Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />PLANNING COMMISSION <br />NOVEMBER 9, 1993 <br />very little impact on retail business interception. <br />The Planner reported that sign ordinances serve to keep <br />neighbors from obscuring property with obnoxious signs. <br />The Planner also indicated that when someone is <br />choosing a business location they will typically ask <br />about traffic counts, zoning ordinances, etc. It is <br />only after a property has been purchased that the <br />business owner will come in and ask about signage. The <br />Planner did not believe that signage was an issue in <br />choosing a retail location. <br />The Planner suggested that the Commission review his <br />report and be prepared to discuss it at the next <br />meeting. <br />Knudsen pointed out that the Gas N Go property owner <br />indicated that the Roseville ordinance was more <br />liberal. <br />The Planner replied that Roseville would allow a 20 <br />foot high pylon, however, that pylon would have to be <br />set back 30 feet from the property line. Little Canada <br />allows a 16 foot high pylon with a 5 foot setback, and <br />the height of the pylon could be increased the further <br />it is set back from the property line. <br />Keis pointed out that the sign ordinance gets revisited <br />every couple of years. <br />Knudsen felt it prudent for the City to review its <br />competitive situation periodically. <br />Carson pointed out the Planner's comments that the <br />City's sign ordinance is not out of line with adjacent <br />cities. <br />The Planner indicated that the ordinance is typical of <br />most communities in the Metro area. <br />Carson expressed concern about the Burger King sign. <br />The Planner indicated that the ordinance says that once <br />a sign no longer represents an existing business, it <br />must be removed. However, in this instance the <br />building is still there and the City held off on <br />requiring the sign to come down pending a decision on <br />the status of the building. <br />Schletty expressed concern for enforcement, pointing <br />out that the Burger King building has been vacant for <br />almost 2 years, the sign has been covered, and that <br />cover is now falling off. <br />Page 8 <br />