01-25-1984 Council Agenda - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Little Canada Planning Commission 5 January 1984 Page Two 923.010.3. To allow variation from the provisions of this Ordinance including setbacks, height, lot area, width and depth, yards, etc. This procedure will provide for a zero lot line situation, in effect eliminat- ing the interior side yard setback. We believe that the proposal meets these goals. The City is in no way adversely impacted by the subdivision of this parcel. Densities, housing type, lot configuration, and the impacts on City provided services will all remain the same as they now exist. The following requirements are made of PUD proposals in Zoning Ordinance Section 923.020: A. Application must be made by the landowner. B. PUD must be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. C. PUD must be consistent with the City Sewer Plan. D. PUD must provide common open space. E. Maintenance of common open space must be provided for through City dedication or Property Owner's Association. F. Open space must be proportionately provided through all stages. G. Density must agree with Comprehensive Plan. H. All new utilities must be installed underground. I. Utility connections must be separately metered. J. New streets must conform to City standards. K. Landscaping must be provided. L. Development must occur at timing consistent with planned City service extensions. M. Regulates condominium type development. N. Waives all interior setback lines. The Buechler proposal meets all of the requirements of this section which are applicable with the exception of subsection D. requiring the provision of common open space. We do not feel this proposal should be held to this pro- vision since each unit will have substantial private open space. This restric- tion is generally included because PUD units often lack private open space. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the conditional use permit for a planned unit develop- ment and subdivision be approved. It should be noted, however, that this memorandum has been written without the benefit of site plans of the subject property, and thus our recommendation is understood to be contingent upon the sufficient and appropriate submissions by the applicant. The applicant has indicated that such plans shall be available before the Planning Commission's regular meeting of 12 January 1984. This office will supply the Commissioners with copies of these plans at the meeting. 10