My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-23-1993 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1993
>
06-23-1993 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/28/2013 2:32:53 PM
Creation date
8/28/2013 2:30:41 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
91
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mayor & City Council <br />March 16, 1993 <br />Page 9 <br />It has always been my contention that approximately the same parking <br />demand is generated by either youth or adults, and as attested to by Jim <br />Olson at the City Council meeting of February 24, 1993, he feels that <br />possibly more demand is created from youth use. <br />Adult and children demands for our most desireable fields have existed for <br />years. Before Pioneer Park, all teams wanted to play on Gilbertson (Field <br />E -1). In response to that demand, I initiated a schedule of Gilbertson <br />Field that allowed use by everyone involved. On the nights when <br />conflicting demand existed (M,Tu,W,Th), I split up the use by scheduling <br />it one night each for all four requesting parties (girls, boys, women, and <br />men). Over the past ten years or so, this method of scheduling has been <br />one that has proven to be as fair as possible and very well accepted by <br />all involved. <br />Since development of Pioneer Park, the same popularity for those fields <br />now exists. Last year I initiated the same balance of that complex <br />between children and adults. <br />The demand for facilities by both children and adults is growing in our <br />community. As Parks and Recreation Director, I feel it is my job to <br />respond to these needs. The needs and demands of adults for ball fields <br />are just as important as that of the children (and just as prevelant). <br />Although the number of resident adults last season was approximately 18% <br />of the total number of adult ball players, our residents needs were met <br />very well. Fifty percent of all sponsors were resident businesses, and of <br />the remaining 82% of players, a good percentage of those work for various <br />City businesses. <br />Another consideration is that Little Canada does not have enough residents <br />in any of the adult softball classifications to conduct a league on their <br />own. The resident ball players in Little Canada need non - residents to <br />make leagues possible. <br />I feel that the shortage of parking that existed at Pioneer Park last <br />season was a minor problem. After notifying all teams involved when the <br />problem surfaced during the first few weeks of play, and after prohibiting <br />parking on Centerville Road, there were very few times that street parking <br />on Desoto existed. <br />While I feel the need for adult parking at the facility is evident for <br />future maximization of the park, I am confident that we could get by for <br />one more year without changing programming from last year. To try to <br />reschedule games to other fields because of the relatively insignificant <br />problems of last year would create more imbalance and more scheduling <br />conflicts than it would eliminate. <br />Page 78 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.