My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-28-1992 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1992
>
10-28-1992 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/8/2013 11:50:06 AM
Creation date
8/8/2013 11:46:42 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
106
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />PLANNING COMMISSION <br />OCTOBER 8, 1992 <br />Commission for a decision. <br />DeLonais stated that he understands the property <br />owners' frustrations, however, the Commission must make <br />sure that the proposal complies with Code. DeLonais <br />suggested that the applicant work with the City Planner <br />prior to the October 28th meeting to get all the <br />concerns ironed out. DeLonais pointed out that the <br />City worked in good faith to try to get the area <br />developed. <br />Siebenaler pointed out that only raw land was developed <br />by Brueggemann. <br />DeLonais reported that the City approached 10 <br />developers, and only Brueggemann was interested. <br />Siebenaler felt that the City should then have let the <br />property owners develop their property on their own. <br />Siebenaler pointed out that they had developers <br />interested in their property as had Mr. Rudy. <br />Siebenaler pointed out the diversity of development in <br />the area. Siebenaler felt it was the property owner's <br />right to be able to sell their property. Siebenaler <br />felt that something must be settled on Country Drive. <br />Drabik suggested a special meeting so that the <br />applicant could come back with a site plan. <br />DeLonais indicated that the Planning Commission could <br />act on the matter subject to a site plan being <br />submitted prior to the Council meeting that was <br />satisfactory to the City Planner. <br />Garske stated that he had a problem with that. Garske <br />felt that the Commission should review a site plan <br />pointing out the effect of a development on neighboring <br />properties. Garske stated that the purpose of the <br />Planning Commission is to protect the City. <br />DeLonais asked if there was anyone else from the <br />general public who wished to comment on this matter. <br />Bob Rudy, 2942 Condit, asked the hours that Precision <br />Tree would be working. <br />Olson replied that they would arrive at the business <br />approximately 7:30 A.M., do 30 to 40 minutes of <br />planning, with trucks leaving about 8:10 A.M. <br />Rudy asked about the type of equipment the business <br />would have. <br />Page 6 <br />Page 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.