Laserfiche WebLink
1vIINUTEs <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />,NNE 23, 2004 <br />to sort throush materials and clean up of that area first. Peterson indicated <br />that they are requesting an additional 60 days and would make every effort <br />to become compliant with the original site plan. Peterson reported that at <br />the last meeting with the Council they were caught off euard with how cut <br />and dried everything was. <br />LaValle pointed out that the Council has been dealing with this issue since <br />February of 2004. Petersen pointed out that they applied for an <br />Amendment to their Conditional Use Permit and the status of that <br />Amendment had been pending with the City. <br />Fahey noted that the amendment has been denied and Valor was informed <br />that they need to comply with the approved site plan for their property. <br />LaValle commented on the amount of staff time that has been necessary in <br />trying to get the Valor property compliant. Peterson indicated that they <br />had requested an Amendment to their CUP and that issue had been <br />pending. She indicated that Valor has been compliant on previous <br />inspections. The City Administrator disagreed. <br />Anderson asked if the City had the ability to grant a 60-day extension <br />subject to a per day fine for every day that compliance is not achieved <br />afrer the 60 days lapses. The City Attorney did not believe the Code <br />provided the Council with that authority. <br />Fahey expressed concern with granting extensions to property owners that <br />do not seem to be cooperating.- Peterson stated that it was her <br />understanding that other property owners have been granted extensions. <br />Fahey pointed out that Valor Enterprises must comply with the original <br />site plan. If a 60-day extension is granted and there is no compliance on <br />day 61, Faltey felt a citation should be issued. Fahey pointed out that there <br />was agreement on the part of Valor to comply with the original site plan. <br />Rather than comply, the condition of the property has gotten worse. Fahey <br />indicated that there should Have been compliance even during the time that <br />the request for an Amendment to the CUP was being processed. <br />Peterson indicated that she is requesting an additional 60 days to achieve <br />compliance. She indicated that she qtly wished that other progeny <br />owners were held to the same standards. <br />The City Administrator disagreed with Peterson's statement, and pointed <br />out that Valor was a new business that moved into the City under <br />established criteria. That criteria has not been complied with from the <br />outset. "phere are enforcement issues pending at some of the loner <br />established businesses that the (~itv is worl:ine with to resolve. <br />13 <br />