04-10-1991 Council Agenda - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

The site plan shows the following approximate breakdown of space. Parking Required Office: 650 sq. ft. 3 Shop: 1,600 sq. ft. 4 Storage: 1,600 sq. ft. 3 TOTAL REQUIRED PARKING 10 Some conceptual design notes have been made to the site plan shown as Exhibit D. It is our opinion that the plan, as presented, does not meet the original intent of the district as it was established. The building materials are primarily stucco, and the residential . architectural style is out of character with most modern commercial construction. As a result, the policy question which the City must address is whether 'or not this project will obstruct further development of the district. Since there is adequate residential property to the south to construct a project meeting the district's intent, the Schmieg project should not physically block area development The City needs to decide, if approval is given, whether it is wtilling to absorb the additional investment in the property as a part of potential future acquisition for a larger conforming project. If not, the project proposal should be denied for reasons relating to non - compliance with the intent of the Planned Unit Development District, the City's Development District Plan, and the Goals and Objectives of the City's Comprehensive Plan. If the City decides that the redevelopment of the property, as proposed, is acceptable, we would recommend the following: 1. A registered survey be made verifying existing and proposed setbacks and building locations. 2. The Development Stage PUD site plans be drawn meeting the comments noted in this report, and as required by the Zoning Ordinance. 3. The Building Inspector verify building setback and separation requirements for the proposed commercial buildings and uses. 4. Drainage plans be included with Development Stage submissions showing control of runoff for the site. 3 Page 42