Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />City Council <br />July 13, 1988 <br />Boosalis Fahey replied that assessment issues have not been determined at this <br />Rezoning time. Fahey also commented that he felt the development proposal <br />Request submitted by Mr. Boosalis was a good one which satisfied the concerns <br />(Cont.) of Iona Lane and provided for residential development of the property <br />to the east of the commercial property along Rice Street. Fahey noted <br />that the question that will be left open is what happens to the back <br />of the three commercial properties along County Road C, and this issue <br />can be addressed at a later date. <br />Souchy felt that the property could be left as open space and a wildlife <br />area. <br />Blesener pointed out that the City cannot provide such an open wildlife <br />area that would be available only to the County Road C area. <br />Fahey commented that the City Council understands Mr. Souchy's objections <br />to the overall project. <br />Mr. Blesener introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION NO. 88 -7 -268 - CLOSING THE PUBLIC <br />HEARING ON THE REQUEST FOR PUD AMENDMENTS BY <br />REZONING FROM 8 -3, GENERAL BUSINESS, TO R -1, <br />SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Mr. Fahey. <br />Ayes (5) Blesener, Fahey, Collova, Scalze, LaValle. <br />Nays (0). <br />Resolution declared adopted. <br />This resolution appears in Resolution Book No. 20, Page 272. <br />Blesener reported that the Council has reviewed several development <br />proposals for this particular property in the last few years, and the <br />one before the Council is the best proposal he has seen. This proposal <br />will put residential development behind the Iona Lane properties. <br />Scalze pointed out that once the City rezones the Boosalis property to <br />R -1 it gives the indication that the other three commercial properties <br />will be rezoned to R -1 at some point. <br />Blesener agreed and stated that it is his intention that all the property <br />along the new street be zoned R -1. <br />Fahey agreed that R -1 was the best use given the lay -out of the area, <br />however, he is willing to listen to the property owners at the time <br />a rezoning may be proposed for the other three commercial properties <br />along County Road C. <br />Mr. Blesener introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />Page -3- <br />Page 52 <br />