Laserfiche WebLink
t9 Fti 't k1a — 5_ T H I I 1 e. : 1 i E: O N E e_i T F: <br />Bonestroo <br />Rosene <br />Anderlik & <br />Associates <br />Engineers & Archltects <br />May 20. 1993 <br />City of Little Canada <br />515 Little Canada Road <br />Little Canada, MN 55117 <br />Attn: Joel Hanson <br />r. prpr.r.r.,n P. <br />Polve Ur Porn' Pt <br />. rr tr• • Arr1rN1 04, <br />Marva ! ntv.ri.t 1'F <br />N4 Nue! I INN? ('I' <br />(lime I (NIX Pk' <br />thrrrP.n 1 NOVA 1'I' <br />4eor•n f khunIrnp PI <br />lr)...nM I Prr,n.t PA <br />A m° ( rrupJOr,n <br />)lrw.r:,l A \nn4)•1. <br />Qin. A Gw,Prn. P5 <br />quern a '.torn' 1' <br />Ae n.ml W Fn irr PE <br />4.rvnl (I 1 mi((g0. PE <br />Morn C Ru„rk. A I A <br />bury A hou■'llln, PE <br />Mark A 1 Lr1<On, PE <br />NEtb.rel 1 :av11tl.°1/1 VF <br />led K ,rekl PF <br />ttfOnu. P Amlr• nn. AP <br />I)une41 C O;%31 I1L PF <br />IPnnu( F An]w . P6 <br />'(marl Marton(, Pr; <br />.3 O F_ I fl T E 'o <br />M,r(n.rr' ° Rau. PC <br />P.011 1 r'yn.. PI- <br />Aim M 00np A lC P <br />thnnol W Pcrrnnn. I't. <br />Whorl C Lynch. PE <br />JPAIC R AMIN. PE <br />Jerry 0 Pw:I,v b. I.1 <br />1(1'r rnflll P MIDrnot, Pt <br />Kok R. Rt411. F•F <br />Mark A yelp PE <br />A Gary W MArrnn, PC <br />DAniM .I ftlyc'IwII PE <br />AIIPn RICV irnm,dl, PP, <br />PNllp 1 Caw.vr' P0 <br />F - 0 <br />rl <br />V..11 , H ',Ann r( <br />Vre.p(.aw°':I Fri <br />R,tmn r •<Vrr rtnr r' <br />oar 1.) rr:,;nru( P1 <br />i 11,1:11Pnlel Pl. <br />kPPr P v.tou P!. <br />nr,ru;_r, I nrnrvl nt <br />11r.lwu 11 F lu•.Ld(un Pt <br />(r, nru(IDvr, P(' <br />rrl.mr, A nr,..,:,, <br />IrnM l'.Arlvy <br />!Ivor M Dorm <br />Inmr, r rrprvl'ra«11 <br />Re: Ryan Industrial Park Street Improvement <br />Our File No. 37209 <br />Honorable Mayor and City Council: <br />We are in the process of designing Street Improvements for the Ryan Industrial Park. The street <br />surface has deteriorated considerably since it was first evaluated in 1991. <br />At the public hearing held in November of 1991, we indicated that if the street was not attended to <br />soon, the patch and overlay option would not he a viable option. Due to the degradation of the <br />roadway surface, we are evaluating a reclamation project in lieu of a patch and overlay approach. <br />In reclaiming a road surface, the existing bituminous material is grinded in place and utilized as <br />aggregate base material. A new bituminous surface is then installed over the new formed aggregate <br />base once grading and re-compaction of the road base material is completed. <br />The advantages of a reclamation project over a patch and overlay project include an improved ability <br />to construct street grades that allow for drainage from the road surface. Also, an entirely new road <br />surface is installed under the reclamation project option. One disadvantage might he that the overall <br />elevation of the roadway is higher as roadway material is added but not removed from the street <br />right of way. We feel that a reclamation project can he completed within the 5250,000 total project <br />cost budget. An itemized cost estimate for the work is included for your review. <br />We anticipate that project plans and specifications will he presented to the council for approval in <br />June. 111 he available at the council meeting to answer any questions that you may have regarding <br />the project. <br />Yours very truly, <br />BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. <br />»7 Pex ymcz <br />Michael C. Lynch <br />MCL:Ik <br />Enclosure <br />Page 22 <br />