07-25-1990 Council Agenda - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION JULY 12, 1990 fencing must meet requirements for pools on public safety. Also, the City is imposing a double -fee on Poolside for their actions in constructing the display before appropriate permits had been obtained. Griebler stated that he would like to see the City require that the Poolside property be fenced with a six -foot fence. Griebler expressed concern about the condition of the property in the back and the lack of maintenance of this area by Poolside. Anderson replied that in the past some of his neighbors have opposed the fencing of the Poolside property. Drabik asked if the gazebo was constructed without a permit. The Planner replied that it was, however, the application before the Commission this evening would include the gazebo. The Planner also pointed out that the B -3 zoning of the property does not provide for outdoor storage and the materials should be stored inside. Anderson replied that Poolside is attempting to get rid of their storage. Griebler stated that the existing enclosure is too small for the amount of storage Poolside has. Griebler was also concerned that Poolside does not cut the grass in the back of their property and the dirt that was excavated for the pool is sitting in that area as well. Anderson replied that landscaping of the pool area had been slowed down because of recent rains. Drabik stated that the applicant should have been in for his permit before the pool was constructed. At that time she would have said no permit until the property is cleaned up. The Planner reported that the applicant can be required to post security for the clean up in an amount equal to the Building Inspector's estimate for cost of clean up. Anderson stated that he did not think he needed a permit to display a product that he sells. Mr. Herkenhoff recommended approval of the Conditional Use Permit for outdoor sales displays as requested by Poolside, 121 East County Road C, contingent upon Page 10