Laserfiche WebLink
correlated with the remainder of the issue questions to isolate <br />areas of cleavage. <br />DRL recommends that a telephone -based survey be conducted. The <br />refusal rate on similar studies undertaken in Little Canada and <br />neighboring communities shows a very low refusal rate -- less <br />than five percent -- in this type of approach. Mail -outs usually <br />obtain response rates of between thirty and fifty percent, while <br />inserts in water bills post response rates of ten to twenty <br />percent. In addition, there is a response bias in both of these <br />methodologies, with responses skewed toward more older residents, <br />home owners, and minorities intensely concerned with the issues <br />raised in the survey. In order to insure an unbiased and repre- <br />sentative sample, telephone surveys are able to minimize this <br />type of self - selection bias. <br />To insure the integrity of the sample, DRL places the most exact- <br />ing sampling standards in the industry on our procedures. Before <br />an alternate respondent is substituted for a designated target, <br />numerous tries are made to contact the initial household. The <br />calls take place during various times on weekday evenings and <br />during the weekend. Our phoners are also instructed to seek <br />convenient appointments with interviewees, cutting our in- process <br />refusal rate to less than three percent on average. <br />The computer analysis will be obtained from the DRL remote job <br />entry facility to the University of Minnesota VAX system, insur- <br />ing both access to the most current statistical analysis programs <br />and confidentiality of the data set. <br />The City would be presented with two bound copies of the final <br />report highlighting all the major findings of the study. A <br />volume of all computer generated cross - tabulation and other <br />multi - variate statistical techniques will also be included to <br />provide the "raw data" required for further secondary analyses. <br />In addition, the findings will be presented by me at any meetings <br />or work sessions specified by the City. <br />The components of the project and the proposed time schedule is <br />outlined below: <br />1. Planning meeting with the City to establish the topics to be <br />covered in the survey. Based on these topic concepts, DRL would <br />word specific, neutral questions. This activity to be completed <br />within two weeks of the initiation of the contract. <br />2. Structuring of questions and final approval of the survey <br />instrument. These activities to be completed within four weeks <br />of the initiation of the contract. <br />3. Final determination of the field dates for interviewing. <br />4. Pre - testing and, if needed, approval of resulting revisions. <br />2 <br />rye <br />