Laserfiche WebLink
Update on Tax - Exempt Bonds <br />As part of the Fiscal Year 2014 Federal Budget Proposal, representatives of Congress and the <br />President have recently proposed changes to either eliminate or reduce the ability of investors to <br />declare interest paid on tax- exempt bonds exempt from federal income taxation, capping the interest <br />deduction at 28 %. The National Association of Counties produced a study titled "Municipal Bonds <br />Build America: A County Perspective on Changing the Tax - Exempt Status of Municipal Bond <br />Interest". <br />This study included an analysis of the municipal bond market and the estimated impact of a 28% cap <br />and a repeal of the tax- exempt status of municipal bond interest of the 3,069 county governments. <br />Main findings of the study include: <br />1. Municipal bonds finance a wide range of locally selected infrastructure projects and have a long <br />history of low default rates. Between 2003 and 2012, counties, states, school districts, and other <br />localities invested $3.2 trillion in infrastructure through long -term tax - exempt municipal bonds, 2.5 <br />times more than the federal government. In terms of defaults, the ten -year cumulative average default <br />rate from 1970 -2012 for municipal issuers with a Moody's Rating of "A" was 0.05% compared to <br />2.48% for corporate issuers with the same rating. <br />2. Any tax imposed on currently tax - exempt municipal bond interest will affect all Americans, as <br />investors in municipal bonds and as taxpayers securing the payments of municipal bonds. American <br />households are the largest holders of municipal bonds, owning 45% of all municipal bonds outright, <br />and another 29% of the market through mutual fund holdings. The study notes that half of Americans <br />who hold municipal bonds are people over 65 years old and another 23% are between 55 and 65 <br />years old. In 2010, 84% of Americans who benefited frotn the tax - exempt status of municipal bond <br />interest earned less than $250,000 annually. If municipal bonds lose tax - exempt status, nearly all <br />municipal bond holders would have to pay federal income taxes on the interest earned. In the case of <br />a 28% cap, only investors in tax brackets above 28% would have to pay the difference between their <br />federal income tax rate and 28% on their interest earned on their holdings of municipal bonds. At the <br />same time, the higher debt service would impact counties and other state and local governments' <br />budgets, directly affecting the taxpaying public. <br />3. In 2012 alone, the debt service burden for counties would have risen by $9 billion if municipal <br />bonds were taxable over the last 15 years and by about $3.2 billion in case of a 28% minimum tax <br />rate for certain income earners. <br />At Ehlers, we feel our issuer clients are the strongest advocates for illustrating the importance of the <br />tax - exemption of interest on municipal bonds. We have prepared a sample Resolution to be <br />considered by your Governing Body supporting no changes to the exemption of interest on municipal <br />bonds. A copy of the Resolution in Microsoft Word can be found on our website under "market <br />update" in the lower right hand corner at www.ehlers- inc.com. We encourage passage of this <br />Resolution by your Governing Body and forwarding a copy of the adopted Resolution to your <br />congressional representatives. <br />