My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-12-1992 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1992
>
02-12-1992 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/26/2013 2:53:41 PM
Creation date
7/26/2013 2:52:43 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br />Pay Equity Implementation Report <br />ubmlt by January 31, 1992 to: <br />Pay Equity Coordinator <br />Department of Employee Relations <br />200 Centennial Building <br />• 658 Cedar Street <br />St. Paul MN 55155 (612-296-2653) <br />For Department Use Only <br />Postmark Date of Report <br />Jurisdiction ID Number <br />C V <br />Name of Jurisdiction <br />Little Canada <br />Q City ❑ County ❑ School <br />Address <br />❑ Other. <br />Contact Person <br />515 Little Canada Road, Little Canada, MN 55117 <br />Joel Hanson <br />Phone (612) 484 -2177 <br />Part B: Official verdict <br />O The Job evaluation system used measured skin, effort <br />responsibility and working conditions and the same <br />system was used for all classes of employees. <br />Check one of the following: <br />❑ State Job Match <br />❑ Designed Own (specify) <br />❑ Consultants System (specify) <br />❑ Other (specify) <br />© Benefits for male and female classes of comparable <br />value have been evaluated and: <br />❑ There Is no difference and female classes are not <br />at o disadvantage. <br />Et There Is a difference and the maximum salaries <br />reported Include the monthly amount paid by the <br />employer for health insurance. <br />© Information In this report Is complete and accurate. <br />Q The report Includes all classes of employees over <br />which the Jurisdiction has flnal budgetary approval <br />authority. <br />0 <br />© No ranges /performance differences. Check one: <br />❑ This Jurisdiction does not have salary ranges for any of its <br />classes. Documentation about performance differ- <br />ences Is available upon request to explain apparent <br />Inequities between male and female classes. <br />a This Item does not apply to this Jurisdiction. <br />Q An official notice has been posted at <br />Employee lunchroan bulletin board <br />(prom/ner/location) <br />Informing employees that the Pay Equftylmplementation <br />Report has been filed and is available to employees upon <br />request. Also, a copy of the report has been sent to each <br />exclusive representative, it any, and a copy has been made <br />available In the public library. The report was approved by: <br />City Council <br />(govert ngooW) <br />Raymond G. Hanson <br />(chief elected ofrcbf. rxint) <br />"•(chieferechedottiiciatsignca re) <br />Mayor 1 -31 -92 <br />fie) (date) <br />Result from Salary Range Worksheet <br />92 % is the result after average years to salary range maximum for male classes is divided by the <br />average years to salary range maximum for female classes. <br />Nnte• fnec not inc1rvlr3 cta5.a withnut a salary range <br />Results from Exceptional Service Pay Worksheet <br />i Less than 20% of male classes receive ESP. <br />% is the result from the worksheet (percentage of female classes receiving ESP is divided by <br />the percentage of male classes receiving ESP). <br />S 414036.41 is the annual payroll for 1991. <br />(Part F on Back) Page 16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.