08-28-1991 Council Agenda - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION AUGUST 8, 1991 Pedersen indicated that no matter what is done to the structure, it will always look like a cabin. Pedersen asked if this is what the City wants for the area, or is the area in a transition mode. Garske suggested that if the structure is torn down it could become a weed patch. Garske stated that he had a problem with the front yard setback for the structure, and was concerned about the ability to park a car on the lot. Drabik suggested that the City require a landscape plan for the property that would show parking. Drabik also suggested a deadline be established for implementation of the landscape plan. Bendel felt aesthetics was an important issue, and felt that the City had the opportunity to make the property a little more appealing. McBride reported that the property owner would like to construct a garage on the property, but was informed that this could not be done. McBride pointed out that a garage would make the structure appear larger than it is. Pedersen stated that he would like to know the maximum. to which the structure can be expanded. Bendel suggested that McBride work with the Building Inspector,and City Planner on a landscape plan for the property. McBride reported that he would work with the City on a landscape plan, and would also like to submit a proposal for a garage. Garske pointed out the Commission's responsibility to protect the citizens -at- large. Garske was concerned that approval of the CUP and Variance might result in a structure that devalues the surrounding property values. Pedersen asked if the precast slabs will remain on the property. McBride replied that they will not. Herkenhoff recommended approval of the Conditional Use Permit to allow the improvement of a non - conforming single - family structure to bring the structure up to minimum standards, and a Variance to the Code to allow Page 6