Laserfiche WebLink
subject to some tree impact. On Australian, right -of- <br />way is needed. The impact to adjoining properties will <br />depend on the design. If we were to require the entire <br />cul -de -sac be on the Tima property, he should be <br />compensated for it. My basis for this statement lies <br />in the assumption that we need to correct a problem <br />with the dead end irrespective of Tima's subdivision. <br />Therefore, he should not have to bear the cost of <br />correcting our problem. Given the fact it appears that <br />a road connection could be constructed which would <br />allow him the creation of two lots, the cul -de -sac <br />solution preferred by the majority of the neighborhood <br />should not be entirely his burden. This item should be <br />discussed in greater detail by the Council. <br />4. It does not seem unreasonable to me to allow a <br />subdivision of Mr. Tima's property at this time as long <br />as we have made provision for adequate right -of -way and <br />access in the future. It does seem apparent that we <br />need to decide on a course of action for the turn- <br />around situation before finalizing Mr. Tima's <br />subdivision decision. Our actions should not grant him <br />any special privilege nor should they penalize him <br />unfairly. <br />cc: Louis Tima <br />Berniece Magnuson <br />Jerry Bourdon <br />Steve Grittman <br />-5- <br />Page 56 <br />