My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-27-1984 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1984
>
06-27-1984 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/24/2013 3:12:20 PM
Creation date
6/24/2013 3:10:40 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />Planning Commission <br />June 14, 1884 <br />Lee Rezoning <br />(Cont.) <br />Richards <br />Request <br />Palmen <br />Request <br />Mr. DeLonais did not feel the Commission should act on the request <br />if Mr. Lee does not appear at the meeting. <br />A Burke Lane resident stated that they like their area and feel it <br />is unique. It was commented that the balance between the commercial <br />and residential property is out -of -line. <br />Mr. Pat Conway pointed out that the Conduit people would just as <br />soon stay residential and would like the Lee property to remain <br />residential. Conway felt there should be no question about leaving <br />the property residential. <br />Mrs. Timmons pointed out the great impact the Lee rezoning request <br />could have on the Burke Lane neighborhood and stated that legally <br />the City would not have had to notify these people of the rezoning. <br />Timmons suggested that Council agendas be published so that people <br />know about things before they are acted upon. <br />Mr. Herkenhoff recommended that in view of the concerns of the <br />residents of the area and the absence of Larry Lee or his representative <br />that the area remain zoned R -1. <br />Motion seconded by Mr. French. <br />Motion carried 8 - 0. <br />Mrs. Zoch asked if the land across the street from her home could <br />he rezoned residential. Mr. Costa informed Mrs. Zoch that the property <br />owners would have to come in and request a rezoning. Costa suggested <br />that Mrs. Zoch could contact the Code Enforcement Officerabout getting <br />the property cleaned up. Costa felt that the property owner has <br />probably overstepped his bounds with the amount of cars that are <br />parked on the property. <br />Mr. Herkenhoff felt that the concerns of the Burke Lake residents are <br />very real. <br />The Planner reported that the Richard request is withdrawn as sufficient <br />information was not submitted. <br />The Planner reported that Mr. Palmen is not present. Palmen is a <br />landscaping contractor that is parking vehicles on his property and <br />various equipment. Also a garage has been moved on the property from <br />Maplewood. <br />Mr. Palmen is applying for a PUD to allow for this equipment. The <br />only other alternative is to remove the equipment. Mr. Palmen has <br />not yet made application for the PUD. <br />Page -4- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.