Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />PLANNING COMMISSION <br />September 14, 1989 <br />pointed out that a variance is necessary for lot area <br />since the two lots would be less than 10,000 square <br />feet in size. <br />Day reported that when the City put in the Sylvan <br />Street cul -de -sac, the City took some of his property <br />for the cul -de -sac. At that time, the City indicated <br />that should Mr. Day chose to subdivide his property in <br />the future, a variance would be granted for the <br />undersized lots. <br />The City Planner replied that this is correct, and <br />pointed out that a similar variance was granted for the <br />property on the other side of the cul -de -sac. <br />Therefore, the City Planner recommended approval. <br />Drabik asked if a park charge would be collected for <br />this subdivision. <br />The City Planner replied that a park charge will <br />probably be collected at the time building permits are <br />taken out for the lots. <br />Herkenhoff recommended approval of the Day subdivision <br />and variance request as submitted based on the <br />recommendation of the City Planner. <br />Motion seconded by Mr. Bendel. <br />Motion carried 7 - 0. <br />FENCING DeLonais asked if there was a maximum height allowed <br />REGULATIONS for a fence located in a front yard. <br />The City Planner replied that a front yard fence can be <br />a maximum of 4 feet in height. However, if the fence <br />is located within 30 feet of a corner, the maximum <br />height would then be 32 inches. <br />DeLonais pointed out that there is currently a fence <br />being constructed on a property on Little Canada Road <br />adjacent to the railroad tracks which he believes is in <br />violation of the Code. <br />The Commission requested that this situation be checked <br />into. <br />Page 11 <br />