My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-25-1989 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1989
>
10-25-1989 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/26/2013 2:11:31 PM
Creation date
6/26/2013 2:09:14 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• The resolution would grant "preliminary approval" to the <br />facility. Preliminary approval is a vague term, but is <br />typically applied to a project in a much more detailed stage <br />than is the current proposal. <br />• The resolution authorizes Miller and Schroeder to determine <br />who is necessary and appropriate to consult on the project. <br />Consultants to the City would typically have development <br />review fees passed through to the developer, however, no <br />development applicant or fees have been filed. <br />As Dan Wilson stated in a previous correspondence, we are <br />uncomfortable having a developer draw up a resolution for the <br />City's adoption in any case. If the Council is attracted to any <br />or all of the developer's proposals, this could be indicated to <br />them without a resolution. Such a proposal would require several <br />stages of review, including Planning Commission review for <br />rezoning, conditional use permit and site plan review, public <br />hearings and Council review and approval. <br />cc: Bob Voto <br />Dan Wilson <br />Tom Sweeney <br />Kathy Glanzer <br />Page 54 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.