03-09-06 Planning Comm. Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 9, 2006 Motion seconded by Duray. Motion carried 4 - 2. Barraclough and Socha voted against. Barraclough and Socha stated that they opposed the Text Amendment as they felt it should not be limited to residential properties that abut a busy street. They noted that should a property owner not have the ability to put in a T turnaround or full circle, then the CUP option for a second driveway access should be available to that property owner. CUP FOR Mr. Mike Murphy, 601 County Road B-2 East, requested approval of a SECOND Conditional Use Permit allowing a second driveway access for his DRIVEWAY property. The City Planner noted that Mr. Murphy has submitted a ACCESS - landscape plan for the proposed horseshoe driveway, and that the T 601 COUNTY turnaround or full circle are not options given the proximity of the garage ROAD B-2 EAST - to the street and Che existence of a large tree thaC the Murphy's would like MURPHY to retain. Knudsen asked about the impact the horseshoe driveway would have on drainage. Murphy reported that given the premature start he had with the horseshoe driveway, the property has not been properly graded. Grading will slope the property toward the west, thus directing run-off properly. Duray recommended approval of a Conditional Use Permit allowing a second driveway access for 601 County Road B-2 East as proposed by Mike Murphy, subject to compliance with the conditions just discussed by the Commission, and subject to City staff reviewing the drainage for the property to ensure it is proper. Motion seconded by Rheaume. Motion carried 4 - 2. Barraclough and Socha voted against. PROPERTY Mr. Jeff Kissell, Kissell Construction, appeared before the Commission DIVISION - requesting approval of the division of 3007 Arcade Street into two single- 3007 ARCADE family lots. Kissell reported that the existing house will be torn down and STREET - two new houses built on the property. KISSELL CONSTRUCTION Duray asked if the tree line at the back of the property would be disturbed. Kissell was not sure at this point, but noted that the setbacks for the new homes would comply with the City's requirements.