02-28-1990 Council Agenda - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION February 8, 1990 Herkenhoff stated that once Rapid Oil Change is established, the business will come. Herkenhoff suggested that Rapid Oil make use of some temporary, portable signage in the meantime. Tim Townsley, Iona Lane resident, stated that he would prefer to see one pylon sign at the shopping center. Townsley stated that the shopping center blocks sunlight from his property, and existing signage from Rapid Oil Change shines light into his yard during the night. Townsley stated that he would rather see something done with the existing pylon at the site. Mr. DeLonais recommended that the Rice At C Center be limited to one pylon sign. Bendel pointed out that the ordinance entitles the shopping center to two pylons. The Planner replied that this was correct, the Code says that two pylons are allowed with special approval. The Planner pointed out that his recommendation was for two pylons at the shopping center and that both of these pylons be used for shopping center identification purposes. The Planner stated that his recommendation is that individual tenants should not have separate signage. Boosalis pointed out that the Code allows two pylons and he is asking for a third. The Planner stated that the Code says that two pylons are allowed for a shopping center by Conditional Use Permit, and that these two signs are to be used for shopping center identification purposes. Pedersen noted that Mr. DeLonais's motion died for lack of a second. Drabik recommended denial of the request for a third pylon sign at the Rice at C Center. The Planner reported that the City approved a site plan with two free - standing signs for the Rice at C Center, and it was his interpretation that under the PUD the City has approved two free - standing sign sites. Pedersen noted that Mrs. Drabik's motion died for lack of a second. Page 6