Laserfiche WebLink
C64 1 979a74 ce(0 -na%e <br />515 Little Canada Road, Little Canada, MN 55117 -1600 <br />(612) 484 -2177 / FAX: (612) 484 -4538 <br />MEMORANDUM <br />TO: Mayor Hanson & Members of the City Council <br />FROM: Joel Hanson, City Administrator <br />DATE: October 8, 1993 <br />RE: Edgerton Street Water Main Improvement <br />MAYOR <br />Raymond G. Hanson <br />COUNCIL <br />Beverly Scalze <br />Jim LaValle <br />Steve MoreIan <br />Bob Pedersen <br />ADMINISTRATOR <br />Joel R. Hanson <br />Enclosed is a revised assessment roll for the Edgerton <br />Street. After doing further review of the initial roll we <br />previously adopted, it was discovered that the assessable <br />portion of project costs was miscalculated. The revised <br />roll calculates assessable costs in a manner consistent <br />with those presented during the improvement hearing. It is <br />my opinion that we should be consistent in that regard and <br />as a result, it is my recommendation that we would adopt <br />the revised roll. <br />Also, enclosed is a deferment listing for your <br />consideration. These are lots that were considered <br />subdividable and therefore assessed for a service. Some of <br />these residents may claim that they have no intention of <br />subdividing their property and therefore should not be <br />assessed. If that is the case, deferment on the costs <br />associated with the subdividable portion of the lot could <br />be deferred until the property is developed. (Interest <br />would accrue from the date of levy.) This consideration <br />should be made on a parcel by parcel basis based on the <br />desire of the applicant. I would not recommend deferments <br />unless they are requested by property owner. <br />Based upon some information received late Friday afternoon <br />from Ed McCumber of 3096 Edgerton Street (parcels 48 and <br />50), it appears only one service should be assessed to that <br />property given the fact the City required the property <br />consist of only one parcel. (A copy of the Planner's <br />report relative to this matter is enclosed for your <br />review.) If the Council concurs with this information, the <br />assessment would be reduced by $1,448.94. (The assessment <br />associated with lineal footage would remain the same.) <br />Page 34 <br />