01-25-1989 Council Agenda - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES Planning Commission January 12, 1989 on his site because of the I -1 zoning. Frattalone reported that he was forced out of his previous location because the zoning was improper. Frattalone reported that he has 238,000 square feet of property, of which 46,183 is in green area and he also has 11 acres of property in ponding at another location. Frattalone reported that he has .625 acres of property dedicated for street and boulevard on his parcel. Frattalone requested that approximately one acre, or a depth of 253 feet off South Owasso Blvd. remain I -P with the remainder of his property rezoned to I -1. Costa stated that he felt Mr. Frattalone was entitled to the rezoning that he is requesting. Davison asked if the rezoning is approved if specific reasons for the rezoning should be included in the resolution so that other property owners are aware of the circumstances and a precedent is not set. The Planner replied that this was correct. Peterson asked if the only difference between I -P and I -1 zones was the limitation on outdoor storage in the I -P District. The Planner replied that outdoor storage in the I -P District is limited to 75% of the size of the building, while in I -1 outdoor storage is unlimited. In addition, in the I -P District buildings are required to be masonry, while I -1 allows metal -clad structures. The Planner pointed out that when the Frattalone property was rezoned, it made Mr. Frattalone's outdoor storage non - conforming. That is the primary non - conformity of the site. Frattalone pointed out that outdoor storage is very important to his business, and while he may be grandfathered in, the building was constructed for other uses as well that require outdoor storage. Frattalone stated that he is concerned about the future when his building might be sold. Schweizer agreed that the rezoning took place very rapidly. Frattalone agreed, and commented that it is his feeling that City staff as well as the Council was not fully aware of the effects the rezoning would have. Frattalone stated that he would prefer that his entire piece be rezoned to I -1, but can understand the Council's concerns for getting upgraded development along South Owasso Blvd. Therefore, Frattalone is suggesting that the property along South Owasso Blvd. remain I -P, with the remainder to be rezoned to I -1. There was no one from the audience present wishing to comment on this matter. Page -2-