My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-27-1994 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1994
>
07-27-1994 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/7/2013 2:00:54 PM
Creation date
10/7/2013 1:53:43 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
244
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page Four <br />such as compaction test results, which would have been performed at <br />the time the fill was placed and therefore there is no absolute <br />assurance that the fill is uniform in composition and density. We <br />must caution you that relying on the existing fill for support of <br />your new structure will include some minor risk. This risk would be <br />one of excessive differential settlement due to variations in the <br />composition and density of the fill or potential for compressible <br />soils being present below the fill, factors which would not be <br />detected at the time of construction. <br />Grading Recommendation - <br />For preparation of the building, we recommend stripping of <br />surficial vegetation and disturbed soils to expose the top of the <br />fly ash fill system. We then recommended removal of peat soils <br />(northeast quadrant) using a backhoe. This would involve a subcut <br />of about 8' at boring 3, about 5' at test pit 2 and 5.3' at test <br />pit 1. Ideally, the deeper subcut through the peat should be <br />followed by placement of a controlled granular fill, using sand <br />soils having less than 15% passing the #200 sieve. The material <br />should be compacted in thin lifts to at least 95% of the Standard <br />Proctor value. The excavation should be observed by a geotechnical <br />engineer prior to fill placement. <br />The test pit work documented several areas where the upper portion <br />of the fly ash fill was loose. We recommend that these areas be <br />reworked or the fly ash be removed and replaced. Thus, the <br />excavation into the fly ash fill system should terminate upon firm <br />fly ash material only, at final subcut grade. <br />The remainder of the building area should then be brought up to <br />grade, preferably by use of a granular compacted fill. Again, the <br />fill should be placed in thin lifts and compacted to 95% of the <br />Standard Proctor value. <br />Where perimeter footings are to be supported on new fill, the <br />excavation bottoms should be laterally oversized a minimum distance <br />of 1' for each foot of fill required below footing elevation; i.e., <br />a 1:1 lateral oversize. This is required for proper support of the <br />lateral loads exerted by the footings through the fill system. <br />Foundation Recommendations - <br />It is our judgement that spread footing construction bearing on the <br />fill can then be utilized. All exterior footings in heated areas <br />should be placed at a minimum depth of 42" below final exterior <br />grade for frost protection. Interior footings in these areas can be <br />placed at a convenient depth below the floor slab, bearing on <br />suitable material. Any footings (both - interior and exterior) <br />required in unheated areas should be extended to a minimum depth of <br />60" below final exterior grade. Where possible, we recommend the <br />footings be placed as high as possible, in order to provide for <br />compacted sand fill below the footings, particularly for the <br />interior column pads where we anticipate the loads will be <br />greatest. <br />Page 54 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.