01-25-1989 Council Agenda - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES Planning Commission January 12, 1989 Mr. Herkenhoff recommended that the Frank Frattalone property rezoning request be approved with the south 253 feet along South Owasso Blvd. (or approximately one acre) to remain zoned I -P and the remainder of the Frattalone property to be rezoned I -1 due to the past history of the rezoning of this property. Motion seconded by Schweizer. Motion carried 7 - 0. Section 6 The City Planner presented the Commission with a map detailing the PUD rezonings which the City Council enacted in October of 1988. The Planner pointed out that the area shown as PUD was originally proposed to be rezoned to I -P. Due to soil concerns in this area, the Council is now proposing that this section be rezoned from I -1 to PUD. The Planner pointed out that there are some vacant parcels in this area, but the majority are developed, although these businesses have room for expansion. The Planner pointed out that under the proposed PUD zoning, the City can allow any use allowed by the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan recommends that this area be developed as industrial. The Planner reported that the purpose of the PUD zoning is to try to get high - quality site design, although the property probably cannot accommodate the site design required by the I -P District. The Planner stated that under the PUD District, the Council would begin with the standards of the I -1 District and upgrade from there. Under the PUD the Council could consider each parcel on an individual basis according to the soil conditions of the individual parcels. The Planner stated that under the I -P District property owners with metal buildings would he allowed to expand their metal buildings by 25 %, however, Green space must also be increased. Outdoor storage is limited to 75% of the building size. Therefore, under these restrictions, some businesses would not be able to expand. Costa asked the effect of the rezoning to PUD on the landscaping business in this area. The Planner pointed out that the rezoning will not effect the use since existing conditions would be arandfathered in as non - conforming. Under the PUD there are no specific performance standards, and all uses would be by conditional use permit. All development proposals would require Planning Commission review and Council approval. Jack Peterson, Peterson Maintenance, stated that he was opposed to the rezoning. Peterson reported that he purchased his property because it was zoned I -1, and was concerned in the future with resale value should he chose to sell his property. Page -3-