Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />Planning Commission <br />June 9, 1988 <br />Boosalis The Planner stated that the issue of land use and assessments will be <br />Proposal resolved prior to the assessment hearing. <br />(Cont.) <br />Herkenhoff asked if County Road C property owners were in favor of the <br />proposal. <br />One property owner stated that she owned a B -3 lot and had no intention <br />of dividing her property. <br />DeLonais stated that he was not in favor of forcing development onto anyone. <br />DeLonais stated that he believed the City and developer should put in the <br />road. However, DeLonais felt that if the property owners divided their <br />land sometime in the future, then they would pay for their share of the <br />road cost. <br />Boosalis stated that the assessment issue is not what requires action this <br />evening, but rather the rezoning issue and the concept of the development. <br />Herkenhoff pointed out that the Iona Lane people have been guaranteed that <br />the area would be developed as R -1 and questioned the ability to come up <br />with a better proposal than the one before the Commission this evening. <br />DeLonais pointed out that the Commission previously denied the Boosalis <br />CUP and asked why the Council acted on the CUP without further review <br />by the Commission. <br />The City Planner explained that if the Commission had tabled action, the <br />Council could not have acted on the proposal for 60 days without a <br />recommendation of the Commission. However, the Commission made a <br />recommendation to deny, which the Council overturned after many meetings <br />and compromises that were reached with the developer. <br />Mr. DeLonais recommended approval of the concept of the Boosalis residential <br />development with the condition that the road improvement be financed by the <br />developer and the City and that no burden for this improvement be placed <br />on the property owners, and subject to final plat being presented to the <br />Planning Commission for review and action. <br />Motion seconded by Herkenhoff. <br />Motion carried 5 - 0. <br />Herkenhoff recommended approval of the rezoning of the north 133.33 feet <br />of 89 County Road C from B -3 to R -1 as per the request of Mr. Nick Boosalis. <br />Motion seconded by Mr. DeLonais. <br />Motion carried 5 - 0. <br />Page 11 <br />