Laserfiche WebLink
2.3 Geotechnical Summary <br />Chosen Valley Testing was hired to prepare a Geotechnical Engineering Report to determine the <br />existing road cross - section. This included pavement thickness, aggregate base thickness, and <br />subgrade soil type. Twenty -seven soil borings were taken on area streets. Exhibit 7 provides a <br />summary of the soil borings while Exhibit 8 provides a map of the soil boring locations. <br />2.31 Soil Conditions <br />A variety of soil conditions were encountered through the various soil borings taken from the <br />neighborhood streets. The following is a summary of the commonly found existing soil profiles as <br />described in the Design Phase Geotechnical Report submitted by Chosen Valley Testing and <br />dated October 12, 2012. <br />1) 13 of 27 borings <br />o Bituminous pavement thicknesses vary from 2 to 8 inches. <br />o No defined aggregate base currently in place. <br />o Sub -grade materials are generally sandy with a little silt and gravel material. <br />2) 9 of 27 borings <br />o Bituminous pavement thicknesses vary from 2 to 8 inches. <br />o No defined aggregate base currently in place. <br />o Sub -grade materials are generally sandy with intermixed silt and clay material. <br />3) 5 of 27 borings <br />o Bituminous pavement thicknesses vary from 5 to 7 inches. <br />o No defined aggregate base currently in place. <br />o Sub -grade material is mostly silts and clays. <br />Groundwater was not observed in any of the borings; however areas of moist soil were noted <br />which can indicate areas susceptible to perched groundwater. <br />Existing bituminous thicknesses vary from 2 to 8 inches, with an average thickness of 5 inches. <br />The streets in the project area were originally constructed in the 1960's. The streets were <br />subsequently overlaid and seal- coated as pavement conditions deteriorated. The placement of an <br />overlay, as well as the seal- coating of the project streets, represented a short-term pavement <br />surface correction. As was noted in the geotechnical report, a lack of a defined aggregate base <br />was seen throughout the project area. It appears from the data provided in the geotechnical report <br />that the sub -grade had not been modified to provide proper support for the original pavement <br />section, contributing to the pavements deterioration over the years. <br />Sub -grade soils mostly consisted of natural sands, with some being silty or clayey in nature. <br />These materials are generally suitable for pavement support when accompanied with an <br />engineered aggregate base. Areas of silts and clays were noted in the geotechnical report to be <br />present in the northeastern area of the project, including portions of Burr Street, Highway Drive, <br />Hendry Place, and Sunrise Drive. These materials are generally not suitable for pavement support <br />and are more susceptible to frost. <br />Infiltration rates should generally be moderate to high within the project area, given the poorly <br />graded sands present in the majority of the project area. This infiltration capacity makes the <br />neighborhood a good candidate for rainwater gardens. <br />7 <br />17 <br />