My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-24-1993 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1993
>
11-24-1993 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2013 2:06:22 PM
Creation date
9/5/2013 2:04:42 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
76
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />PLANNING COMMISSION <br />NOVEMBER 9, 1993 <br />The Planner did not feel it unreasonable for the City <br />to hold off on action against this sign since there was <br />the possibility that the sign would be reused. <br />Carson felt it was situations like this that made the <br />City look messy. <br />Knudsen pointed out the requirement for the quansit hut <br />on the Sculley property to come down next year, and <br />asked who would enforce that issue. Knudsen pointed <br />out that the screening ordinance has not been enforced. <br />Keis asked about the billboard issue recently discussed <br />by the Council. <br />The Administrator reported that the billboard is <br />illegal under the City's ordinance, but to enforce that <br />ordinance would require the City to spend thousands of <br />dollars. The Administrator also reported that he has <br />had numerous conversations with TCF about the Burger <br />King sign. It now appears that the Burger King <br />building will come down. TCF has also indicated that <br />they will be making application to retain the pylon <br />sign for use by the bingo hall. The Administrator <br />reported that he has informed TCF to make that <br />application as soon as possible so this matter can be <br />resolved. <br />COMP PLAN Knudsen asked if in <br />will be asked their <br />The Planner replied <br />solicited. <br />updating the Comp Plan businesses <br />attitude towards the City's codes. <br />that this opinion would be <br />The City Administrator informed the Commission that at <br />the Council /Staff goal setting session, updating of the <br />Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code tied for third place <br />in the list of priorities that were developed. The <br />Administrator felt it was important for the Commission <br />to document what it wants to accomplish by updating the <br />Comp Plan, noting the estimated cost of $17,500 to do <br />so. The Administrator also felt that the Commission <br />should be clear on what it wants to accomplish in <br />updating the plan so the City will get the product it <br />wants. <br />Knudsen pointed out that the current Comp Plan is an <br />outdated document that provides no relevant information <br />about where the City wants to go. The document <br />provides no feedback relevant to today's issues. <br />Keis stated that some of the information in the current <br />plan is still usable. Keis asked if the new plan would <br />Page 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.