My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-10-2013 Planning Agenda
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
10-10-2013 Planning Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/4/2013 12:53:08 PM
Creation date
10/4/2013 12:51:45 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Fencing. Proposed fences must comply with standards outlined in Section 903.020.F.8. <br />Signs. The applicant has indicated that he will be installing business signage for the <br />property. All signs must comply with Section 903.110 of the ordinance. <br />Stormwater Management. All site and building improvements must comply with Section <br />928 of the ordinance. <br />SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br />The applicant is requesting a PUD permit for temporary commercial reuse of the <br />buildings located at 2968 Rice Street. The property contains three structures: a home, <br />a garage /storage building, and a large garage /warehouse. The applicant intends to <br />make a series of improvements to the site and buildings and market them to prospective <br />rental tenants. The applicant is suggesting that the transitional nature of the area and <br />plans for future redevelopment justify a lower standard of site improvements for the <br />immediate future. He is proposing an interim use permit through the PUD zoning for the <br />existing development on the property until such time as redevelopment becomes <br />feasible. <br />There are two threshold questions for the City in this case. <br />First, will the City consider a series of unrelated land uses, including some that are not <br />commonly allowed in commercial areas, to occupy the property, even for an interim <br />period? The applicant has mentioned outdoor storage, as well as warehousing uses of <br />the existing buildings as potential uses on the property. The PUD zoning may <br />accommodate flexibility in this regard, however, the commercial zoning standards would <br />typically not allow storage (indoor or outdoor) as principal uses. Indoor storage is <br />allowed when it is a secondary, accessory use of property in support of a retail or <br />office /service activity. Thus, what land uses are acceptable on the property? <br />Second, will the City consider allowing a property owner to vary from some or all of the <br />performance standards that would commonly apply to commercial development? As <br />noted, the applicant is proposing to make improvements to the structures on the subject <br />parcel, but proposes no substantive change to the site, other than some gravel parking <br />which is outside the City's typical standards. Setbacks for parking, drainage <br />improvements, green space, and other common commercial development standards <br />are proposed to be waived for some interim period until the applicant finds a larger, <br />more extensive commercial user of both 2962 and 2968 Rice Street. <br />While common ownership of the two parcels may facilitate a larger coordinated project, <br />it is unclear that there will be actual incentive to accomplish that goal. PreWire <br />proposes to use a significant portion of 2962 Rice Street for necessary parking — <br />assuming that their use continues, the joint redevelopment of the two parcels seems <br />unlikely. <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.