to Country Drive on the north side of the existing homes. <br />This alternative suggests that regrading start along this <br />alignment and then proceed to the north, leaving all of the <br />single family homes on it's south side as is. <br />This alternative does not allow, however, as constant of a grade <br />for Country Drive as the single family homes, if they are to <br />remain, dictate a higher elevation for the Burke Lane /Country <br />Drive interchange. From this interchange, new Country Drive could <br />be sloped downwards to achieve the intended elevation north of <br />Burke Lake. The redevelopment site adjoining Burke Lane to the <br />north will have less freeway visibility as Country Drive will <br />not, as noted earlier, begin its descent until north of the <br />single family homes. This in turn will affect the visibility of <br />this area from I -35E. <br />Based on the analysis of these two alternatives, our office <br />recommends further study of Alternative 2A for redevelopment in <br />this area. This is because, in part, the four single family <br />home sites are zoned B -3, the separation that the water works <br />right -of -way provides and the opportunity to reconstruct Country <br />Drive beginning where the State finished their recent street <br />work. This plan also allows for the construction of Country <br />Drive at a more constant, straight grade and will obviously help <br />to facilitate redevelopment of the southern most single family <br />home sites. <br />Tax Increment Uses. Tax increment financing has been mentioned <br />as a possibility for implementing redevelopment in this area of <br />Little Canada. The preliminary report prepared by Business <br />Development Services (BDS) indicated that the use of tax <br />increment financing for redevelopment in this location was <br />potentially feasible. The question then arises regarding the <br />possible uses for tax increment proceeds for such a project. <br />Besides using the money for street and utility improvements, a <br />number of other potential uses for the proceeds exist. These <br />Page 31 <br />