Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />City Council <br />May 23, 1984 <br />1 In 10 <br />(Cont.) <br />3 Carle <br />Landscape <br />Agenda <br />Item No. 19 <br />Imp. 83 -19, <br />22, 29 <br />Bids <br />Agenda <br />Item No. 20 <br />Mr. Hanson asked what the City can do about the case where someone <br />is already renting part of their house. Hanson felt this was a foggy <br />issue, but said that he would support eliminating the 1 in 10 <br />provision. <br />Mr. Fahey did not think the City could eliminate situations where <br />part of the house is being rented. Mr. Forsberg pointed out the <br />situations where there are a lot of young people living together. <br />Mr. Fahey introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION NO. 84 -5 -249 - RESCINDING THE 1 IN <br />10 DUPLEX PROVISION IN R -1 AREAS CONTAINED IN <br />CITY ORDINANCE <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Mrs. Scalze. <br />Ayes (5) Fahey, Scalze, Hanson, Nardini, Forsberg. <br />Nayes (0). <br />Resolution declared adopted. <br />This resolution appears in Resolution Book NO. 11, Page 264. <br />The Planner reported that the material in the agendas on Carle <br />Landscaping is for Council information. <br />21, The Engineer reported that the bids on Improvement Nos. 83 -19, 21, <br />22, 29 are over estimate. There were nine bidders on the project. <br />The Engineer reported that the price of pipe has gone up. Also, <br />there is a lot of work available and there are fewer contractors <br />bidding. <br />Mr. Forsberg suggested that the work he bid again in about two months. <br />Mrs. Scalze asked if this was done, if the work could be completed <br />by the fall. Mr. Forsberg stated that it could. <br />Mr. Carley pointed out that Lee I.eMay's Addition has a high water table. <br />The Engineer did not think that lower bids could be guaranteed if <br />the work was bid later. Mr. Carley pointed out that the cost per <br />foot for Viking Drive is $63. By combining this area with the <br />others in the City, it gives the Viking Drive people a break. <br />Mr. Carley reported that he told the Viking Drive people that the <br />cost would be about $49 per front foot. <br />Mrs. Scalze asked if the Viking Drive project could be eliminated. <br />Page 9 <br />