My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-26-1994 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1994
>
01-26-1994 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/9/2013 2:04:00 PM
Creation date
10/9/2013 2:02:11 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
154
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />PLANNING COMMISSION <br />JANUARY 13, 1994 <br />The Commission discussed the height of the signage, and <br />felt that the pylons on the site should meet Code <br />requirements. If a 30 foot height is allowed, the <br />pylon should be moved 15 feet further east. <br />Chazin reported that he would be willing to move the <br />sign as far east as possible without going into the <br />parking lot. Chazin reported that he was willing to <br />work with the City Planner on the best solution. <br />Chazin pointed out that The Market Place Shopping <br />Center is a 90,000 square foot shopping center, which <br />is three times the size of the average strip mall. <br />Garske recommended approval of a variance to allow the <br />construction of one large pylon sign at The Market <br />Place Shopping Center similar to the option presented <br />by Team Properties due to the fact that the shopping <br />center was constructed under unusual circumstances in <br />that the property is oddly shaped, the building is <br />perpendicular to the property, and the frontage along <br />Rice Street is inadequate for the size of the building <br />subject to the maximum area of the sign being limited <br />to 400 square feet in size, subject to the pylon being <br />no more than 30 feet in height, and subject to removal <br />of the two existing pylons from the site. <br />Motion seconded by Carson. <br />Motion carried 5 - 1. Keis voted against. <br />SHORELAND The Commission reviewed the Shoreland Ordinance as <br />ORDINANCE presented by the City Planner. The Planner pointed out <br />that the Ordinance is being updated to include <br />recommendations for updating from the DNR. <br />Schletty recommended adoption of the Shoreland <br />Ordinance revision as presented by the City Planner. <br />Motion seconded by Keis. <br />Motion carried 6 - 0. <br />SCREENING The Commission reviewed the proposed revision to the <br />ORDINANCE Screening Ordinance which adds slatted chain -line <br />fencing as an acceptable screening material in the <br />Industrial District. <br />Carson recommended adoption of the Screening Ordinance <br />revision as presented. <br />Motion seconded by Schletty. <br />Motion carried 6 - 0. <br />Page 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.