My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-25-1984 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1984
>
07-25-1984 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/24/2013 3:17:11 PM
Creation date
6/24/2013 3:15:06 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
105
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />Planning Commission <br />July 12, 1984 <br />Parks (Cont.) Mrs. Timmons commented that the Parks Commission does the work <br />in this area. Timmons also pointed out that the City does not <br />own any park land. <br />Council <br />Agendas <br />Richards <br />Matter <br />Mr. DeLonais asked if anyone has approached the School District <br />about Spooner Park. Mrs. Kingsbury replied that the School District <br />has been approached and they refused to sell the park. <br />Mr. DeLonais stated that the City should not be in the business of <br />promoting ball tournaments for outsiders. DeLonais was also <br />concerned about taking a lot of property off the tax rolls. <br />Mrs. Timmons commented that there are a lot of children who need <br />parks and that the City must maintain a standard of living for its <br />residents. <br />The Planner also pointed out that park land would be purchased from <br />park charges that the City collects. <br />Mrs. Timmons pointed out that the Park Commission has a member of <br />the Council at its meetings and felt that the Planning Commission <br />should have Council representation. <br />Mrs. Kingsbury requested that the Planning Commission members <br />receive a copy of the Park Commission minutes. <br />Mrs. Kingsbury commented that the Planning Commission received copies <br />of Council agendas for a very short time and then this was discontinued. <br />Kingsbury requested that this be done on a regular basis. <br />Mrs. Timmons expressed concern that Mr. Richards was issued a <br />building permit for his pool and fence and then after it was <br />installed, Mr. Richards was told that the pool is not within <br />setbacks. Timmons felt that the location of the pool should <br />have been known to the City before the pool went in and the <br />Building Inspector would have discovered the problem before the <br />pool was completed. <br />Palmen PUD The Planner reported that the Palmen PUD request is withdrawn at <br />this time, but Mr. Palmen is working on another proposal. <br />Page —10— <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.