My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-22-1989 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1989
>
02-22-1989 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/26/2013 11:38:34 AM
Creation date
6/26/2013 11:37:11 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />Planning Commission <br />February 9, 1989 <br />Commission approved the R &S final plat. <br />Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />Motion adopted. <br />Brink Applicant Sanford Brink was not present. <br />Subdivision <br />The Planner recommended that the subdivision plan be <br />approved with a condition that they provide the Commission <br />with Planning and Future Development of Property to the <br />south. <br />Upon motion by DeLonais, seconded by Herkenhoff, the <br />Commission tabled the matter because of insufficient <br />information. <br />Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />Motion adopted. <br />Liebel Delonais questioned why it has been so long for the final <br />Final Plat plat. <br />Joe Chlebeck said it is because the man is doing it by <br />himself. <br />Upon motion by DeLonais, seconded by Davison, the <br />Commission approved the Liebel final plat. <br />Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />Motion adopted. <br />Section 6 The Planner said that at the last meeting the issue was <br />PUD Matter misunderstanding of our standards. Mr. DeBace wrote a note <br />to the Council and Mayor showing their interpretation of Il <br />zoning. <br />DeLonais stated that the City is not going to force them to <br />build up to IP standards, but they can still build to 11 <br />standards. Possibly a better grade of metal. <br />The Planner said that maybe brick on the roadside. <br />Basically, by going to PUD, site plans all go through the <br />Council. Storage areas are controlled. If I1, they can go <br />ahead and build and it might be sub - standard by one year <br />from now. The recommendation is that the Commission pass <br />PUD zoning in Section 5 areas. The hope of PUD being that <br />as development property comes in they will be able to <br />evaluate it on a case by case basis. The intent of PUD is <br />for higher design quality. Nothing is approved without the <br />Council. The City, in allowing a metal building may <br />Page 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.