Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />City Council <br />Jan. 27, 1988 <br />Bank Shot <br />Billiards <br />(Cont.) <br />Mr. Fahey introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION NO. 88 -1 -27 - AMENDING RESOLUTION <br />NO. 87 -12 -582 APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE <br />PERMIT FOR BANK SHOT BILLIARDS, DECLARING <br />APPROVAL SUBJECT TO THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF <br />THE CITY PLANNER AS CONTAINED IN HIS REPORT DATED <br />DECEMBER 3, 1987 WITH THE EXCEPTION THAT THE MAXIMUM <br />AMOUNT OF AMUSEMENT DEVICES IS LIMITED TO FOUR AND <br />THAT CLOSING TIME IS SET AT 2 A.M., WITH THESE <br />CHANGES BEING MADE DUE TO THE APPLICANT'S INTEREST <br />IN COOPERATING WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE <br />PLANNING COMMISSION AND SUBJECT TO A REVIEW AT 120 <br />DAYS FROM THE DATE OF OPENING OF THE BUSINESS, <br />WITH CONSIDERATION TO BE GIVEN TO INCREASING THE <br />HOURS OF OPERATION AND NUMBER OF AMUSEMENT DEVICES <br />ALLOWED AT THAT TIME <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Mr. Blesener. <br />Ayes (5) Fahey, Blesener, Scalze, Collova, LaValle. <br />Nays (0). <br />Resolution declared adopted. <br />This resolution appears in Resolution Book No. 19, Pages 28 and 29. <br />Planning Fahey reported that the Planning Commission has asked for clarification <br />Commission of the Council's ability to overrule a Planning Commission recommendation <br />Concerns without referring the matter back to the Commission. <br />Agenda Fahey pointed out that occasionally the Council does disagree with a <br />Addition recommendation of the Planning Commission, but that in such instances <br />the Council is not required to send the matter back to the Planning <br />Commission unless for some reason the Ordinance requires an amendment <br />or the matter requires further study. <br />Scalze reported that she appreciates the amount of time the Planning <br />Commission spends discussing various issues and this discussion as <br />contained in their meeting minutes decreases the amount of time the <br />Council has to spend reviewing a proposal or issue. <br />Collova pointed out that when a matter is tabled by the Planning Commission <br />the Council cannot review that matter for 60 days or until the Council <br />receives a recommendation from the Planning Commission, whichever is <br />sooner. <br />Blesener stated that if it were required that both the Planning <br />Commission and the City Council had to completely agree on an issue <br />or development proposal, there are some items that would never be <br />resolved. <br />Page 19 <br />