My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-24-1990 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1990
>
01-24-1990 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/10/2013 2:32:45 PM
Creation date
7/10/2013 2:30:51 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
108
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY OF NEW BRIGHTON, 803 - 5th AVENUE, N.W., NEW BRIGHTON, MINNESOTA 55112 • 633- <br />ew <br />righton <br />January 16, 1990 <br />Mr. Terry Schutten <br />Executive Director Ramsey County <br />286 Court House <br />15 West Kellogg Blvd. <br />Saint Paul, MN 55102 <br />Dear Mr. Schutten <br />Thank you for sharing a draft copy of your TIF Strategies report with <br />New Brighton. The report provides a wealth of information about TIF <br />activity in the County. It pulls together policy information into a <br />convenient resource document. TIF is a complicated system for economic <br />development, redevelopment, and providing housing in our community. <br />Because of that complexity, it merits monitoring and evaluation. The <br />results of TIF actions have an important effect on all the residents and <br />jurisdictions within Ramsey County. The report raised important <br />questions about the use of TIF. These include the degree of involvement <br />of the County government and school districts in TIF projects, the costs <br />involved in administration of TIF programs, and how to pay for them, the <br />need for greater and more effective communication between the agencies <br />creating TIF districts and the County, and how large a portion of a city's <br />or the County's tax base should be within a TIF district. These <br />questions deserve inter - agency /jurisdictional discussion. <br />Some aspects of the draft strategy are, however, troubling from a City <br />perspective. The report ignores the central goals behind the existence of <br />TIF and infers that all of the taxable value generated within TIF districts <br />would have occurred without the use of TIF. The proposed County TIF <br />objectives and recommended strategies amount to a prescription for <br />diminished economic growth and an end to revitalization of older areas of <br />the County. This is shortsighted public policy. <br />The objective of increased County involvement in TIF is desirable if it <br />means improved communication. The County would thereby take some <br />level of responsibility for the physical and economic development of the <br />County. This objective can be achieved now without any changes to the <br />already complicated TIF laws. Counties have the right to review and <br />comment on each TIF project, although it is not even done in a cursory <br />manner today. Communication from cities about overall development plans <br />and individual projects would be worthwhile and could be easily done. <br />The County's stated objectives of managing growth in the use of TIF and <br />limiting the impact of TIF on the County's tax base presumes use of TIF <br />Page 96 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.